FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-01-2008, 11:05 AM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bordeaux France
Posts: 2,796
Default

Is it possible to suppose that these pieces of pottery were made in Egypt during the 3rd century, imported later (when ?) to Iruña Veleia, and broken accidentally (when ?). Then the ostraca could be engraved with Christian scenes, or anything considered useful.

In Aquitaine (north of the Pyrenees) have been found many very old inscriptions containing names of gods or persons. These names can be interpreted as Basque names, except a few, which are ascribed to Iberian, as nobody understand these names !
Huon is offline  
Old 08-01-2008, 11:14 AM   #12
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

Why is a depiction of three crosses assumed to be xian when googling three crosses immediately finds a site referring to three crosses in astrological thinking with a more important central cross?

http://www.alanoken.com/docs/3crosses.htm
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 08-01-2008, 11:28 AM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Posts: 7,984
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Basque language written in Latin alphabet - earlier than any other examples by 8 centuries?
Anything having to do with Basque antiquity is to be treated with utmost suspicion. Basque nationalist terrorism does not consist only of bombs and assassinations, but also of falsifying history.
figuer is offline  
Old 08-01-2008, 11:41 AM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,058
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Huon View Post
The titulus is RIP, clearly to be seen on a picture, lower on the page.
It's hardly clear.

Jeffrey
Jeffrey Gibson is offline  
Old 08-01-2008, 12:02 PM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Posts: 7,984
Default

A brief research of Spanish web pages on the subject casts much doubt regarding the authenticity/interpretation of the findings. Example: The claimed 'basque' inscriptions would lead to the conclusion that said language has not changed in almost two thousand years, which is doubtful.
figuer is offline  
Old 08-01-2008, 12:27 PM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: London, UK
Posts: 3,210
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffrey Gibson View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huon View Post
The titulus is RIP, clearly to be seen on a picture, lower on the page.
It's hardly clear.
It's pretty clear on the large version of the piccie about a quarter of the way down the webpage you referenced.

I've re-uploaded it here.

Hmmm. The closer you look at it the more hokey it gets. "Requiescat in Pace"??? That seems like a very Roman Catholic sort of phrase. Do you know when that phrase was in use? Was it current in the 3rd century?

Regardless, you needn't have gotten so excited anyway Jeffrey, even if this were a valid find, it would only knock Pete's 4th century origins out the window, it wouldnt' touch mythicism in general because mythicism accepts that by the 3rd century probably a substantial proportion of Christians believed the gospel story.
gurugeorge is offline  
Old 08-01-2008, 12:33 PM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,719
Default

RIP seems fairly clear:

Not a slam-dunk, true. But it isn't INRI either. Couldn't have been, I'd say, as, if the dating is right, the Vulgate hadn't yet been written. If it is Roman letters, it seems to end in IP. If it's Greek, in IR. Beyond RIP, does either suggest anything?

Is RIP an authentic Roman phrase, does anyone know? I'm asking because if it isn't there may be a dating problem.

Gerard Stafleu
gstafleu is offline  
Old 08-01-2008, 12:51 PM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Posts: 7,984
Default

http://www.gara.net/paperezkoa/20080...ti-es-una-conv..

Spanish egiptologist, JUAN CARLOS MORENO, explains why at least some aspects of the find (the name Nefertiti in an inscription) are evidently fraudulent. That name is a modern European invention, and refers to a queen that would have been unknown in Roman times.
figuer is offline  
Old 08-01-2008, 01:03 PM   #19
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,058
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gurugeorge View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffrey Gibson View Post

It's hardly clear.
It's pretty clear on the large version of the piccie about a quarter of the way down the webpage you referenced.

I've re-uploaded it here.

Hmmm. The closer you look at it the more hokey it gets. "Requiescat in Pace"??? That seems like a very Roman Catholic sort of phrase. Do you know when that phrase was in use? Was it current in the 3rd century?
To my knowledge, yes -- and even before that, and certainly before there was what can actually be called Roman Catholicism. I believe it is found (in its Greek counterpart) in Acts of John and the Martyrium Polycarp, though I haven't yet checked the texts of these works to be certain.

And if the ostraca is from a funeral/commemorative urn, then the inscription -- if it indeed is RIP -- is hardly out of place.

Quote:
Regardless, you needn't have gotten so excited anyway Jeffrey, even if this were a valid find, it would only knock Pete's 4th century origins out the window, it wouldnt' touch mythicism in general because mythicism accepts that by the 3rd century probably a substantial proportion of Christians believed the gospel story.
You know, I'd be very grateful if you'd drop the paternalism inherent in your words above and leave off attributing to me causes of any emotional state of mind I might exhibit that I give you no grounds for thinking are the case. How do you know that any excitement I expressed with my exclamation point was over something other than how the discovery, if authentic, would deflate Pete's nonsense? Just what do you think I was up to when I noted that the site was a Roman backwater?

Jeffrey
Jeffrey Gibson is offline  
Old 08-02-2008, 01:43 PM   #20
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,402
Default

All in all, looks pretty hokey to me. The urns and other shards may be actual 3rd c. stuff, but the scratches look decidedly childish and simplistic for such things.
cgordon is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:22 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.