Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
07-18-2012, 12:11 AM | #11 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 3,387
|
OK. Email him and tell him that. behrman@email.unc.edu
|
07-18-2012, 12:21 AM | #12 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
Quote:
Did Jesus Exist? appears to be historically Defective. Bart Ehrman admitted and showed that Mythicists are ABSOLUTELY right that there are Genuine problems in the study of the life of the Historical Jesus. |
|
07-18-2012, 12:26 AM | #13 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 3,387
|
Spamming him might be slightly more effective then spamming us... we can't issue a recall you know.
|
07-18-2012, 12:45 AM | #14 |
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
In order to show that there was an historical Jesus Ehrman NEEDED to show that some author of the Jesus story was in actual contact with Jesus when he lived or that the Jesus story could NOT have been written if there was NO actual human Jesus.
Ehrman did the very opposite. Ehrman admitted that there are ZERO authors who were eyewitnesses of Jesus both in and out the Canon and that stories that appear plausible are non-historical like the triumphant entrance to Jerusalem and the release of Barabbas. And this is PRECISELY what MJers PREDICTED. Jesus had NO real existence so everything about him would NOT be from eyewitness accounts and even plausible stories did NOT happen. Inadvertently, Ehrman's Book has EXONERATED the Mythicists. Mythicists are ABSOLUTELY right--Jesus had NO real existence. "Did Jesus Exist?"--NO!! |
07-18-2012, 06:13 PM | #15 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 3,387
|
Who are you talking to?
|
07-18-2012, 06:29 PM | #16 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Another innocent poster roped in to responding to aa5874.
aa5874 is the virtual equivalent of that guy standing on the park yelling at the universe. Sometimes what he says makes sense, sometimes not. |
07-18-2012, 07:14 PM | #17 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
Quote:
Why did Galileo have to tell people that the Earth revolved the Sun when everybody could 'see' he was lying??? Galileo, you Crazy IDIOT, LOOK can't you see the SUN is going around the EARTH?? The earth is NOT moving. The Church did NOT want people to hear Galileo. Well, people did NOT see the EVIDENCE that Galileo had collected and Observed. Galileo had to SHOW them. An Excerpt of a letter of Galileo. Quote:
I see there was NO actual 1st century Pauline writings to churches based on the actual Recovered Dated Texts by Paleography and C 14. The Recovered DATED Texts are EXACTLY as I PREDICTED. Jesus, the Disciples and Paul had NO real existence before c 70 CE. Soon the WHOLE WORLD will know and see the evidence. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...stament_papyri There is a BIG BLACK hole for Jesus, the disciples and Paul in the 1st century and before c 70 CE. Even Ehrman ADMITS the Gospels are filled with discrepancies, contradictions, and events that could NOT have happened. Jesus, the disciples and Paul did NOT really happen before c 70 CE. |
||
07-18-2012, 07:54 PM | #18 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 3,387
|
That's a shame, but hey, at least he can afford to throw away $5 on an Ehrman book. (Or can he... ?) A lot of people don't have that much.
|
07-18-2012, 08:33 PM | #19 | |
Moderator - General Religious Discussions
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 27,330
|
Quote:
|
|
07-18-2012, 08:54 PM | #20 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
Quote:
I have ALREADY resolved the HJ/MJ question. Jesus, the disciples and Paul had NO real existence Before c 70 CE based on the actual Recovered Dated Texts of antiquity. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|