Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
02-05-2010, 05:18 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 740
|
Is this correct? A spurious epistle from Paul to Clement?
EDIT: The title should read "from Paul to Clement," and not the other way around.
The wikipedia page on the epistles of Clement includes the following curious claim: The Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church includes in their wider Biblical canon an epistle traditionally attributed as written by St. Paul to Clement.Now, this is certainly a plausible suggestion, but is it true? I have searched Google, JSTOR and ebrary for some mention of this supposed apocryphal epistle, without so much as a hint of its existence. Can anyone verify the existence of this epistle? Better yet, has anyone published the text of that epistle? Thanks in advance! |
02-05-2010, 10:55 AM | #2 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
|
This site contains a curious article which seems to refer to an item labelled "Clement" in some forms of the Ethiopian canon. A footnote says:
[13] W. Wright, Catalogue of the Ethiopic manuscripts in the British Museum, London 1877, pp. 211-213 and S. Grébaut, "Littérature Éthiopienne Pseudo-Clémentine", Revue de l'Orient Chrétien, Paris 1911, pp. 72-77 contain outlines of this book Qälëmentos. A translation of part 1- part 3, ch. 10, by S. Grébaut, will be found in ROC 16 (1911), pp. 78-84, 167-175, 225-233, 17 (1912), pp. 16-31, 133-144, 244-252, 337-346, 18 (1913), pp. 69-78, 19 (1914), pp. 324-330, 20 (1915-17), pp. 33-37, 424-430, 21 (1918), pp. 246-252, 22 (1920), pp. 22-28, 113-117, 395-400, 26 (1927-28), pp. 22-31. The ROC volumes are online. Unfortunately the article did not make clear -- at least to me -- whether this was considered part of the NT. UPDATE: Looking at Grébaut's article in ROC16 (1911), he says: Quote:
|
|
02-05-2010, 12:44 PM | #3 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
|
I've now had a look at Metzger's Canon of the New Testament which confirms my impression that the book above is the "Clement" sometimes listed as canonical in the Ethiopian church.
I've also read Metzger's book on the versions, on the Ethiopic versions, but this does not mention the work. What did come out of this, tho, was that little reliable is known about the Ethiopic bible. I have a feeling that the "canon" stuff may be little more reliable. All the best, Roger Pearse |
02-06-2010, 04:19 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 740
|
Roger to the rescue, again!
Thanks man! |
02-07-2010, 08:13 AM | #5 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mondcivitan Republic
Posts: 2,550
|
The Ethiopic Orthodox Tewahedo Church is essentially the modern Ethiopic Orthodox Church, which standardized worship on one standard proposed by bishop Abuna Salama, under the authority of Emperor Tewodoros.
Tewodros and his religious policy 1855-1868The Ethiopian Orthodox Church has a book purportedly written by Peter to Clement: 3. Clement (Qälëmentos) is a book in seven parts, communicated by Peter to Clement.[13] It is not the Roman or Corinthian correspondence, nor one of the parts of Sinodos, (namely Te'ezaz, Gessew or Abtelis, which are sometimes called 1, 2 and 3 Clement), nor part of the Syriac Octateuch of Clement.Another site, specifically labeled that of the Ethiopic Orthodox Tewahedo Church, has a complete list of sacred books. http://www.ethiopianorthodox.org/eng...cal/books.html It looks like that is a "letter" from Peter, not Paul. DCH Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|