Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
10-11-2006, 05:15 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 740
|
Quick question: Epiphanius passage lookup
Hi, all.
I've been searching the net for a passage from Epiphanius' Panarion. Earlychristianwritings.com has this to say: Helms argues: "So the gospel attributed, late in the second century, to John at Ephesus was viewed as an anti-gnostic, anti-Cerinthean work. But, very strangely, Epiphanius, in his book against the heretics, argues against those who actually believed that it was Cerinthus himself who wrote the Gospel of John! (Adv. Haer. 51.3.6). How could it be that the Fourth Gospel was at one time in its history regarded as the product of an Egyptian-trained gnostic, and at another time in its history regarded as composed for the very purpose of attacking this same gnostic? I think the answer is plausible that in an early, now-lost version, the Fourth Gospel could well have been read in a Cerinthean, gnostic fashion, but that at Ephesus a revision of it was produced (we now call it the Gospel of John) that put this gospel back into the Christian mainstream." So, I'd like to look up Adv. Haer. 51.3.6--except I can't find anything called "Adv. Haer." attributed to Epiphanius. I'm assuming what I'm looking for, then, is from Panarion. There is no full text of Panarion on the net, but I did find some excerpts. Among them was this passage: 51. Alogi, or so I have named them, who reject the Gospel of John and the eternal divine Word in it, who has descended from the Father. They do not accept either John's Gospel itself, or his Revelation. That's all I can find, and it doesn't mention Cerinthus. Can anyone help me out with the passage I'm seeking? Thanks in advance! |
10-11-2006, 05:46 PM | #2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
|
Panarion is Adv. Haer. The full title is Adversus Haereses, and is the other name for Panarion. I'll have to check to see if my library has a full copy, which I believe they might.
|
10-11-2006, 06:08 PM | #3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Greetings all,
Epiphanius (means "above the light" or something?) is possibly the most significant early Christian writer that is NOT available online. It would be great if someone could make it available - surely there is a English version out of copyright somewhere? (Another work would be Philostratus - I wonder if Mountain Man will ever finish his version?) The word "Panarion" means something like "medicine chest" I think - not unlike Clement's "Stromata" (a "patchwork") - meaning a varied collection of items. Was "Panarion" a formal title, or sort of a nickname? Iasion |
10-11-2006, 06:32 PM | #4 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,289
|
Quote:
There is, to my knowledge, no full English translation of it online (but don't quote me on this). There is a 3 vol English translation by F. Williams (Vol 1 Leiden 1987, Vols 2 and 3 Leiden 1994 and an Italian translation (with Greek text and commentary) by C. Riggi that was published in Rome in 1967. I can give you the Greek text if you wish. JG |
|
10-11-2006, 06:38 PM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 740
|
Quote:
|
|
10-11-2006, 07:00 PM | #6 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
|
|
10-11-2006, 07:04 PM | #7 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,289
|
Quote:
Are you certain the reference is correct? Could it be that there's a mix up with Irenaeus' Ad. Haer? JG |
|
10-11-2006, 07:19 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 740
|
|
10-11-2006, 10:32 PM | #9 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 220
|
Here's Williams' translation at 51.3.6:
For they [the Alogi] offer excuses (for their behavior). Knowing, as they do, that St. John was an apostle and the Lord's beloved, that the Lord rightly revealed the mysteries to him, and that he leaned upon his breast, they are ashamed to contradict him and try to object to these mysteries for a different reason. For they say that they ["the books in which St. John actually proclaimed his Gospel"] are not John's composition but Cerinthus', and have no right to a place in the church. |
10-11-2006, 11:03 PM | #10 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,307
|
The corresponding Greek is:
προφασίζονται γὰρ οὗτοι, αἰσχυνόμενοι ἀντιλέγειν τῷ ἁγίῳ Ἰωάννῃ διὰ τὸ εἰδέναι αὐτοὺς τὸν αὐτὸν ἐν ἀριθμῷ τῶν ἀποστόλων ὄντα καὶ ηγαπημένον ὑπὸ τοῦ κυρίου, ᾧ ἀξίως τὰ μυστήρια ἀπεκάλυπτεν καὶ ἐπὶ τὸ στῆθος αὐτοῦ ἀνέπεσε, καὶ ἑτέρως αὐτὰ ἀνατρέπειν πειρῶνται. λέγουσι γὰρ μὴ εἶναι αὐτὰ Ἰωάννου ἀλλὰ Κηρίνθου καὶ οὐκ ἄξια αὐτά φασιν εἶναι ἐν ἐκκλησίᾳ. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|