FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-28-2009, 05:34 AM   #91
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Pittsfield, Mass
Posts: 24,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JaronK View Post
Why, exactly, is it not "good for" them to allow them the right to do that?
As you mention, he pretty much parses white supremacist rhetoric, realigned to gays. I suspect that any arguments he can offer for gay marriage will echo the ones offered a few years back against interracial marriage.

They said that such marriages would be infertile, or that it would bring white family lines to an end, slurs about the superiors mixing with the lessors, concerns about the economic impacts (There, it was real estate values, now i hear people complaining that married gays will take undue advantage of company insurance policies...), and bible verses are offered.

In fact, Romney spent some time trying to prevent gay marriages in Mass by using an old law that was set up because of interracial marriage prohibitions.

But hey, maybe he can come up with something original!

:eating_popcorn: :eating_popcorn:
Keith&Co. is offline  
Old 03-28-2009, 08:04 PM   #92
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11,525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IamJoseph View Post

Source please?
Moses had a magic stick. Magic sticks don't exist. Therefor, wielders of magic sticks don't exist. My source is the book you worship.

Quote:
Originally Posted by IamJoseph View Post
My research says there is more evidence fr Moses than JC. Yes/no?
Arguing that there is more evidence for Moses than Jesus or Peter Pan isn't very compelling. All you have are ridiculous stories in a book filled with nonsense from start to finish.

That isn't evidence of the absurd, regardless of how many rivers, mountains, or ancient kings are mentioned, any more than mentioning Pilate, Herod, or Jerusalem makes the nonsense about Jesus real.
spamandham is offline  
Old 03-28-2009, 08:08 PM   #93
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11,525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IamJoseph View Post
Sure. But everyone does not reproduce. Therein is the rub. :wave:
Reproduction isn't an existential issue. If the human race ends when/after we die (and it eventually will), that has no impact on our lives.

(I'm guessing that you think your nonsense nonpoints somehow make sense if you end every post with a :wave:?)
spamandham is offline  
Old 03-29-2009, 01:21 PM   #94
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 2,608
Default

In ancient days(2000+) years ago, reproduction WAS an existential issue. Homosexuality was part of the lifestyle and culture among Egyptians, Assyrians, and whatever other people. But...the lawgivers for Israel saw the need for lots of children who would grow up to become warriors and take land. Israel could not survive if same sex couples became the majority lifestyle. And Israelites were commanded to increase their birthrate -"be fruitful and multiply". Sons of Judah were killed[by Yahweh] because they spilled their seed on the ground instead of impregnating a woman.

So it seems that homosexuality itself was not specifically the offense, but unwillingness to reproduce children for war was at the heart of the command.
storytime is offline  
Old 03-29-2009, 01:30 PM   #95
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Pittsfield, Mass
Posts: 24,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spamandham View Post
(I'm guessing that you think your nonsense nonpoints somehow make sense if you end every post with a :wave:?)
I always got the impression when sugarhitman did it, that it meant he'd put that particular issue, whatever issue, to rest, wave bye-bye, there's nothing more to be said on the topic.

I guess there's no 'so there' icon.
Keith&Co. is offline  
Old 03-29-2009, 05:39 PM   #96
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Hillsborough, NJ
Posts: 3,551
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by storytime View Post
The scripture makes the point that Israelites were not chosen because they were more righteous than other non Israelite people, but that they were chosen because they were "in their blood". Whatever that means. Maybe they were killing each other and why they were given laws for civility among themselves. Remember, the laws of Moses was not intended for any other people. "Thou shalt not kill" holds its meaning in the Israelite community of tribes; Israelites were commanded not to kill each other. However, it was permitted for Israelites to kill other non-Israelite people, thus God commanded them to kill without pity and spare none in the land of Canaan.
Interesting point, it probably is worth noting that the commandment can also be translated as .. "not murder." I'm not fluent in Hebrew by any means but I think the word used "Tirzakh" is somewhere in between the two English meanings.

Regarding the homosexuality issue, it seems that the negative argument is now equating homosexuality with masturbation, or perhaps even heterosexual sex where some kind of birth control is used. I don't see where these sins are too serious.

I remember on Religulous that Bill Maher interviewed a "reformed homosexual", I'm not aware of any people who have publicly renounced masturbating because it is a sin. Seems like a double standard.
semiopen is offline  
Old 03-30-2009, 06:53 AM   #97
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 2,608
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by semiopen View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by storytime View Post
The scripture makes the point that Israelites were not chosen because they were more righteous than other non Israelite people, but that they were chosen because they were "in their blood". Whatever that means. Maybe they were killing each other and why they were given laws for civility among themselves. Remember, the laws of Moses was not intended for any other people. "Thou shalt not kill" holds its meaning in the Israelite community of tribes; Israelites were commanded not to kill each other. However, it was permitted for Israelites to kill other non-Israelite people, thus God commanded them to kill without pity and spare none in the land of Canaan.
Interesting point, it probably is worth noting that the commandment can also be translated as .. "not murder." I'm not fluent in Hebrew by any means but I think the word used "Tirzakh" is somewhere in between the two English meanings.

Regarding the homosexuality issue, it seems that the negative argument is now equating homosexuality with masturbation, or perhaps even heterosexual sex where some kind of birth control is used.

Quote:
I don't see where these sins are too serious.
In OT, those sins carried the death penalty. God himself killed his own people for not producing children for his namesake - Israel.

I remember on Religulous that Bill Maher interviewed a "reformed homosexual", I'm not aware of any people who have publicly renounced masturbating because it is a sin. Seems like a double standard.
I've yet to see the movie and only a few clips from promo's.
storytime is offline  
Old 03-30-2009, 10:40 PM   #98
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: AUSTRALIA
Posts: 2,265
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by storytime View Post
But...the lawgivers for Israel saw the need for lots of children who would grow up to become warriors
LOL! This law is the first of the 613 laws in the Hebrew bibe - appearing in Genesis before the advent of Israel or any religions. It applies to all humanity.

Quote:
and take land.
My history research says Jews have never stolen anyone's land in all their 4000 year history - and that her own land was constantly stolen - specially by a new kid in the block proclaiming NO OTHER RELIGION CAN PREVAIL IN ARABIA'! Nor do the Jews have a history of dumping mosques on other peoples' sacred sites [Jerusalem, India, Europe, Asia, etc] - then bodly claiming the Jerusalem Temple was a zionist plot - ya mean like 9/11 yah?! Whatzamatter - Haj Sq Mecca loosing its lustre as # 1 sacred spot!? :wave:
IamJoseph is offline  
Old 03-30-2009, 10:47 PM   #99
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: AUSTRALIA
Posts: 2,265
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by spamandham View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by IamJoseph View Post
Sure. But everyone does not reproduce. Therein is the rub. :wave:
Reproduction isn't an existential issue. If the human race ends when/after we die (and it eventually will), that has no impact on our lives.
Is that a non-nonsense? Does negation impact our lives - you think! :wave:
IamJoseph is offline  
Old 03-30-2009, 10:52 PM   #100
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11,525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IamJoseph View Post
Is that a non-nonsense? Does negation impact our lives - you think! :wave:
No, it's just plain old nonsense.

a. Homosexuality has existed for all of human history, and population continues to grow exponentially.

b. The human race *will* some day cease to exist. It matters not to my existence whether that happens 1000 years from now or a trillion years from now. I'll be dead long before either.

:wave: (not sure what this is supposed to mean, but I assume it's a freindly gesture since you end every post with it)
spamandham is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:21 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.