Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
08-29-2004, 12:06 AM | #81 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: East U.S.A.
Posts: 883
|
Quote:
Jesus Christ is the Son of God; God is the Father of Jesus Christ. That's the reason why you can't find anything there that says Jesus was God (Jesus is His Son). Why would you think they are the same? |
|
08-29-2004, 02:07 AM | #82 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: England
Posts: 5,629
|
Quote:
|
|
08-29-2004, 02:09 AM | #83 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: England
Posts: 5,629
|
Quote:
|
|
08-29-2004, 03:16 PM | #84 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: East U.S.A.
Posts: 883
|
Quote:
Jesus, the Son of God, was "in the body" as "in a man's body" (Luke 2:11-15; Hebrews 2:9). |
|
08-29-2004, 03:51 PM | #85 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Monroeville, Ohio, USA
Posts: 440
|
a little hint, Jesus was crucified and did survive. He was not the same person after the crucifixion. This is due to trauma, and, some hush money was paid to Pilate, so he had to lay low for a while.
When you are stabbed and blood flows then you are not dead. If he was dead he would not have said "Oh father, why have you forsaken me?" You know, dead men don't talk? His father, Jonathan Annas could have paid a bribe then and there, But Jonathan chose to let Jesus suffer. A bribe was paid later. offa |
08-29-2004, 04:49 PM | #86 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: East U.S.A.
Posts: 883
|
Quote:
I'd love to see that which goes beyond your hint. Spoken like a true atheist, though. Are you referring to Annas, the father-in-law of Caiaphas? |
|
08-29-2004, 09:58 PM | #87 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: East U.S.A.
Posts: 883
|
Quote:
Are you still with us, Offa? Is there another Annas? |
|
08-30-2004, 08:50 AM | #88 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: I Owe the World an Apology
Posts: 890
|
Slavery: God's will or not?
This thread has been (mostly) very entertaining and enlightening.
However, the one idea that has gotten under my skin is the issue of slavery. 1. Are there passages in the bible that condemn slavery? -jim |
08-30-2004, 04:59 PM | #89 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: East U.S.A.
Posts: 883
|
Quote:
There's more information on this on the following page: http://www.brfwitness.org/Articles/2003v38n1.htm |
|
08-30-2004, 05:27 PM | #90 | ||||||||||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: A world less bright without WinAce.
Posts: 7,482
|
Just a couple of highlights:
#1) Budgie, to answer your question, NO. The bible very specifically does not ever condemn slavery as an institution. It does make sure that Israelite slaves are able to be freed, and not mistreated, and the article highlighted by Inq. certainly doesn't ever draw attention to the double standard there, but it does not discourage slavery of other peoples. In fact it is very explicit in its granting of permission to have slaves. "Can we have slaves?" Ask the Israelites. "Yes." says God, and adds: "And as long as they are not Israelites, you may beat them, hold them for their entire lives, commit their children to servitude, and will them to be inherited by future generations of your family." #2) Let's look at some highlights of the linked article: Quote:
Israelites: "Hey god, may we take slaves?" God: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
In fact, in the NT we specifically have 5 instances of direction by god to slaves, ordering them to grin and bear it. Quote:
Now, for an interesting lesson, can anyone spot the Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc fallacy in this: Quote:
For that, I refer back to the places where god explicitly grants permission for Israelites to take slaves, and then keep them for life. If my son wants a cookie, and I tell him: "Yes, you may take a cookie, but not a chocolate chip one," then it can be said that I approve of my son having a cookie. When the Israelites asked: "God, may we take slaves?" and God said: "Yes, you may take slaves, but not other Israelites," then it can be said that he approves. The fact that the bulk of humanity today has found a moral compass far superior to God's has nothing at all to do with the spread of Christianity, but perhaps something good about the human spirit. |
||||||||||||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|