FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-09-2005, 09:22 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,635
Default Is the Secret Gospel of Mark a Modern Forgery Based on a Cheesy Christian Novel?

I'm not an expert on the Secret Gospel of Mark, but one aspect of the story that interested me was how Smith's purported discovery bears some stricking similarities to a Christian adventure/romance novel published a few years prior to his finding the SGM: The Mystery of Mar Saba by J.H. Hunter.

It seems likely that Smith would have at least heard of this book prior to his cataloging of the manuscripts of the Mar Saba Monastery that prompted his reported discovery of the SGM. It was published in 1940 and went through at least nine reprints. It was quite popular throughout the English-speaking world.

Having finally read the book, I posted about the similarities and suspicions they may raise. Even if you don't by into the claims of forgery, you can save yourself the purchase of the book by reading about it. I give away the ending and several plot points.
Layman is offline  
Old 07-10-2005, 09:54 AM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,146
Default

Hi, Layman,

So assuming that Smith was a forger, and assuming that he knew about THE MYSTERY OF MAR SABA by J.H. Hunter, why would he still chose this particular monastery to plant his forgery in? Do you think he really wanted to be caught and have his career ruined?

Yours,

Yuri.
Yuri Kuchinsky is offline  
Old 07-10-2005, 12:40 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,562
Default

If one assumes a forgery then the fit between Smith and the book looks good.
On the other hand if you assume no forgery then the fit is not that good.

If one wants to forge a document than the monastery is a good place to do it from. But the monastery is also a good place to find an authentic document as well. This could be a coincidence.

I believe that the letter is a forgery.
What is really astonishing to me is the kind of logic used by Layman here.
It takes so little for him to doubt.
But when defending Christianity even far stronger logical arguements gives Layman no doubt whatsoever.
This duality has become Layman's trademark. The man is definitely capable of logic but please do not use this kind of logic on Christian beliefs.

So a vague resemblance between two stories is enough to cast doubt.
Let's see now.
Children under two years of age were killed when Jesus was born but Jesus managed to escape.
Can we think of a similar story?

There are more but I have said enough.
NOGO is offline  
Old 07-10-2005, 01:16 PM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,635
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NOGO
If one assumes a forgery then the fit between Smith and the book looks good.
On the other hand if you assume no forgery then the fit is not that good.

If one wants to forge a document than the monastery is a good place to do it from. But the monastery is also a good place to find an authentic document as well. This could be a coincidence.

I believe that the letter is a forgery.
What is really astonishing to me is the kind of logic used by Layman here.
It takes so little for him to doubt.
But when defending Christianity even far stronger logical arguements gives Layman no doubt whatsoever.
This duality has become Layman's trademark. The man is definitely capable of logic but please do not use this kind of logic on Christian beliefs.

So a vague resemblance between two stories is enough to cast doubt.
Let's see now.
Children under two years of age were killed when Jesus was born but Jesus managed to escape.
Can we think of a similar story?

There are more but I have said enough.
Actually, it is the similarities (not vague in my opinion) combined with the rest of the indicia of forgery that makes me skeptical.

But leave it to you to distort my comments. If you even bothered to read them.
Layman is offline  
Old 07-10-2005, 01:21 PM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Let's focus on the topic and avoid tangents about the thinking of individual members.

Thanks in advance,

Amaleq13, BC&H moderator
Amaleq13 is offline  
Old 07-10-2005, 05:53 PM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the dark places of the world
Posts: 8,093
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Layman
Actually, it is the similarities (not vague in my opinion) combined with the rest of the indicia of forgery that makes me skeptical.
What do you consider to be "the rest of the indicia of forgery"?

Specifically, your assumption that Morton probably read the book seems weak. Stating that "the book was available in the English speaking world" seems quite a stretch, even given the topic. Especially since the book was not a critical volume aimed at academics or institutions of higher learning; it was a dimestore novel.

An article by the son of the author of that dimestore novel:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot/18527

Quote:
Few scholars were as dogmatic as Donald Harmon Akenson of Queen's University, who called Mark's "other" Gospel a blatant forgery: "a forgery, and not one that requires forensic methods and high magnification to detect. Anyone who could not spot it as a forgery from a height of 3,000 feet should not be allowed to make authoritative pronouncements on the authenticity of texts."

But now a Canadian academic, Scott Brown, a lecturer in Christian origins at the University of Toronto, has written a book sure to re-ignite the debate. In Mark's Other Gospel: Rethinking Morton Smith's Controversial Discovery (Wilfred Laurier Press, 2005) Brown offers a thorough, dispassionate, and meticulously researched defence of the likely authenticity of the Clement of Alexander letter. At a minimum, Brown makes a persuasive case that -- scholarly bombast aside -- forgery has not been proven.
And apparently he's heard of you, although he gets your credentials quite wrong. I wonder how that happened:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot/18527

Quote:
Last year, an American theologian named Robert Price, writing in the academic journal Biblical Research, called attention to the similarities between Morton Smith's "discovery" and my father's book.
Sauron is offline  
Old 07-10-2005, 06:33 PM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Central Indiana
Posts: 5,641
Default

This could be similar to the situation of a famous supposed past-life person (sorry, can't remember the name) whose earlier life turned out to be from a novel she'd read and long forgotten (or else she was a fraud). Anyone here remember her name?
EssEff is offline  
Old 07-10-2005, 07:05 PM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,307
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scifinerdgrl
This could be similar to the situation of a famous supposed past-life person (sorry, can't remember the name) whose earlier life turned out to be from a novel she'd read and long forgotten (or else she was a fraud). Anyone here remember her name?
Bridey Murphy, perhaps? Or maybe, Anna Anderson's claim to be princess Anastasia, the daughter of Czar Nicholas II?
S.C.Carlson is offline  
Old 07-10-2005, 07:16 PM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Central Indiana
Posts: 5,641
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by S.C.Carlson
Bridey Murphy, perhaps? Or maybe, Anna Anderson's claim to be princess Anastasia, the daughter of Czar Nicholas II?
Bridey Murphy sounds right. She's not the one who supposedly channeled Chopin in her piano playing, right? I don't think it's that one. *sighs* There are so many frauds it's hard to keep track of them.
EssEff is offline  
Old 07-10-2005, 07:32 PM   #10
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sauron
. . .

And apparently he's heard of you, although he gets your credentials quite wrong. I wonder how that happened:
Quote:
Last year, an American theologian named Robert Price, writing in the academic journal Biblical Research, called attention to the similarities between Morton Smith's "discovery" and my father's book.
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot/18527
Careful!!

That's Robert M Price, former fundamentalist now atheist Biblical scholar with one PhD in New Testament and one in Systematic Theology, currently teaching in North Carolina.

He is definitely not Layman.
Toto is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:53 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.