|  | Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. | 
|  08-20-2012, 09:56 PM | #1 | |
| Veteran Member Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: USA, Missouri 
					Posts: 3,070
				 |  Stop the NO RESURRECTION in short Mark nonsense 
			
			Mark 16:2-7  Quote: 
 It is time to stop claiming that the shorter version of GMark doesn't support a resurrection, or that it is about the disciples never believing Jesus had been resurrected. Both claims are pure NONSENSE. | |
|   | 
|  08-20-2012, 10:13 PM | #2 | 
| Regular Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: NW United States 
					Posts: 155
				 |   
			
			Ha ha, sorry that's an empty tomb story. No one saw jesus stinking corpse come out of the tomb | 
|   | 
|  08-20-2012, 10:41 PM | #3 | 
| Veteran Member Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: USA, Missouri 
					Posts: 3,070
				 |   | 
|   | 
|  08-21-2012, 05:23 AM | #4 | ||
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: South Pacific 
					Posts: 559
				 |   Quote: 
 The stories are more likely to be myth-fiction. | ||
|   | 
|  08-21-2012, 09:55 AM | #5 | ||
| Veteran Member Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Bordeaux France 
					Posts: 2,796
				 |   Quote: 
 A god can be resurrected, not a historical person. | ||
|   | 
|  08-21-2012, 10:14 AM | #6 | ||
| Veteran Member Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Nazareth 
					Posts: 2,357
				 |   Quote: 
 As Yeshu Barra would say after seeing ignorance/denial of the next verse and ending explicitly contradicting your point, and instead substituting shouting and repetition, "Sounds like Deja Jew all over again." I've given up on Ted and think he would be much better suited at Tweeb. For those who need points sharply explained, the whole point of "Mark" is that those close to Jesus did not believe him. Isn't it obvious that the subject of "Mark" was not convincing (per "Mark", what better source). "Mark" is what was convincing. Joseph | ||
|   | 
|  08-21-2012, 10:41 AM | #7 | |
| Veteran Member Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: USA, Missouri 
					Posts: 3,070
				 |   Quote: 
 Your response is nearly unintelligible above. Try making a reasoned argument. I can understand reason. | |
|   | 
|  08-21-2012, 04:47 PM | #8 | 
| Regular Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: NW United States 
					Posts: 155
				 |   
			
			There is no resurrection story. It goes from a crucifixion to burial and skipping a resurrection story right to an empty tomb with someone claiming that jesus has risen. There is no description of the resurrection and there is no jesus appearance in the short ending of mark. You are reading a story of the empty tomb claiming that jesus resurrected and the people's reaction to that claim. The lazarus story included a resurrection story. | 
|   | 
|  08-21-2012, 05:14 PM | #9 | 
| Veteran Member Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: On the path of knowledge 
					Posts: 8,889
				 |   
			
			Is there any account of the actual resurrection in any accepted canonical source? Who was present at the moment of the Resurrection, and reports seeing Jesus come back to life, get up, unwrap the death shroud, and walk or fly out of that tomb? Has 'Christian' belief ever required that there had to be an independent observer present on the scene at the moment of Resurrection, for holding a belief in the reality of Jesus' Resurrection to be a possibility? | 
|   | 
|  08-21-2012, 05:33 PM | #10 | 
| Veteran Member Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Philadelphia, PA 
					Posts: 3,387
				 |   
			
			Whatcha gonna do if we don't stop this nonsense?   Call us names?  Go tell your dad?
		 | 
|   | 
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
| 
 |