FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-06-2007, 03:51 PM   #1
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default Ehrman's latest book: God's Problem: How the Bible Fails at Theodicy

God's Problem: How the Bible Fails to Answer Our Most Important Question--Why We Suffer (or via: amazon.co.uk)

This title will be released on February 19, 2008.

Discussed here by Stanley Fish on his New York Times blog.
Quote:
Bart D. Ehrman is a professor of religious studies and his book is titled “God’s Problem: How the Bible Fails to Answer Our Most Important Question – Why We Suffer.” A graduate of Princeton Theological Seminary, Ehrman trained to be a scholar of New Testament Studies and a minister. Born-again as a teenager, devoted to the scriptures (he memorized entire books of the New Testament), strenuously devout, he nevertheless lost his faith because, he reports, “I could no longer reconcile the claims of faith with the fact of life . . . I came to the point where I simply could not believe that there is a good and kindly disposed Ruler who is in charge.” “The problem of suffering,” he recalls, “became for me the problem of faith.”

Much of the book is taken up with Ehrman’s examination of biblical passages that once gave him solace, but that now deliver only unanswerable questions: “Given [the] theology of selection – that God had chosen the people of Israel to be in a special relationship with him – what were Ancient Israelite thinkers to suppose when things did not go as planned or expected? . . . . How were they to explain the fact that the people of God suffered from famine, drought, and pestilence?”

Ehrman knows and surveys the standard answers to these questions – God is angry at a sinful, disobedient people; suffering is redemptive, as Christ demonstrated on the cross; evil and suffering exist so that God can make good out of them; suffering induces humility and is an antidote to pride; suffering is a test of faith – but he finds them unpersuasive and as horrible in their way as the events they fail to explain: “If God tortures, maims and murders people just to see how they will react – to see if they will not blame him, when in fact he is to blame – then this does not seem to me to be a God worthy of worship.”
Toto is offline  
Old 11-06-2007, 04:36 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: 36078
Posts: 849
Default

This sounds like a tough read, but I think I'll tackle it when it's released.

I read C.S. Lewis' The Problem With Pain, though, so I think it would be a good comparison to revisit it, then compare with Ehrman's take.
Cege is offline  
Old 11-06-2007, 05:43 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,674
Default

Seems like a silly premise for a book. Why go into all this nonsense about God and not just go strait to explaining the text from the human point of view, and how and why the Jewish people wrote what they wrote and invented the God that they did.

How can he "blame God", when God didn't write the book in the first place?
Malachi151 is offline  
Old 11-07-2007, 06:03 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 932
Default

If the book is simply Ehrman's personal exposition on the problem of theodicy and the Bible's insufficiency in dealing with it (as opposed to an academic survey of the issue), I would prefer that he not devote his resources to a "popular" topic at the loss to other work.
gregor is offline  
Old 11-07-2007, 06:17 AM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Surrey, England
Posts: 1,255
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gregor View Post
If the book is simply Ehrman's personal exposition on the problem of theodicy and the Bible's insufficiency in dealing with it (as opposed to an academic survey of the issue), I would prefer that he not devote his resources to a "popular" topic at the loss to other work.
Me, too. Although I like his writing style and insights, his talents seem wasted in writing a book on theodicy. Any of us could do that.

What we need are more real biblical scholars educating the rest of us on what can be learned from biblical criticism.
Ray Moscow is offline  
Old 11-07-2007, 08:53 AM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
Default

I was wondering what part of text critical studies equips him specially to write on this, in a way that being a professional software developer would not. So evidently secure, well-off, and successful a person is perhaps not best placed to complain that a non-existent God permits "suffering", after all.
Roger Pearse is offline  
Old 11-07-2007, 02:29 PM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bli Bli
Posts: 3,135
Default

At least Ehrman has people's ear, to some degree. AFAIR there is no place in the bible where it explains why people suffer in any broad perspective (many have recognized that the metaphysical teaching of Christ or Paul do touch on how to alleviate ones own suffering though).
And so many people are left with the idea that the bible is God's inerrant word and therefore the answer to the question can be extracted from it.
The problem is, as Ehrman found, the answers christian theology can give can be deeply unsatisfying or even cruel.

So it might be a positive that someone who is to some degree in the public eye can give some encouragement to look beyond some of the less satisfying options to find a better approach to this earthly life.
judge is offline  
Old 11-07-2007, 02:44 PM   #8
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Pearse View Post
.... So evidently secure, well-off, and successful a person is perhaps not best placed to complain that a non-existent God permits "suffering", after all.
Are you saying he is not allowed to empathize with those who are not secure and well-off?

I gather he gets most of his examples from the Bible in any case.
Toto is offline  
Old 11-08-2007, 06:25 AM   #9
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: London
Posts: 176
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gregor View Post
If the book is simply Ehrman's personal exposition on the problem of theodicy and the Bible's insufficiency in dealing with it (as opposed to an academic survey of the issue), I would prefer that he not devote his resources to a "popular" topic at the loss to other work.
Erhman is a human being before he is a scholar. Surely the man has a right to exorcise his own demons if this book is indeed a personal exposition?
Ruhan is offline  
Old 11-08-2007, 07:15 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Between a rock and a hard place
Posts: 916
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Pearse View Post
I was wondering what part of text critical studies equips him specially to write on this, in a way that being a professional software developer would not. So evidently secure, well-off, and successful a person is perhaps not best placed to complain that a non-existent God permits "suffering", after all.
I have similar thoughts about former prison librarians and the topics they pretend to represent with authority.
MiddleMan is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:40 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.