FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-07-2007, 01:41 PM   #91
Moderator -
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 4,639
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elijah View Post
Story of Socrates

Socrates was told by an oracle that he was the smartest dude around
So he went around and tested all the towns folks insulting them along the way
He was tried for being a bad example to kids.
He was found guilty, then insults and mocks the jury of 500 at the sentencing and is given death by a larger margin then found him guilty.

If that sounds like the story of Christ to you then please please please re read the gospels.
A carpenter gets baptized by a religious fanatic and thinks he's the son of God.

He goes around insulting the religious authorities of his time, and partying with whores and drunks.

He's convicted of blasphemy and sedition and is actually guilty on both counts.

When he's knows he's going to get caught and executed, he cries like a bitch for God to save him.

While he's hanging on the cross, he whines some more that God didn't save him.

At least Socrates was man enough to take his medicine without being a crybaby.


It's pretty easy to caricaturize both stories, isn't it?
Quote:
At no point is it even eluded to that this is all part of some plan of Socrates.
There is likewise no reason to believe that the crucifixion was part of any plan by Jesus.
Quote:
He was an old man with an ego too big.
You say socrates had a big ego, but he wasn't the one going around saying he was God.
Quote:
Socrates suggested his own punishment at the trial and it was a petty sum of money.
Jesus tried to get out of any punishment at all.
Quote:
What exactly are the beliefs of Socrates, what did he die for, what was his message?
Tell the truth. Don't fear death. Annoy authority.
Diogenes the Cynic is offline  
Old 02-07-2007, 01:54 PM   #92
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MidWest
Posts: 1,894
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diogenes the Cynic View Post
A carpenter gets baptized by a religious fanatic and thinks he's the son of God.

He goes around insulting the religious authorities of his time, and partying with whores and drunks.

He's convicted of blasphemy and sedition and is actually guilty on both counts.

When he's knows he's going to get caught and executed, he cries like a bitch for God to save him.

While he's hanging on the cross, he whines some more that God didn't save him.

At least Socrates was man enough to take his medicine without being a crybaby.


It's pretty easy to caricaturize both stories, isn't it?
But did it help you to see any differences?


Quote:
There is likewise no reason to believe that the crucifixion was part of any plan by Jesus.
You could read the scripture if you like

Quote:
You say socrates had a big ego, but he wasn't the one going around saying he was God.
That wasn’t his claim.

Quote:
Jesus tried to get out of any punishment at all.
Wrong wrong wrong.

Quote:
Tell the truth. Don't fear death. Annoy authority.
Boy you don’t know Socrates at all do you? Socrates was about submission to authority. He was totally into the citizen being like a child of the State. What truth did he ever speak? Old men never fear death just comes with old age.
Elijah is offline  
Old 02-07-2007, 02:19 PM   #93
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MidWest
Posts: 1,894
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by driver8 View Post
Your logic is interesting. You apparently don't believe in the divinity of Jesus (nor do I) yet you seem quite convinced that there really was a crucifixion event. If you don't believe the former, in what do you base your belief in the latter? The evidence for the two is the same. I suspect you're making the assumption that there must be a historical core to the Jesus story and there really was a crucifixion. Without belief in the NT, how can you make any judgement about Jesus' supposed actions or motivations to even classify him as a martyr? He might just as well have been run down in the street as crucified. You're selectively choosing the parts you want to believe, so you've damaged the very basis for your argument, and you're left with making assumptions.
I believe in the NT but I believe in my interpretation of it. I believe people have a poor understanding of what Christ was trying to do and reduce his story to an older myth because of a lack of insight.

I believe Jesus willfully went to the cross because he believed his death would change the world… and 2000 thousand years latter his name is the only name from that time that anyone remembers. Dude called it, that’s why I believe. No miracles, no resurrection.


Quote:
Oh, so there was a grand plan? But no genie? What is the grand plan of the mortal Jesus? What is the cause this martyr died for, and what is your reference for describing this cause?
The Son of Man has always stood against the Rulers of Man. Mosses Elijah and Jesus were all trying to free us from earthy rulers. Pharaoh King Emperor. Jesus made an offer to the people, you can either sever a King who dies for you, or the Kings who send you to die for them.

Render unto Caesar what is Caesar is more then about paying your taxes, it’s about a revolution.
Elijah is offline  
Old 02-07-2007, 02:29 PM   #94
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 740
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elijah View Post
If I were Webster I guess: Someone who willingly orchestrates their own death, free of influence believing it will have some effect.

Not someone who is executed for being a jerk or died because they were in the wrong place at the wrong time and pride kept them from running.

The problem with defining martyr by using words instead of examples is that “willingly” and free of influence/freewill are difficult words to understand especially coming from my POV. You run into the same semantics problem as were having with the word martyr.

It’s more important that you see the difference between what happened to Socrates and what Jesus was trying to do.

Jesus was trying to get himself killed because it was part of some grand plan; Socrates was just executed for being a jerk.
I beg to differ, but you are mistaken on at least two points of fact: 1) The grand plan that Jesus was said to have is a mythical invention; it is highly unlikely that Jesus thought he was saving anyone by dying himself. It is further unknown whether Jesus expected to die or resisted his executioners, and in my personal opinion both counts seem unlikely. 2) Socrates was not executed "just...for being a jerk." He was put on trial for preaching his own philosophical beliefs, just like Jesus. And it was not pride which caused him to go along with the sentence, but rather a belief that he would continue on in an afterlife.

So it is that the differences you see do not actually exist. And that is why we do not share your opinion that Jesus is unique in those respects.
hatsoff is offline  
Old 02-07-2007, 02:39 PM   #95
Moderator -
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 4,639
Default

Elijah, your idisyncratic and self-serving little "interpretation" of the NT is all very cute, and I'm sure quite satisfying to you, but I hope you understand that it's of little or no use to any genuine historical criticism. Can you provide us with any kind of defined (and supported) historical theory or systematic analysis of the texts in question? Can you defend your hypothesis academically? can you even define it academically?

It sounds like you want us not only to accept the NT as evidence but to accept your particular interpretation of the NT. Make a case for why we should.
Diogenes the Cynic is offline  
Old 02-07-2007, 02:52 PM   #96
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MidWest
Posts: 1,894
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diogenes the Cynic View Post
Elijah, your idisyncratic and self-serving little "interpretation" of the NT is all very cute, and I'm sure quite satisfying to you, but I hope you understand that it's of little or no use to any genuine historical criticism. Can you provide us with any kind of defined (and supported) historical theory or systematic analysis of the texts in question? Can you defend your hypothesis academically? can you even define it academically?

It sounds like you want us not only to accept the NT as evidence but to accept your particular interpretation of the NT. Make a case for why we should.
Are we still talking about Socrates and Jesus? Not sure what you’re asking or looking for exactly. Am I allowed to use religious text for this little paper you want me to write for you?
Elijah is offline  
Old 02-07-2007, 02:55 PM   #97
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: The achingly beautiful San Fernando Valley
Posts: 2,206
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elijah View Post
Story of Socrates

Socrates was told by an oracle that he was the smartest dude around
So he went around and tested all the towns folks insulting them along the way
He was tried for being a bad example to kids.
He was found guilty, then insults and mocks the jury of 500 at the sentencing and is given death by a larger margin then found him guilty.

If that sounds like the story of Christ to you then please please please re read the gospels.

At no point is it even eluded to that this is all part of some plan of Socrates. He was an old man with an ego too big. Socrates suggested his own punishment at the trial and it was a petty sum of money.

What exactly are the beliefs of Socrates, what did he die for, what was his message?
Gee, you really seem to have it in for poor Socrates. What did he do, run over your cat or something? :huh:
windsofchange is offline  
Old 02-07-2007, 03:07 PM   #98
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MidWest
Posts: 1,894
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hatsoff View Post
I beg to differ, but you are mistaken on at least two points of fact: 1) The grand plan that Jesus was said to have is a mythical invention; it is highly unlikely that Jesus thought he was saving anyone by dying himself. It is further unknown whether Jesus expected to die or resisted his executioners, and in my personal opinion both counts seem unlikely. 2) Socrates was not executed "just...for being a jerk." He was put on trial for preaching his own philosophical beliefs, just like Jesus. And it was not pride which caused him to go along with the sentence, but rather a belief that he would continue on in an afterlife.

So it is that the differences you see do not actually exist. And that is why we do not share your opinion that Jesus is unique in those respects.
1) It’s obvious I believe he was more then just a mythical invention but that’s not really what this conversation is about.

2) Socrates was executed for being a jerk and insulting to his peers. If he would have gone into that trial and apologized or at least acted like an honorable individual he would have never been executed, but he insulted them and he was executed. An old man with too much pride is what made him go along with the sentencing.

If you see the story of Socrates as the same as Jesus it’s because you want to see them that way.
Elijah is offline  
Old 02-07-2007, 03:13 PM   #99
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: The achingly beautiful San Fernando Valley
Posts: 2,206
Default

This thread seems to have gotten just a wee bit sidetracked. Reminder: the topic is not "How are Jesus and Socrates alike?" but "Why would Jesus' apostles die for their cause?" If anyone wants to start a Jesus/Socrates smackdown thread you are welcome do do so. Thanks!
windsofchange is offline  
Old 02-07-2007, 03:16 PM   #100
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MidWest
Posts: 1,894
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by windsofchange View Post
Gee, you really seem to have it in for poor Socrates. What did he do, run over your cat or something? :huh:
If Socrates was real and not just a character of Plato’s. He is pretty much the epitome of the town idiot in my mind. Big Big fan of Plato’s but how Plato paints Socrates is a man who died honorable because he couldn’t live that way.
Elijah is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:36 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.