Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
02-07-2007, 01:41 PM | #91 | |||||
Moderator -
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 4,639
|
Quote:
He goes around insulting the religious authorities of his time, and partying with whores and drunks. He's convicted of blasphemy and sedition and is actually guilty on both counts. When he's knows he's going to get caught and executed, he cries like a bitch for God to save him. While he's hanging on the cross, he whines some more that God didn't save him. At least Socrates was man enough to take his medicine without being a crybaby. It's pretty easy to caricaturize both stories, isn't it? Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||
02-07-2007, 01:54 PM | #92 | |||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MidWest
Posts: 1,894
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||
02-07-2007, 02:19 PM | #93 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MidWest
Posts: 1,894
|
Quote:
I believe Jesus willfully went to the cross because he believed his death would change the world… and 2000 thousand years latter his name is the only name from that time that anyone remembers. Dude called it, that’s why I believe. No miracles, no resurrection. Quote:
Render unto Caesar what is Caesar is more then about paying your taxes, it’s about a revolution. |
||
02-07-2007, 02:29 PM | #94 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 740
|
Quote:
So it is that the differences you see do not actually exist. And that is why we do not share your opinion that Jesus is unique in those respects. |
|
02-07-2007, 02:39 PM | #95 |
Moderator -
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 4,639
|
Elijah, your idisyncratic and self-serving little "interpretation" of the NT is all very cute, and I'm sure quite satisfying to you, but I hope you understand that it's of little or no use to any genuine historical criticism. Can you provide us with any kind of defined (and supported) historical theory or systematic analysis of the texts in question? Can you defend your hypothesis academically? can you even define it academically?
It sounds like you want us not only to accept the NT as evidence but to accept your particular interpretation of the NT. Make a case for why we should. |
02-07-2007, 02:52 PM | #96 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MidWest
Posts: 1,894
|
Quote:
|
|
02-07-2007, 02:55 PM | #97 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: The achingly beautiful San Fernando Valley
Posts: 2,206
|
Quote:
|
|
02-07-2007, 03:07 PM | #98 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MidWest
Posts: 1,894
|
Quote:
2) Socrates was executed for being a jerk and insulting to his peers. If he would have gone into that trial and apologized or at least acted like an honorable individual he would have never been executed, but he insulted them and he was executed. An old man with too much pride is what made him go along with the sentencing. If you see the story of Socrates as the same as Jesus it’s because you want to see them that way. |
|
02-07-2007, 03:13 PM | #99 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: The achingly beautiful San Fernando Valley
Posts: 2,206
|
This thread seems to have gotten just a wee bit sidetracked. Reminder: the topic is not "How are Jesus and Socrates alike?" but "Why would Jesus' apostles die for their cause?" If anyone wants to start a Jesus/Socrates smackdown thread you are welcome do do so. Thanks!
|
02-07-2007, 03:16 PM | #100 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MidWest
Posts: 1,894
|
If Socrates was real and not just a character of Plato’s. He is pretty much the epitome of the town idiot in my mind. Big Big fan of Plato’s but how Plato paints Socrates is a man who died honorable because he couldn’t live that way.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|