Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
12-20-2011, 05:25 PM | #1 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
|
the disciples were called "Chrestians" first (Codex Sinaiticus; Acts 11:26)
The Chrestians in Acts
According to the Codex Sinaiticus; Acts 11:26 ... "the disciples were first called Chrestians first in Antioch"If the disciples were called "Chrestians" first, then does anyone have any idea when the nation of "Chrestians" became known as the nation of "Christians"? SOURCE The Chrestians in Tacitus We see the same modus operandi in the 11th century manuscripts of Tacitus. See Tacitus on Chrest: Quote:
What's going on with the Chrestians in antiquity? Who are they? Can anyone explain the Chrestians morphing to Christians? |
|
12-20-2011, 09:10 PM | #2 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
It would appear that "Christians" were called ChrEstians by Romans based on "Ad Nationes" and the "Apology" attributed to an Apologetic source up to the end of the 2nd century and beyond.
Ad Nationes 1.3 Quote:
Quote:
|
||
12-21-2011, 01:01 AM | #3 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
Chrestianoi is once again a Latinism. The original term was Chrestoi. The terminology is NOT rooted in the pagan writings you adore so much (this adoration being prompted by your hatred of Christianity). The terminology is a Hebraism which is found throughout the Qumran material and OT in general. It means 'the upright' or 'the good' (even 'the righteous') and was probably a/the name the sectarians at Qumran called themselves.
|
12-21-2011, 05:36 AM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Bronx, NY
Posts: 945
|
Quote:
|
|
12-21-2011, 05:57 AM | #5 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
|
Quote:
|
|
12-21-2011, 10:02 AM | #6 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
Qumran materials are in Greek? This is a Greek (language) term, isn't it? Just wondering...
Proverbs 2:21 LXX (and Clement's use of this and other yesharim passages) |
12-21-2011, 03:00 PM | #7 | |||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bli Bli
Posts: 3,135
|
Quote:
I've seen this point discussed many times here, but never seen this. Nice research aa. |
|||
12-21-2011, 09:06 PM | #8 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
|
Quote:
There are pagan sources, and these include Plato Supreme Theological Divinity, although technically an inexpressible essence and thus nameless, was associated with some names, amongst which the name "The Good" was specifically mentioned. Quote:
You are making a serious mistake stephan huller exactly like Roger Pearse who claims that my research into ancient history is prompted by my malice against Christianity. Whereas in fact I earnestly seek the ancient historical truth of christian origins, and I have followed the evidence. I see this either as some form of inflamatory remark, or as an entirely inaccurate judgement of my position. |
||
12-21-2011, 09:16 PM | #9 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
|
historyhuntersinternational on "Chrest"
The following articles from historyhuntersinternational:
Chrestians and the lost history of Classical Antiquity Chrest Magus Acts of the Chresmologoi: the Role of Oracles and Chronicles in the Creation of Divine Men Quote:
|
|
12-21-2011, 09:45 PM | #10 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
You should be flattered by my assumption that your research is guided by malice. The alternative is personal derangement.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|