Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
11-17-2004, 12:52 AM | #31 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 3,189
|
Quote:
Why does that sound more like an ad hoc explanation to me? Why do I feel that this god is not worthy of worship? Quote:
Since NT was written society has evolved and the church has changed with it - even if screaming and kicking. We got concepts like tolerance, the idea that discrimination is bad etc. The church was originally against many such ideas but they have followed suit and today they talk about these things as "christian values". Yet, again it was MAN's idea - not their fantasy god's idea. The geneva convention, the human rights etc etc etc - all the good moral values we have attained in modern times has been man's achievement. God has played no part. Also, looking back, Jesus sayings was just plain wisdom of the day of his time, he said nothing new - again his sayings was man's sayings - not from God - unless God happen to always stay in tune with man, which appear quite useless if you ask me. Also, going back to Moses' time, the ten commandments and the whole "law" contained the general wisdom of the day, their neighbouring tribes followed more or less the same rules. If you assert the ten commandments etc was divine origin you somehow have to assert that while all the peoples in that region exchanged moral ideas and values they somehow left the jews out and never told them anything until Yahweh told the jews exactly what their neighbours had known for a long time already. I see no reason to credit a fantasy invisible sky daddy with somethi9ng which is so obviously of human origin. Alf |
||
11-17-2004, 02:14 AM | #32 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The Material World
Posts: 834
|
Quote:
An omnipotent being should be able to accomplish any goal with a thought rather than "have to" initiate a gruesome human sacrifice. Or It could have set the price to be a really good basket of blueberry muffins rather than a bloody corpse. Yeshua could have been the chef who baked for our sins. That would have been a much better arrangement for all concerned. Of course, from the very beginning (Cain and Abel) the OT makes it clear that Yahve really gets off on the smell of blood ("Yummm. It is a sweet savour unto Yahve.") but doesn't care much for baked goods. What a perv. At least I can understand Zeus' attraction to women. And if Yeshau did pay the price to eliminate original sin, how come the punishments (working the soil, pain in childbirth, etc.) are still in effect? I think we should demand a refund on this purchase. Hey Yeshua, do you still have the receipt? |
|
11-17-2004, 06:30 AM | #33 | |||
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|