FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-22-2006, 02:46 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Relocating
Posts: 1,184
Default Bible History and the Mideast

I've read the Bible, really I have, years and years ago. And I remember chapters about Palestinians and Hebrews, and tribes moving and being forced to move, but I don't remember who did what to whom.

Can anyone recap the early books of the Bible and say who did what and what went on that might relate to the Middle East problems that exist today?

I don't care if you point fingers or make excuses at/for some or any group; I just wonder if there is history that can explain today's affairs.

I know Islam didn't exist back then, but maybe there was an Arab/Hebrew thing going on? Anyone able to give an "executive summary"?
bogie_blogger is offline  
Old 07-22-2006, 04:26 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the dark places of the world
Posts: 8,093
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bogie_blogger
I've read the Bible, really I have, years and years ago. And I remember chapters about Palestinians and Hebrews, and tribes moving and being forced to move, but I don't remember who did what to whom.

Can anyone recap the early books of the Bible and say who did what and what went on that might relate to the Middle East problems that exist today?

I don't care if you point fingers or make excuses at/for some or any group; I just wonder if there is history that can explain today's affairs.

I know Islam didn't exist back then, but maybe there was an Arab/Hebrew thing going on? Anyone able to give an "executive summary"?
Oh, sure. That's easy. I'll just summarize 4000 years of history and lay out the interactions to modern events. You want that in DOC format, or in HTML? Just gimme a sec.....

That's a pretty tall order you're asking.

Why don't you try using Google to find some basic websites. Even Wikipedia - as much as I despise it - would probably get you off to a good start.
Sauron is offline  
Old 07-24-2006, 04:26 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Relocating
Posts: 1,184
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sauron
Oh, sure. That's easy. I'll just summarize 4000 years of history and lay out the interactions to modern events. You want that in DOC format, or in HTML? Just gimme a sec.....

That's a pretty tall order you're asking.

Why don't you try using Google to find some basic websites. Even Wikipedia - as much as I despise it - would probably get you off to a good start.
I decided to take your advice and refresh my memory. Pretty much what I thought about the Hebrews, Egyptians and Palestinians; a lot of bad blood between them for 4000 years or so.

I think that the only solutions are unpractical.

It may actually take the end of the world to solve the problem; asteroid, exploding Sun, extreme plague, etc.

Why don't you like Wikipedia?
bogie_blogger is offline  
Old 07-24-2006, 04:55 PM   #4
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bogie_blogger
..
Can anyone recap the early books of the Bible and say who did what and what went on that might relate to the Middle East problems that exist today?

I don't care if you point fingers or make excuses at/for some or any group; I just wonder if there is history that can explain today's affairs.

...
Nothing that happened 2000 years ago has any relation to what is going on today, although some perceptions about what happened may be used as rationalizations.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bogie_blogger
Pretty much what I thought about the Hebrews, Egyptians and Palestinians; a lot of bad blood between them for 4000 years or so.
Not really. Just the normal sibling rivalries and tribal territorial disputes.

Present day Palestinian nationalists identify with the Canaanites that the Israelis presumably conquered, but in fact there was no conquest or exodus
Toto is offline  
Old 07-24-2006, 05:43 PM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Relocating
Posts: 1,184
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto
Nothing that happened 2000 years ago has any relation to what is going on today, although some perceptions about what happened may be used as rationalizations.

Not really. Just the normal sibling rivalries and tribal territorial disputes.

Present day Palestinian nationalists identify with the Canaanites that the Israelis presumably conquered, but in fact there was no conquest or exodus
I guess so, but there seem to be parallels anyway. The radical Islamists have focused their hate on Jews and Christians. Maybe they do that to "justify" their amibtions (world domination seems to be their goal)?
bogie_blogger is offline  
Old 07-24-2006, 10:22 PM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: home
Posts: 3,715
Default

BTW bogie blogger, whom do you consider to be the biblical parallels of Palestinians?
Anat is offline  
Old 07-25-2006, 01:20 AM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the dark places of the world
Posts: 8,093
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bogie_blogger

Why don't you like Wikipedia?
It is not a reference. It's a group blog. Which means that you, me, or any other non-expert can write about it. It has far more writers than it has editors or fact-checkers. Which means that bullshit can pass for a reference, simply because the system is overwhelmed with the volume of content it must review.
Sauron is offline  
Old 07-25-2006, 05:42 AM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Relocating
Posts: 1,184
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anat
BTW bogie blogger, whom do you consider to be the biblical parallels of Palestinians?
Philistines? At least that is what I got from the web.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sauron
It is not a reference. It's a group blog. Which means that you, me, or any other non-expert can write about it. It has far more writers than it has editors or fact-checkers. Which means that bullshit can pass for a reference, simply because the system is overwhelmed with the volume of content it must review.
I guess to a certain extend the same can be said for almost any website. If a fact is important you really have to get confirmation from other sites, and you have to consider the source. Religion and anti-religion oriented sites are particularly suspect IMHO because reason and logic are often the first victim.
bogie_blogger is offline  
Old 07-25-2006, 07:40 AM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: home
Posts: 3,715
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bogie blogger
Philistines? At least that is what I got from the web.
The Romans renamed the country Palestine after the Philistines, but by then the Philistines had ceased to be an identifiable ethnicity. They were Aegean tribes that arrived in the Levant in the 12th century BCE but after 2 centuries became assimilated in the Canaanite population and lost most of their unique cultural characteristics.
See The Rise of Some People or Other for what archaeologists have to say. Appendix B deals with the Philistines.
Anat is offline  
Old 07-27-2006, 01:52 AM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the dark places of the world
Posts: 8,093
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bogie_blogger
I guess to a certain extend the same can be said for almost any website.
1. Not really. Not all websites are equally miserable in that respect.

2. Anyone who depends solely on websites, deserves whatever they get from that effort. Research is defined by the quality and relevance of the source to the topic at hand -- and not whether or not the information is accessible on the web.
Sauron is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:07 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.