FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Science & Skepticism > Evolution/Creation
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-27-2004, 07:45 AM   #31
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: outraged about the stiffling of free speech here
Posts: 10,987
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvenoy
I'm reminded of the dino bones that ICR claims were found in Alaske, so fresh that they were all but bloody, and that they won't tell you where you can go to examine them (I asked and never got an answer. Wonder why).
You should perhaps take a look at the FAQ "Dino-blood and the Young Earth" at talkorigins for more infos.
Sven is offline  
Old 04-27-2004, 08:19 AM   #32
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: outraged about the stiffling of free speech here
Posts: 10,987
Default

Quote:
"Single satellite picture revealed pixelated image that overthrows the overwhelming evidence against a global flood" - News at 11.
Excuse me? How does a global flood follow from a boat found atop a mountain (if it were indeed found)? A high flood, okay, but why global? Sounds like a classical non-sequitur.
Sven is offline  
Old 04-27-2004, 08:35 AM   #33
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Just another hick from the sticks.
Posts: 1,108
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sven
You should perhaps take a look at the FAQ "Dino-blood and the Young Earth" at talkorigins for more infos.
Been there, done that, and got a good chuckle at lying fundie expense.

The actual email I sent to ICR was to the effect that I and my good friend, Jack Horner would be interested in these bones. I got no answer, but that's ok. I've never had the pleasure of meeting Mr. Horner, either. They lie, I lie right back.

I am very interested in what results might come out of this latest boondoggle. Will they return and say, "Ah well, it wasn't there." Or might they come up with some photos of varying quality stating that the Ark is found and the Rapture is all but upon us, and all of the faithful must donate many dollars to (enter organization here), and blather, blather, blather!?

And as for any pics forthcoming, with today's digital cameras, there is no excuse for poor quality. Even I can get excellent photos with little effort. On the other hand, it's not all that hard to (ahem) improve them.

Gonna be fun.

doov
Duvenoy is offline  
Old 04-27-2004, 08:38 AM   #34
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 14,952
Default

More ark bullcrap. My blood pressure is spiking
Plognark is offline  
Old 04-27-2004, 08:42 AM   #35
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 14,952
Default

Quote:
I heard this claim last of Jim Larmore - and he does not seem to be around anymore. So perhaps no one is here to thank him/her


Don't remind me, please.
Well, to late I suppose.
I really need to get off my ass and finish up that volumetric proof I was working on to show that the ark was too damn small for even a marginal number of animals.
Plognark is offline  
Old 04-27-2004, 09:41 AM   #36
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: North Babylon, NY
Posts: 106
Default

The AOL welcome page currently has a poll going about this latest Ark news. The latest results are:

Do you believe Noah's Ark exists?
Yes 77%
No 23%

Do you think the object at Mount Ararat is it?
Yes 64%
No 36%

Total Votes: 43,750
Tufted is offline  
Old 04-27-2004, 09:48 AM   #37
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,855
Default

Is this the same guy that brought back a piece of the ark that carbon dated to the 1700's?

Fools.
King Rat is offline  
Old 04-27-2004, 09:53 AM   #38
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: nm
Posts: 2,826
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Evil One
That satellite photo...


...looks like rocks and snow to me...


Now don't get me wrong. Very nice rocks and snow. But rocks and snow nonetheless.
Quote:
Originally Posted by McGargoyle
Maybe I'm blind, but all I see is some blue arrows pointing at nothing in particular and a brown blob in a red circle.
Yeah. That's what I thought.
maddog is offline  
Old 04-27-2004, 10:13 AM   #39
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: outraged about the stiffling of free speech here
Posts: 10,987
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tufted
The AOL welcome page currently has a poll going about this latest Ark news. The latest results are:
Do you believe Noah's Ark exists?
Yes 77%
No 23%
Do you think the object at Mount Ararat is it?
Yes 64%
No 36%
Total Votes: 43,750
:banghead:
Sven is offline  
Old 04-27-2004, 10:14 AM   #40
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,855
Default heh...

Perhaps the mods could merge this thread with the Existence of Christ thread.
King Rat is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:02 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.