Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
01-14-2005, 04:16 PM | #1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: The deformation age
Posts: 1,809
|
Nazerite?
One of the arguments I hear against Jesus being the Messiah {primarily from Orthodox Jews} is that the Messiah is supposed to be a Nazerite, and Jesus was not.
Can anybody provide more information on this? It seems to be a pretty fascinating subject. Why wouldn't Luke recognize this? Was he simply unfamilliar with a Nazerite, and chose to place Jesus' birth in Nazareth {a purely fictional town}? |
01-14-2005, 04:21 PM | #2 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Could you show where the Messiah was supposed to be a Nazerite?
|
01-14-2005, 04:25 PM | #3 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: The deformation age
Posts: 1,809
|
Quote:
All I know about the matter is that I read an essay on the Internet a few years ago writen by a Rabbi which said that Jesus couldn't possibly be the Messiah, because he was supposed to be a Nazerite; the same Jewish sect as Samson. I was just wondering if anybody else had heard of this argument against the divinity of Christ, and if it was factually relevant. |
|
01-14-2005, 07:56 PM | #4 | |
Talk Freethought Staff
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Heart of the Bible Belt
Posts: 5,807
|
Quote:
There was a difference between taking a Nazerite vow and simply being from the city of Nazereth. HTH -Atheos |
|
01-14-2005, 08:57 PM | #5 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: The deformation age
Posts: 1,809
|
Well, I did confuse Nazareth; it's real, Bethlehem wasn't.
And I'm thinking this is more like an extra-Biblical Judaistic tradition; anybody have an idea? |
01-15-2005, 02:34 AM | #6 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: ""
Posts: 3,863
|
Quote:
Robert Price, Incredible Shrinking Son of Man, p.53 Jdges 13:5 says "He will be a Nazirite". Matthew appears to have got Nazwraois (in the Alex Text) from that. This was later redacted to Nazarene. I know, I have delayed in finalizing my Nazareth paper. |
|
01-15-2005, 10:09 AM | #7 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Rachacha NY
Posts: 4,219
|
I was under the impression that Nazareth didn't exist at the time of Jesus, as the Romans had no record of the place. And they wrote down everything; so I can't see them missing a whole city.
I am of the opinion (like many others) that he was a Nazarene, a member of the cult that supposedly camped out in the wilderness and were in charge of maintaining the secrets hidden under the Temple. Ty |
01-16-2005, 05:24 AM | #8 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
|
Quote:
Is it possible that the actual argument went something like this ? Christians believe according to Matthew 2:23 that the scriptural prophecies require the Messiah to be a Nazerite. Jesus however was clearly not a Nazerite (he drank wine etc) Hence by Christians own arguments Jesus is not the Messiah. I don't myself find it a very solid argument but there are several Jewish websites putting forward this sort of argument ie one based not upon Jewish Messianic beliefs but upon alleged contradictions and inconsistencies within Christian beliefs about the Messianic status of Jesus. Andrew Criddle |
|
01-16-2005, 05:28 AM | #9 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: The deformation age
Posts: 1,809
|
Hmm... that could be it; in fact, I think it is.
By the by, why do you not find it solid? |
01-16-2005, 06:49 AM | #10 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
|
Quote:
Andrew Criddle |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|