FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-07-2006, 09:17 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,787
Default Jesus and the emperor Julian (for Pete Brown).

Hi, Pete.

On another thread I mentioned that I agreed with your Eusebian fiction postulate about 0%, and you responded with a request for open dialogue.

As I do not wish to address each and every one of my objections to your view (to do so would take decades ), let me just take issue with what appears to be the root of your theory, that introductory statement by the emperor Julian in Against the Galileans:
It is, I think, expedient to set forth to all mankind the reasons by which I was convinced that the fabrication of the Galilaeans is a fiction of men composed by wickedness.
You appear to read this as his way of saying that the entire history of the Galileans (that is, the Christians) was fabricated, and you go on to hypothesize that it was Eusebius, at the behest of Constantine, who arranged this massive fabrication, that indeed there was no such thing as a Christian until Constantine created the sect.

But is that even close to what Julian meant? Did not Julian himself later write (at least according to W. C. Wright; I have not investigated Cyril of Alexandria for myself) the following?
Yet Jesus, who won over the least worthy of you, has been known by name for but little more than three hundred years: and during his lifetime he accomplished nothing worth hearing of, unless anyone thinks that to heal crooked and blind men and to exorcise those who were possessed by evil demons in the villages of Bethsaida and Bethany can be classed as a mighty achievement.
Since Julian was writing in the middle of century IV, a little more than 300 years would bring us back to early century I. Is Julian not agreeing, then, that Jesus was a real human being, not a fiction, who lived in century I?

He also references the apostle Paul several times, as if Paul, far from being a fiction created by Eusebius, were a real person writing after Jesus but in the earliest days of Christianity.

It appears to me that Julian knew Christianity had been around for at least three centuries. How does it appear to you?

Ben.
Ben C Smith is offline  
Old 06-08-2006, 06:40 PM   #2
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben C Smith
Hi, Pete.

On another thread I mentioned that I agreed with your Eusebian fiction postulate about 0%, and you responded with a request for open dialogue.

As I do not wish to address each and every one of my objections to your view (to do so would take decades ), let me just take issue with what appears to be the root of your theory, that introductory statement by the emperor Julian in Against the Galileans:
It is, I think, expedient to set forth to all mankind the reasons by which I was convinced that the fabrication of the Galilaeans is a fiction of men composed by wickedness.
You appear to read this as his way of saying that the entire history of the Galileans (that is, the Christians) was fabricated, and you go on to hypothesize that it was Eusebius, at the behest of Constantine, who arranged this massive fabrication, that indeed there was no such thing as a Christian until Constantine created the sect.

But is that even close to what Julian meant? Did not Julian himself later write (at least according to W. C. Wright; I have not investigated Cyril of Alexandria for myself) the following?
Yet Jesus, who won over the least worthy of you, has been known by name for but little more than three hundred years: and during his lifetime he accomplished nothing worth hearing of, unless anyone thinks that to heal crooked and blind men and to exorcise those who were possessed by evil demons in the villages of Bethsaida and Bethany can be classed as a mighty achievement.
Since Julian was writing in the middle of century IV, a little more than 300 years would bring us back to early century I. Is Julian not agreeing, then, that Jesus was a real human being, not a fiction, who lived in century I?

He also references the apostle Paul several times, as if Paul, far from being a fiction created by Eusebius, were a real person writing after Jesus but in the earliest days of Christianity.

It appears to me that Julian knew Christianity had been around for at least three centuries. How does it appear to you?

Ben.

Hi Ben,

Thanks for the dialogue in respect of the 0% agreement.
Certainly, if anything, this shows commitment to discussion.

My response to your line of thinking above is as follows:

Let's examine the opening section of the text:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emperor Julian
It is, I think, expedient to set forth to all mankind
the reasons by which I was convinced that
the fabrication of the Galilaeans
is a fiction of men composed by wickedness. (1)

Though it has in it nothing divine,
by making full use of that part of the soul
which loves fable and is childish and foolish,
it has induced men to believe
that the monstrous tale is truth. (2)

Now since I intend to treat of all their first dogmas, as they call them, I wish to say in the first place that if my readers desire to try to refute me they must proceed as if they were in a court of law and not drag in irrelevant matter, or, as the saying is, bring counter-charges until they have defended their own views. (3)

For thus it will be better and clearer if, when they wish to censure any views of mine, they undertake that as a separate task, but when they are defending themselves against my censure, they bring no counter-charges. (4)

It is worth while to recall in a few words whence
and how we first arrived at a conception of God;
next to compare what is said about the divine among the Hellenes and Hebrews; and
finally to enquire of those who are neither Hellenes nor Jews, but belong to the sect of the Galilaeans,
why they preferred the belief of the Jews to ours;
and what, further, can be the reason why they do not even adhere to the Jewish beliefs but have abandoned them also and followed a way of their own. (5)

For they have not accepted a single admirable or important doctrine of those that are held either by us Hellenes or by the Hebrews who derived them from Moses; but from both religions they have gathered what has been engrafted like powers of evil, as it were, on these nations----atheism from the Jewish levity, and a sordid and slovenly way of living from our indolence and vulgarity; and they desire that this should be called the noblest worship of the gods. (6)
I have split each sentence in the opening statements.
Here is a summary:

Sentences 1) and 2) state Julian's case against the Galilaeans.

Sentences 3) and 4) invokes the court of law formalities of getting
a full hearing for Julian's list of "first dogmas", etc and the statement
of case prior to opposition censure, etc

Sentences 5) and 6) commence on a summary outline of how
Julian is going to state his case before he does, what information
he is going to use, and the historical conceptions of god, etc.

Consequently, our argument is that Julian's singular conviction and
reason for writing against the new testament is stated right up the
front of the address in the first 2 sentences. We are then reminded
about civil law, the process of the courts, etc in the next 2 sentences
and finally branch out into a summary of the censure to follow.

The material which you use to demonstrate the possibility that Julian
knew Christianity had been around for at least three centuries is all
contained in the later detailed sections where he is examining the
details of the fiction, fable or monstrous tale.

As with a lawyer or barrister presenting a case is a court of law, if
they are dealing with statements and beliefs of their opponents, they
have to say such things in order to refute them. In the same sense,
I am convinced that Julian's prime reason for writing is stated at the
header of his address, and all else is details and presentation of the
formality of the censure.


To conclude, as I mentioned before, we only have a refutation of Cyril
on one of Julians three books, so we dont have everything that Julian
said, and further we know that Cyril of Alexander purposefully suppressed
material from his calumny of Julian that would corrupt the minds of
christians
.

Therefore to summarise my position, although it may appear to you that
Julian knew Christianity had been around for at least three centuries, it
is not at all absolutely clear to me that he did, seeing as though he
presents a strong case of fiction against christianity in his opening
sentences.

The evidence presented that Julian believes in christianity is derived
from the detailed examination by Julian of the lore of this fiction, which
he has to say in words (as a barrister in court of law to the jury) in
his treatise in order to present the beliefs of the opponent. The barrister
does not have to believe the substance of these. Similarly, Julian in the
later stages of this treatise mentions Jesus, and 300 years, but he does
not have to believe the substance of this.

Best wishes,


Pete Brown
mountainman is offline  
Old 06-09-2006, 10:17 AM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
Default

This pasage from Julian
Quote:
But these are rather your own doings; for nowhere did either Jesus or Paul hand down to you such commands. The reason for this is that they never even hoped that you would one day attain to such power as you have; for they were content if they could delude maidservants and slaves, and through them the women, and men like Cornelius and Sergius.
Seems to mean that Julian regarded the Christian writings as originally composed for a minor sect and only much later coopted for the Constantinian state church.

Andrew Criddle
andrewcriddle is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:42 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.