FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-12-2012, 10:22 AM   #21
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

sotto voce - get a grip. There is something about this topic that has affected you. Is this a key to your theology?
Toto is offline  
Old 09-12-2012, 10:24 AM   #22
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

No, I am wrong. Jerome addresses 'pope Chromatius' in one letter apparently a bishop of Aquileia
stephan huller is offline  
Old 09-12-2012, 10:25 AM   #23
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

Quote:
There is something about this topic that has affected you
This topic? Any reference to things Catholic brings out the beast in this guy.
stephan huller is offline  
Old 09-12-2012, 10:26 AM   #24
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post
In this letter the bishop of Jerusalem is simply called 'bishop' but Epiphanius is 'Pope':

Quote:
About two years ago the aforesaid Pope Epiphanius sent a letter to Bishop John, http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/3001057.htm
Surely the see of Jerusalem is more apostolic than Salamis.
What see of Jerusalem?
sotto voce is offline  
Old 09-12-2012, 10:47 AM   #25
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patriarch_of_Jerusalem
stephan huller is offline  
Old 09-12-2012, 11:29 AM   #26
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post
Is this a place of scholarship, or one for silly or tasteless jokes?

Anglicans admit that the word 'see' has no theological validity, is entirely man-made, and is used by them for practical purposes only. Moreover, they obviously make no greater importance of their Jerusalem see than that of any in England, Africa or elsewhere. Of course, those we know as real Christians do not have 'sees'.

So the question remains. One will search Acts in vain for the word 'see', or any word or construction that could conceivably be used to justify it, in Jerusalem, Rome or anywhere else. As we should know here, the word is justified only from civil administration of the Roman Empire; from invasion of 'the unwashed', of totalitarian politics, light years from the intention of the whole Bible, from start to finish. There can be no 'popes', because there is nowhere for a pope to be. (Even if such an obvious invention as a pope was to try to work his way into a church. Whosoever promotes himself, thereby excludes himself, in considerable embarrassment.)
sotto voce is offline  
Old 09-13-2012, 12:44 AM   #27
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bordeaux France
Posts: 2,796
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
There can be no 'popes', because there is nowhere for a pope to be.
"pope" means "father". It is NOT a hierarchical title, as it is for the bishop of Rome. In the greek christian church, and also in the Russian orthodox church, it is only a sign of politeness.

The russian name "Popov" signifies that the person has an ancestor who was married before being ordained a priest. A married man cannot be a bishop.
Huon is offline  
Old 09-13-2012, 12:47 AM   #28
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

Actually I think pappas means grandfather.
stephan huller is offline  
Old 09-13-2012, 12:59 AM   #29
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bordeaux France
Posts: 2,796
Default

pappas : daddy
pappos : grandfather
Huon is offline  
Old 09-13-2012, 02:21 AM   #30
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Huon View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
There can be no 'popes', because there is nowhere for a pope to be.
"pope" means "father".
True.

What happens when a person becomes a Christian, that gives him or her a father?

What is so dangerous about Christians who have no earthly father? Or are such people not Christians?
sotto voce is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:07 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.