FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-18-2008, 04:13 PM   #1
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Midwest
Posts: 130
Default Evidence of Bible Characters?

So how many graves,bones,shrines have been discovered of the bible characters,especially those like david,daniel,abraham,noah,moses,goliath,mary,josep h,jon the baptist etc.Just curious.
Archer is offline  
Old 02-18-2008, 04:21 PM   #2
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: North West usa
Posts: 10,245
Default

It's real easy: Zilch, nada, none. There are a few items/archeological sites that suggest there was a King David, but that's about the oldest. Note: none of the few items offer enough information to demostrate any scale of the Kings power/wealth.
funinspace is offline  
Old 02-18-2008, 04:31 PM   #3
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Midwest
Posts: 130
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by funinspace View Post
It's real easy: Zilch, nada, none. There are a few items/archeological sites that suggest there was a King David, but that's about the oldest. Note: none of the few items offer enough information to demostrate any scale of the Kings power/wealth.
Are you serious? God zapped these out of existence too? Damn.
Archer is offline  
Old 02-18-2008, 04:43 PM   #4
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: North West usa
Posts: 10,245
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Archer View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by funinspace View Post
It's real easy: Zilch, nada, none. There are a few items/archeological sites that suggest there was a King David, but that's about the oldest. Note: none of the few items offer enough information to demostrate any scale of the Kings power/wealth.
Are you serious? God zapped these out of existence too? Damn.
Quite.

David: If he was as powerful as the Bible claims, then there sure is allot of archeological information that has fallen away, which isn’t very likely, but still possible.
Daniel: He wasn’t a king, so he could disappear in history, especially since Israel was pretty unstable then.
Abraham: He was only written about ages later by the purported Moses, and was effectively a nobody, but for his God.
Noah: This whole thing with the Deluge and such is invisible, so it’s no surprise there is nothing of the purported man.
Moses: The whole Exodus is virtually invisible, never mind the purported leader of it. Christians can’t even agree on when to date the Exodus, or under what Egyptian King they left under. It fits no Egyptian history either. They have to tie vague shards of information to weave a possible tale…
Goliath: I can’t remember his ending at the moment, but in reality a minor purported person, who again could easily disappear in history.
Mary, Joseph, John the Baptist: It is not unreasonable that these people would disappear in the dust bin of history.
funinspace is offline  
Old 02-18-2008, 04:56 PM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Asia
Posts: 3,558
Default

And none of the writings found in the surrounding countries, mention any great kingdom of Israel. So figure.
Thor Q. Mada is offline  
Old 02-18-2008, 06:57 PM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Where I go
Posts: 2,168
Default

Wait a minute. What about Adam?

The whole doctrine of Original Sin rests on Adam and Eve.

That's the "problem statement" of the whole thing.

Habermas and the like love to talk about the evidence for the resurrection. What about The Fall? Otherwise, we have a solution looking for a problem.
OneInFundieville is offline  
Old 02-18-2008, 07:00 PM   #7
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 481
Default

Why is it only Christianity that talks about these two First Humans from which EVERYONE else is descended?

Why aren't they mentioned in EVERY faith system in the World?
Acetylhexene is offline  
Old 02-18-2008, 07:09 PM   #8
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Midwest
Posts: 130
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Negachrist View Post
Why is it only Christianity that talks about these two First Humans from which EVERYONE else is descended?

Why aren't they mentioned in EVERY faith system in the World?
Thats a good point! Hey didn't we find Eve,her real name was Lucy.
Archer is offline  
Old 02-18-2008, 07:49 PM   #9
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 481
Default

Do you mean Lucy (Australopithecus)?
Quote:
...Lucy was only 1.1 m (3 feet 8 inches) tall, weighed 29 kilograms (65 lb) and looked somewhat like a Common Chimpanzee, but although the creature had a small brain, the pelvis and leg bones were almost identical in function with those of modern humans, showing with certainty that these hominids had walked erect.[10]

Johanson and his colleague Tim White, a Californian born paleoanthropologist, placed Australopithecus afarensis as the last ancestor common to humans and chimpanzees living from 3.9 to 3 million years ago...
Acetylhexene is offline  
Old 02-18-2008, 08:05 PM   #10
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,567
Exclamation Mod note.

I am going to give this one some air time in BC&H (with a permanent redirect.) If the discussion drifts into GRD territory, please send it back.
Jehanne is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:30 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.