FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-16-2003, 07:12 PM   #101
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,562
Default

Quote:
BGiC
Yes, I'm familiar with a version of that banal explanation. However, there are many considerations that I'd rather not replicate so here is an abstract of the issue that links to more exhaustive study at the bottom, for the ambitious.
Here we go again. I looked at your reference. Nothing new under the sun!

Bottom line -

GMt 1:17 is contradicted by the list of names which appears in I Chron 3 10:16 no matter what is stated in GMt 1-2:16

To fix this you need to show that there were 14 generation between David and the deportation.

Perhaps you have some other reference to give us.
NOGO is offline  
Old 10-21-2003, 01:07 AM   #102
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 9,159
Default Question on the 14-14-14

I realize this is a flood thread (which I have proven elsewhere to have occurred, worldwide, exactly when, and how) but I was intrigued by this NOGO observation and related retorts:

_____________
Based on that pattern the reader is to be convinced that (a) God has planned all of this and (b) Jesus is the messiah.

The pattern in question is the 14-14-14 years between significant events in the history of Israel.
______________

OK, the messiah thing rests on Isaiah 11:1 for example (and although it is defeated by the virgin birth it is a relatively strong play).

But the 14-14-14 assertion intrigues me because NOGO argues that (essentially) we should be awed by the coincidence of numbers, and perhaps additionally that it is a multiple of seven - the number of days in the week. GAWD!! can it be so banal?!

I'd hope for more than that, like some ancient Sumarian "triple-14 before the dude lays waste to the bad guys" tradition.

How could you, Matthew?
rlogan is offline  
Old 10-21-2003, 02:21 PM   #103
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Don't you wish your boy friend got drunk like me,
Posts: 7,808
Default Re: Question on the 14-14-14

Quote:
Originally posted by rlogan
I realize this is a flood thread (which I have proven elsewhere to have occurred, worldwide, exactly when, and how)
WOW!!!, that's an impressive assertion!

Prove it!
Spenser is offline  
Old 10-21-2003, 02:31 PM   #104
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 9,159
Default Re: Re: Question on the 14-14-14

Quote:
Originally posted by Spenser
WOW!!!, that's an impressive assertion!

Prove it!
Happy to do so my friend. Anyone can work it out for themselves once given a start. First, take any circle of your choice. Calculate this ratio:

(circumference/diameter)

Right after the last decimal place, God put all of the proof there for us to see.

Q.E.D.
rlogan is offline  
Old 10-21-2003, 02:37 PM   #105
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: St. Paul, MN
Posts: 814
Default Re: Re: Re: Question on the 14-14-14

Quote:
Originally posted by rlogan
Happy to do so my friend. Anyone can work it out for themselves once given a start. First, take any circle of your choice. Calculate this ratio:

(circumference/diameter)

Right after the last decimal place, God put all of the proof there for us to see.

Q.E.D.
This just in: pi is proof of a worldwide flood! My math classes obviously never teach me anything useful, this is far more intriguing than Abelian groups.

Seriously, this is almost too funny to have been posted with a straight face. Care to spell out how the two are related, or are you being facetious? I'm really not sure.
Mullibok is offline  
Old 10-21-2003, 02:38 PM   #106
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Question on the 14-14-14

Quote:
Originally posted by Mullibok
Seriously, this is almost too funny to have been posted with a straight face. Care to spell out how the two are related, or are you being facetious? I'm really not sure.
I'll refer you to this thread for the answer.
Mageth is offline  
Old 10-21-2003, 02:42 PM   #107
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: St. Paul, MN
Posts: 814
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Mageth
I'll refer you to this thread for the answer.
Ah, thank you. Facetious it is!
Mullibok is offline  
Old 10-21-2003, 02:54 PM   #108
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 9,159
Default Alternate proof with abelian groups.

Mulibok, you've failed to attend to the first elementary proof. But since you mentioned Abelian groups, we'll work with something you are familiar with. I have worked out a proof for you using abelian groups:

Take the first elementary formula for giving the number of nonisomorphic finite groups of a given group order.

Simply read from left to right. God put it there too.

Q.E.D.
rlogan is offline  
Old 10-21-2003, 03:07 PM   #109
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,562
Default

Quote:
rlogan
But the 14-14-14 assertion intrigues me because NOGO argues that (essentially) we should be awed by the coincidence of numbers, and perhaps additionally that it is a multiple of seven - the number of days in the week. GAWD!! can it be so banal?!

I'd hope for more than that, like some ancient Sumarian "triple-14 before the dude lays waste to the bad guys" tradition.

How could you, Matthew?
You got it all wrong.
My claim is that the author of Matthew thought that you should be awed at the coincidence if numbers. However anyone reading the OT will realize that the coincidence is fabricated.

"Number of days in the week"
In the context of this discussion I would call it the number of days which God took to create the world. Get it? This God does things in multiples of seven - the magic number seven.

Is it a coincidence that the author of GMt deleted just enough names from the list in Chronicles to arrive at 14 ?

"Can it be so banal?"
When you look at what passes for prophecy of the coming of Jesus found in GMt I would say, YES!

If there were 14 generations between Abraham to David and 14 generations from David to the deportation then it follows that 14 generation after the deportation some important event was to take place. Matthew is arguing that the important event was the coming of Jesus which marked the LAST generation, the final call before the end of the world.
NOGO is offline  
Old 10-21-2003, 03:28 PM   #110
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: St. Paul, MN
Posts: 814
Default Re: Alternate proof with abelian groups.

Quote:
Originally posted by rlogan
Mulibok, you've failed to attend to the first elementary proof. But since you mentioned Abelian groups, we'll work with something you are familiar with. I have worked out a proof for you using abelian groups:

Take the first elementary formula for giving the number of nonisomorphic finite groups of a given group order.

Simply read from left to right. God put it there too.

Q.E.D.
Interesting. Your ideas are intriguing to me, and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
Mullibok is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:31 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.