FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-28-2008, 05:36 AM   #41
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Roaming a wilderness that some think is real ...
Posts: 1,125
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by spamandham View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by ohmi View Post

Scripture appears to differ on that :-

2 Timothy 2:19 Nevertheless the foundation of God standeth sure, having this seal, The Lord knoweth them that are his. And, Let every one that nameth the name of Christ depart from iniquity.
Keep in mind that on this forum, "scripture" is simply a collection of ancient texts with no more authority than any other.
Since those calling themselves 'christians' almost all believe in the scripture, it seems relevant to show that the scripture shows unequivocably that they are not Christians unless they give up all sin during their life [before Jesus returns, or before death, whichever is sooner]

The scripture has more 'authority' than other documents simply because it was written by saints and prophets of God .

It has been well-mauled by vested interests in translation and private interpretations by man-made religions , but its redundant structure and symbolic structuring made it resilient ... its authenticity is evidenced by its demolition of paganised modern so-called-'christianity' of sinners [completely different from the Christianity of the scriptures ...and that apostasy prophesied there as inevitable, as further evidence]
ohmi is offline  
Old 06-28-2008, 09:27 AM   #42
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11,525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ohmi View Post

The scripture has more 'authority' than other documents simply because it was written by saints and prophets of God .
Again, on this board, that sort of claim is dismissed out of hand. This is a board filled with atheists. Your arguments can not start by assuming anything miraculous. No one's going to take you seriously if you keep it up.
spamandham is offline  
Old 06-28-2008, 09:46 AM   #43
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bordeaux France
Posts: 2,796
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ohmi View Post
Let every one that nameth the name of Christ depart from iniquity.
Mr A : Are you a Christian ?
Mr B : Oh, yes ! How do you dare ask ?
Mr A : So, you depart from iniquity ?
Mr B : Oh, yes ! How do you dare ask ?
Mr A : So, you never told a lie, even just now ? :devil1:
Huon is offline  
Old 06-28-2008, 09:48 AM   #44
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug Shaver View Post
The ones who say they're the only true Christians are all wrong. The ones who say they are Christians are all right.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Pearse View Post
You will, of course, produce evidence for your claims...? :devil1:
Not until someone tells me who is authorized to decide who the real Christians are, and credibly explains how he or she got that authority.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Pearse View Post
No doubt you believe that every man who says he is honest is telling the truth
There is no analogy there. People are practically unanimous about what it means to be honest, regardless of whether the word rightly applies to them.

I don't mean that it is not possible to falsely claim to be a Christian, but it has to be a deliberate falsehood. That is to say, if someone calls himself a Christian but does not actually consider himself one, then he not really a Christian. But that is not normally what people have in mind when they accuse some group other people of being not real Christians.
Doug Shaver is offline  
Old 06-28-2008, 09:51 AM   #45
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ohmi View Post
Scripture appears to differ on that :-
Your interpretation of scripture may differ. In any case, the opinions of the men who wrote the scriptures carry no more weight with me than your opinions carry.
Doug Shaver is offline  
Old 06-28-2008, 11:51 AM   #46
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Roaming a wilderness that some think is real ...
Posts: 1,125
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug Shaver View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by ohmi View Post
Scripture appears to differ on that :-
Your interpretation of scripture may differ. In any case, the opinions of the men who wrote the scriptures carry no more weight with me than your opinions carry.
There seems no point in their carrying less 'weight' either, particularly when one actually considers what they said [as distinct from what religionists say that they said]
ohmi is offline  
Old 06-29-2008, 08:58 AM   #47
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug Shaver View Post
In any case, the opinions of the men who wrote the scriptures carry no more weight with me than your opinions carry.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ohmi View Post
There seems no point in their carrying less 'weight' either
They scarcely could.
Doug Shaver is offline  
Old 06-29-2008, 09:27 AM   #48
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Roaming a wilderness that some think is real ...
Posts: 1,125
Default

What is not well understood is that they were never meant to, the real power is not force of arms or of money, but the truth about Love [equality, sharing, justice,... ] :-

Matthew 5:5 Blessed are the meek: for they shall inherit the earth.
ohmi is offline  
Old 06-29-2008, 11:15 AM   #49
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: mind the time rift, cardiff, wales
Posts: 645
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ohmi View Post
What is not well understood is that they were never meant to, the real power is not force of arms or of money, but the truth about Love [equality, sharing, justice,... ] :-

Matthew 5:5 Blessed are the meek: for they shall inherit the earth.
I can not get my head around that quote.

was the new Jerusalem that would come after the End be on Earth or in Heaven?

Are the Catholics right in the beleif that they are the 'meek' and new Jerusalem in Rome?

are the meek the 'poor' a.k.a ebonites or 144,000 virgin Jewish men who have not sinned by even the way of a sly wank?

What did Jesus say?
jules? is offline  
Old 06-29-2008, 12:22 PM   #50
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Roaming a wilderness that some think is real ...
Posts: 1,125
Default

[quote=jules?;5420313]
Quote:
Originally Posted by ohmi View Post
What is not well understood is that they were never meant to, the real power is not force of arms or of money, but the truth about Love [equality, sharing, justice,... ] :-

Matthew 5:5 Blessed are the meek: for they shall inherit the earth.
Quote:
was the new Jerusalem that would come after the End be on Earth or in Heaven?
As Jesus and the saints showed, people do not go to heaven at death nor in the resurrection , the firstfruit 144,000 rule upon the earth , the kingdom is come from heaven upon the new earth , not gone to heaven :-

Revelation 21:2 And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.
3 And I heard a great voice out of heaven saying, Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men, and he will dwell with them, and they shall be his people, and God himself shall be with them, and be their God.

Luke 24:39 Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have.

Acts 2:31 He seeing this before spake of the resurrection of Christ, that his soul was not left in hell, neither his flesh did see corruption.

Revelation 5:10 And hast made us unto our God kings and priests: and we shall reign on the earth.

Quote:
Are the Catholics right in the belief that they are the 'meek' and new Jerusalem in Rome?
Rome did not come down out off heaven , nor is it mentioned in scripture that anything but Jerusalem is the holy city of God .

But the many differences [defined by scripture] between Hebrew Christianity of the saints and the Roman paganised apostate religion of sinners show Rome a prime source of the dogma of the antichrist [ the Latin 'Vicarius Filii Dei' actually means 'one in place of Christ', same as the Greek 'antichristos']

Quote:
are the meek the 'poor' a.k.a ebonites or 144,000 virgin Jewish men who have not sinned by even the way of a sly wank?
What did Jesus say?
The 144,000 of Rev 7:3-8 are clearly sealed to become the royal priesthood [1Pet 2:9, Exod 19:6] who inherit rule in the new earth and minister to uncountably many who come by the broad way to Jesus later [Rev 7:9-10].

But the House of Israel were never Jewish , never accepted Judaism and were never accepted by the jews [House of Judah] because of their idol worship [which continues until reached by apostles of THEIR new covenant with God -Heb 8:8-12, Jer 31:31-34]

Thus most of the saints are not Jews ,but are of the House of Israel scattered amongst the gentiles and worshiping idols - until the good news of the Israelite Messiah [king come to unite the two Houses] reaches them.

Deuteronomy 28:64 And the LORD shall scatter thee among all people, from the one end of the earth even unto the other; and there thou shalt serve other gods, which neither thou nor thy fathers have known, even wood and stone.

Matthew 15:24 But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the House of Israel.

Ezekiel 37:22 And I will make them one nation in the land upon the mountains of Israel; and one king shall be king to them all: and they shall be no more two nations, neither shall they be divided into two kingdoms any more at all:

Sinners today ignore what Jesus said, that he is sent only to the House of Israel , anything else is just incidental ...

It is the saints of the House of Israel who [as apostles, apparently from the gentiles] eventually bring in the few Jewish saints :-

Deuteronomy 32:21 I will move them to jealousy with those which are not a people; I will provoke them to anger with a foolish nation.

Isaiah 7:8 For the head of Syria is Damascus, and the head of Damascus is Rezin; and within threescore and five years shall Ephraim be broken, that it be not a people.

1 Peter 2:10 Which in time past were not a people, but are now the people of God: which had not obtained mercy, but now have obtained mercy.

Heb 8:10 For this is the covenant that I will make with the House of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people:
11 And they shall not teach every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the Lord: for all shall know me, from the least to the greatest.
12 For I will be merciful to their unrighteousness, and their sins and their iniquities will I remember no more.
ohmi is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:40 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.