aa5874

But, once it is understood who Jesus was according to the authors of the NT and the Church, then it is very clear that Julian could not have believed Jesus existed as described.

Jesus was proclaimed by the Church to be born of a virgin, without a human father, through the Holy Ghost of God and existed as a God before he became a man who also was the Creator of the world. Jesus, according to the Church subsequently carried out miracles, was transfigured, resurrected and ascended to heaven.

No such character ever existed based on Julian. The Jesus character put forward by the Church was a monstrous lie and had nothing divine.

Even the Hebrew God did not acknowledge he had such a Son, according to Julian, the Jesus of the Church was a counterfeit.

Against the Galileans
Now all those associated with Jesus of the Church must also be fiction fabricated through wickedness, the character Paul being one of them.

Paul claimed to be in contact with the counterfeit son of God and that this fabricated fiction revealed to him the gospel of uncircumcision and certain events while the very counterfeit Son of God lived on earth.

According to Paul, the counterfeit son of God revealed that he was betrayed in the night after he had supped, and that the same counterfeit was crucified, resurrected and ascended to heaven during the time of Tiberius.

Paul wrote about fictitious events.

The Church even put forward a writer who claimed the counterfeit son of God spoke to Saul/Paul from heaven and blinded him to reality.

Paul appears to be fabricated by the fiction of men through wickedness and was a monstrous fable.

No characters called Paul or Jesus, as presented by the Church, ever existed. Paul and Jesus were counterfeit 1st century characters.

Against the Galileans