FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-14-2004, 07:58 AM   #1
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Dallas, Texas, USA
Posts: 1,734
Default Jesus in the Mishna

Wikopeida

http://www.webster-dictionary.org/definition/Yeshu


Quote:
The name Yeshu, which is often rendered in English as Jesus, is similar to Yeshua, which is often believed to be the Aramaic or Hebrew name of the more famous Jesus. Yeshu was a common name, but the Yeshu in question was also referred to as Yeshu ha Notzri (Yeshu the Nazarene). Like Jesus (according to John), Yeshu was executed on the eve of Passover. Yeshu is viewed by the Mishna as having led Jews into apostacy. If the identity of various Mishnaic characters is accepted (see above), other similarities emerge, such as a mother named Miriam (=Mary) who was involved with a carpenter.
Metacrock is offline  
Old 09-14-2004, 08:09 AM   #2
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Metacrock
Where is Yeshu ha Notzri mentioned in the Mishna? and I mean Mishna not Talmuds which are commentaries on the Mishna.


spin
spin is offline  
Old 09-14-2004, 08:11 AM   #3
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Dallas, Texas, USA
Posts: 1,734
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin
Where is Yeshu ha Notzri mentioned in the Mishna? and I mean Mishna not Talmuds which are commentaries on the Mishna.


spin

Well I don't think you understand this. because you don't have it nailed down. Why don't you find some documentation to prove your point?
Metacrock is offline  
Old 09-14-2004, 08:12 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 5,815
Default

This is the guy who was stoned to death by the Jews and his body hung from a tree, right?

Not crucified by the Romans?

If he WAS a historical inspiration for the Jesus legend, but even the non-supernatural aspects of the legend are such a poor match: then maybe Jesus was a composite of several people (at least one of which was, presumably, crucified), and it becomes problematic to refer to such a composite as "the historical Jesus".
Jack the Bodiless is offline  
Old 09-14-2004, 08:16 AM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
Default

You can find a translation and discussion of the passage here:

Baraitha Bab. Sanhedrin 43a

It is a part of the Babylonian Talmud. It is not a part of the Mishnah. I know this because I have a complete and searchable Mishnah on my hard drive, the one translated by Neusner. Also because, of course, the citation is in reference to the Babylonian Talmud Sanhedrin 43a, never mentioning a tractate of the Mishnah.

The quote from the Mishnah that I made previously can also be found here ("This brief passage is the only presumed reference to Jesus in the Mishna").

Of course Baraitha Bab. Sanhedrin 43a can still be discussed as part of the Talmud. And of course I don't think someone is all wrong-headed because I notice something that isn't quite correct. I think it is best to try to stay in the realm of ideas and not that of personalities.

best,
Peter Kirby
Peter Kirby is online now   Edit/Delete Message
Old 09-14-2004, 08:16 AM   #6
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Metacrock
Well I don't think you understand this. because you don't have it nailed down. Why don't you find some documentation to prove your point?
Oh, I love it: yet another attempt to shift the onus and avoid your own responsibility.

Let me make it clearer for you. You haven't got any information from the Mishna and are merely faking it by using such wonderful sources on the subject as Wikipaedia.

A good Mishna has fairly recently been published by Jacob Neusner (Yale U.P.). I suggest you read it or venerable Danby and stop blowing smoke.


spin

(I note Peter has also mentioned Neusner. Hmm, but an electronic version! How much space does it occupy?)
spin is offline  
Old 09-14-2004, 08:36 AM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin
(I note Peter has also mentioned Neusner. Hmm, but an electronic version! How much space does it occupy?)
I think about three megabytes. It does cost $35 to get it.

Since you know Hebrew, see also:

http://www.mechon-mamre.org/b/h/h0.htm

http://www9.cc.huji.ac.il/snunit/kodesh/mishna/

best,
Peter Kirby
Peter Kirby is online now   Edit/Delete Message
Old 09-14-2004, 08:41 AM   #8
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Kirby
I think about three megabytes. It does cost $35 to get it.
Hmmm. Zippable?

Quote:
Since you know Hebrew, see also:

http://www.mechon-mamre.org/b/h/h0.htm

http://www9.cc.huji.ac.il/snunit/kodesh/mishna/

best,
Peter Kirby
Laziness is one of my few indulgences.


spin
spin is offline  
Old 09-14-2004, 08:44 AM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin
Hmmm. Zippable?
Nope. You have to use the Logos software to read it.

best,
Peter Kirby
Peter Kirby is online now   Edit/Delete Message
Old 09-14-2004, 08:52 AM   #10
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Kirby
Nope. You have to use the Logos software to read it.
Ahh, that just means they've already used a compression algo which necessarily means the text is scrambled. It's then just a matter of seeing which one.


spin
spin is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:53 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.