FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-05-2008, 10:52 PM   #11
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11,525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by judge View Post
It does not seem to be that "A few facts aided the credibility of fiction back then, rather than fiction throwing facts into question as it would today", but rather for the most part they just recorded the facts as one would today and on the odd occaision report that men claimed to see something quite odd.
I don't recall claiming Josephus was fictional with a few facts thrown in, so I really have no idea what point it is you are hoping to make.
spamandham is offline  
Old 04-05-2008, 10:55 PM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bli Bli
Posts: 3,135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roland View Post

And don't they also reveal the sources for their information at various times? "Luke" never does that (in fact, he never even identifies HIMSELF!).
Yes well this is problem if ones wants to consider Luke as an historical work, by academic standards. However the fact that Luke does not identify sources or identify himself is no real argument for it being fiction, in and of itself.
judge is offline  
Old 04-05-2008, 10:57 PM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bli Bli
Posts: 3,135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spamandham View Post

I don't recall claiming Josephus was fictional with a few facts thrown in, so I really have no idea what point it is you are hoping to make.
Ok perhaps I misunderstood.

You did say " In the modern world, we tend to think of history from a scientific perspective, but there's not much evidence the ancients thought the same way It didn't seem to bother them in the least to intermix fact and fiction. A few facts aided the credibility of fiction back then, rather than fiction throwing facts into question as it would today. ".

I was merely arguing that Josephus and others did write history much like we do today, albeit with the occaisional odd event reported.
judge is offline  
Old 04-05-2008, 11:01 PM   #14
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11,525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by judge View Post
I was merely arguing that Josephus and others did write history much like we do today, albeit with the occaisional odd event reported.

... except that in the modern world historians don't throw in the occasional odd absurdities. So I don't see how it can be claimed they were like modern historians.
spamandham is offline  
Old 04-05-2008, 11:22 PM   #15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: California
Posts: 748
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spamandham View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by judge View Post
I was merely arguing that Josephus and others did write history much like we do today, albeit with the occaisional odd event reported.

... except that in the modern world historians don't throw in the occasional odd absurdities. So I don't see how it can be claimed they were like modern historians.
I think what he means is that they wrote in a very dry, pedantic style (first this happened, then this happened, then this happened etc.). That is very different from the gospels, which are written in the form of narratives, with characters interacting with one another, dialogue, rising action, falling action, climaxes, denouments, symbolism etc.
Roland is offline  
Old 04-05-2008, 11:28 PM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bli Bli
Posts: 3,135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spamandham View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by judge View Post
I was merely arguing that Josephus and others did write history much like we do today, albeit with the occaisional odd event reported.

... except that in the modern world historians don't throw in the occasional odd absurdities. So I don't see how it can be claimed they were like modern historians.

Easy. Apart from the odd instance they are similar, and even with the odd difference thrown in that would still seem to be similar.
judge is offline  
Old 04-05-2008, 11:34 PM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bli Bli
Posts: 3,135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roland View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by spamandham View Post


... except that in the modern world historians don't throw in the occasional odd absurdities. So I don't see how it can be claimed they were like modern historians.
I think what he means is that they wrote in a very dry, pedantic style (first this happened, then this happened, then this happened etc.). That is very different from the gospels, which are written in the form of narratives, with characters interacting with one another, dialogue, rising action, falling action, climaxes, denouments, symbolism etc.
Agreed.

Except that the gospel of Luke begins quite deliberately as if it were historical, detailing facts. This is the point and inquiry of the OP, where I wrote.
"Is there a work of fiction , ideally from the ancient world, that addresses the reader in such a manner?"
judge is offline  
Old 04-06-2008, 01:58 AM   #18
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

There is some extensive analysis of prefaces in Hellenistic literature. I gave you one reference above; there is more commentary here and here

From the latter link:
Quote:
Prefaces were highly conventional, and probably taught in school. Their claims could be parodied.

Medical writers, astrologers, dream interpreters, and novelists all used prefaces. They were not the preserve of historians. Novelists could use them to create verisimilitude.
Some examples follow that should answer your question, including a novel and a parodist.
Toto is offline  
Old 04-06-2008, 02:33 AM   #19
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

Ok , no reaction to the New Testament being like Mills and Boon, what about Doctor Who?
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 04-06-2008, 05:21 AM   #20
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bli Bli
Posts: 3,135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post

Some examples follow that should answer your question, including a novel and a parodist.
Ok so I suppose the answer to my question is no then when I ask, "Is there a work of fiction , ideally from the ancient world, that addresses the reader in such a manner?"

Here (unless I'm mistaken) is the intro to the novel.

Not very much like to intro to Lukes gospel.

Thanks for your help Toto. :notworthy:
judge is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:10 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.