Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
10-02-2011, 06:06 PM | #1 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
The Christ Myth [Theory] and its problems by Robert Price
Robert M. Price is now selling copies of "The Christ Myth and Its Problems" for $23. The book was published by American Atheists Press. The book contains articles written by Price and is over 400 pages.
Price provided the contents of this to Bart Ehrman, so Ehrman's upcoming book will presumably try to refudiate this. To order, go to his website and find the obscurely placed Paypal donation button on the left side of the page, below "Mindvendor" and above the book icons. Click on that button and enter the amount; then include your name and shipping address in the transaction notes. Eventually, you will be able to order it on Amazon and Barns and Noble |
10-02-2011, 08:48 PM | #2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
"Barns and Noble" I assume is some farm equipment company where erudite agricultural workers in California frequently buy books.
|
10-03-2011, 09:37 AM | #3 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,579
|
Thanks, Toto.
According to Amazon.ca, the title is slightly different: "The Christ Myth Theory and Its Problems". Best, Jiri |
10-03-2011, 10:52 AM | #4 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Quote:
B&N Google books Amazon.com does not have a listing yet. |
|
10-03-2011, 10:58 AM | #5 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
Quote:
1. Jesus was described as a Child of a Ghost. 2. No apologetic contemporary of the supposed Jesus wrote that they saw him alive. 3. No non -apologetic contemporary claimed they saw Jesus alive. 4. No apologetic sources have been dated to the 1st century BEFORE the Fall of the Temple. 5. Non-apologetic sources did NOT account for a Messiah called Jesus BEFORE the Fall of the Temple. 6. Apologetic sources claimed Jesus TRANSFIGURED during his supposed life on earth. 7. A supposed contemporary claimed he was NOT the apostle of a man but of Jesus who was raised from the dead. 8. A supposed contemporary claimed the Lord Jesus was FROM heaven. 9. A supposed contemporary of Jesus claimed was God's Son. 10. A supposed contemporary claimed Jesus was in the FORM of God and EQUAL to God. Jesus was PURE MYTH. |
|
10-03-2011, 02:44 PM | #6 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Southern United States
Posts: 149
|
Another reach! I won't be ordering it thats for sure.....good posts Double AA!
|
10-10-2011, 12:38 AM | #7 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
My copy has arrived.
In the Introduction, Robert M. Price describes how he originally accepted the liberal Christian view of the historical Jesus as "a prophet heralding the arrival of the eschatological Kingdom of God." This Jesus had predicted the coming of the Son of Man, and angelic figure that would raise the dead and judge mankind. When he cleansed the Temple, the Sadducee establishment in cahoots with the Romans got him crucified, but a few days later, his disciples began experiencing visions of him arisen from the dead, and the disciples concluded that Jesus himself was the Son of Man. But Price eventually rejected this view, and decided that Jesus was myth all the way down, like Hercules. He is not happy with that view, and wishes it were not true, but that is the way the evidence leads him. He was initially struck by the similarity of Jesus' story to the dying and rising gods of the Mediterranean. But these similarities are not enough to prove that Jesus was originally a myth. Bultman admitted that these myths shaped the form of the resurrection belief among early Christians. But beyond this, all of the elements of the Jesus story dissolve under scrutiny. Other factors: all of the sayings attributed to Jesus are so closely paralleled in contemporary Rabbinic or Hellenistic lore that there is no particular reason to see any of them as originating with Jesus. And virtually every story in the gospels and in the book of Acts looks like a Christian rewrite of material from either the Septuagint, Homer, Euripides' Bacchus, or Josephus. Price sees the strongest argument for a historical Jesus as this: that "one can plausibly read certain texts in Acts, Mark and Galatians as fossils preserving the memory of a successionist struggle following the death of Jesus, who must therefore have existed." This implies that Jesus was a latter day Judas Maccabee, who had a group of brothers who could take up the banner when then eldest was killed in battle. Price says that S.G.F. Brandon makes a good case for a Zealot Jesus. But he thinks that the elements that point to a Zealot Jesus are easier to explain as derived from the Jewish War and the fall of Jerusalem. |
10-10-2011, 04:24 AM | #8 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mondcivitan Republic
Posts: 2,550
|
Quote:
DCH |
|
10-10-2011, 06:32 AM | #9 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
|
Quote:
|
||
10-10-2011, 09:52 AM | #10 | |||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mondcivitan Republic
Posts: 2,550
|
Quote:
DCH |
|||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|