FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-05-2008, 10:18 PM   #41
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Killeen, TX
Posts: 1,388
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
The digression into the topic of universal salvation has been split off here.
Wait - how could we get a thread of salvation that does not include Uwe Boll. Surely he is part of the punishment?:Cheeky:

edit - since this is later, this refers to post #37.
badger3k is offline  
Old 05-06-2008, 09:08 AM   #42
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Roaming a wilderness that some think is real ...
Posts: 1,125
Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by badger3k View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by ohmi View Post

I'm unsure what you are getting at, but does this quote not seem to pre-date the Middle Ages ?

1 Chronicles 21:1 And Satan stood up against Israel, and provoked David to number Israel.
The biblical verses merely refer to the title "the satan" and name "Satan". Lucifer, perhaps; I've heard a few different interpretations of that. What I was referring to is all the other names that people today use to refer to the great evil god in christian mythology (mephistopheles, beelezbub, etc). These, unless I am mistaken, came from CE, and came from the time (middle ages? I am not sure here) when demonology got started (I think the new age "magick" types refer to this as hermetic - I think after a big name in the history), but I'm going by a mixture of things I've read over the years. I haven't actually looked into the real history, so I posted this since it may add information as to how the image of Satan et al developed over time.

Not sure if that cleared anything up, or if it just made it muddier.

What's the oldest version of that passage - is it older than the Babylonian Exile, or is it younger, and are we sure that it uses "Satan" as a proper name? Just curious, since I know that translators have tended to change things to fit their own ideas all the time.
As you indicate, the 'name' 'Satan' is not a proper name at all, but just means 'adversary' in Hebrew , so that in Enoch 1 for instance a whole host of 'satans' or 'adversaries of God' are named ,and their leader is 'Samyaza'.
ohmi is offline  
Old 05-06-2008, 09:36 AM   #43
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: ucla, southern california
Posts: 140
Default so getting back to the original question...

have we now determined that 'the satan' was a simple adjective (accuser/adversary) that was appropriated as a proper name? good. from there, that is, from the very late introduction of a satan into the hebrew literature, he evolves. the view of satan evolves, as does the tradition and speculation surrounding him.

but to answer the original question, one should accept 'satan' (common noun) as the original name for satan just as one accepts 'god' (another common noun) as a proper name for god. as the traditions and reflections surrounding both multiplied, so did their names...
XKV8R is offline  
Old 05-06-2008, 10:30 AM   #44
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Roaming a wilderness that some think is real ...
Posts: 1,125
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by badger3k View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by ohmi View Post

I'm unsure what you are getting at, but does this quote not seem to pre-date the Middle Ages ?

1 Chronicles 21:1 And Satan stood up against Israel, and provoked David to number Israel.
The biblical verses merely refer to the title "the satan" and name "Satan". Lucifer, perhaps; I've heard a few different interpretations of that. What I was referring to is all the other names that people today use to refer to the great evil god in christian mythology (mephistopheles, beelezbub, etc). These, unless I am mistaken, came from CE, and came from the time (middle ages? I am not sure here) when demonology got started (I think the new age "magick" types refer to this as hermetic - I think after a big name in the history), but I'm going by a mixture of things I've read over the years. I haven't actually looked into the real history, so I posted this since it may add information as to how the image of Satan et al developed over time.

Not sure if that cleared anything up, or if it just made it muddier.

What's the oldest version of that passage - is it older than the Babylonian Exile, or is it younger, and are we sure that it uses "Satan" as a proper name? Just curious, since I know that translators have tended to change things to fit their own ideas all the time.
The leader of the 'satans' [adversaries of God] is named Samyaza according to Enoch 1 .
ohmi is offline  
Old 05-06-2008, 10:35 AM   #45
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
Default

The "serpent" in the Garden of Eden story is very ancient, and in the Scriptural narrative introduces the first lie, and the first opposition to the words of YHWH. and while not specifically identified at that time by the name "Satan", what he was engaged in, the lying, deceiving, opposing, and being an adversary, was the very definition of the term "the satan".
But that power has never cared much what "name" it has operated under, but only what man, and what man made institutions it can employ to propagate lies, deceptions, and agendas fostering lies leading to human suffering and wars .
In various times his minions have worn black, or white, sometimes red or royal purple, sometimes brown shirts and shiny boots, and sometimes drab green, or tan, and dirty combat boots. "just following orders".
He has sat on the Bench within Halls of Justice, and employed the lips of "public servants" and of Judges to "just follow the laws" to decree, and to enforce unjust decrees.
He has spoken through the mouths of Governors, governments, Pharaohs, Kings, Presidents, and Dictators. A commanding, smooth, reasonable and persuasive figure, often have men set down with him, signed contracts with him, and admired him and his works, yet not perceived to whom they have extended their right hand of friendship and fellowship.
Always a "snake in the grass", camouflaged, seeking whom or what he might entangle within his coils, fascinate with his appearance, and swallow up in his perfidious scheme against both truth and humanity.
This satan, "Satan" is not a "was", but is an IS, as real and as present as the sun, and is always at work within the affairs of all men, and will continue to be until such time as he is defeated and taken out of the way.
Sheshbazzar is offline  
Old 05-06-2008, 09:12 PM   #46
Donn10
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Pleased to meet you hope you guess my name
 
Old 05-07-2008, 08:28 AM   #47
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Killeen, TX
Posts: 1,388
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ohmi View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by badger3k View Post

The biblical verses merely refer to the title "the satan" and name "Satan". Lucifer, perhaps; I've heard a few different interpretations of that. What I was referring to is all the other names that people today use to refer to the great evil god in christian mythology (mephistopheles, beelezbub, etc). These, unless I am mistaken, came from CE, and came from the time (middle ages? I am not sure here) when demonology got started (I think the new age "magick" types refer to this as hermetic - I think after a big name in the history), but I'm going by a mixture of things I've read over the years. I haven't actually looked into the real history, so I posted this since it may add information as to how the image of Satan et al developed over time.

Not sure if that cleared anything up, or if it just made it muddier.

What's the oldest version of that passage - is it older than the Babylonian Exile, or is it younger, and are we sure that it uses "Satan" as a proper name? Just curious, since I know that translators have tended to change things to fit their own ideas all the time.
The leader of the 'satans' [adversaries of God] is named Samyaza according to Enoch 1 .
Interesting. Thanks for the replies.
badger3k is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:54 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.