FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-25-2007, 03:26 PM   #1
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default If the Ten Plagues occured, would it have been the end of Egypt as a world power?

Further, if the Ten Plagues occured, would some historical records other than the Bible probably have survived?
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 08-25-2007, 04:04 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,037
Default

I'd say so. The destruction of an entire year's food crop plus the loss of the logistical infrastructure in the form of the domesticated animals would have seriously weakened Egypt as a power.

And one would think a neighboring nation would have noticed the Egyptians scrambling around to replace the food and animals.
Gullwind is offline  
Old 08-25-2007, 04:32 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,808
Default

One would think that Egypt's other vassals would have taken the opportunity to rebel. That didn't happen either.
Minimalist is offline  
Old 08-25-2007, 04:43 PM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Middlesbrough, England
Posts: 3,909
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic View Post
Further, if the Ten Plagues occured, would some historical records other than the Bible probably have survived?
I don't think you have to bother yourself with pointing out the plain fact that the mythical plagues never occurred, as they won't believe any real hard evidence to the contrary.

But they can't avoid the embarrassment that their very own magic book states quite categorically that Osiris was perfectly capable of miraculously bringing real live snakes into existence when called upon to do so by a trained priest. It rather takes the wind out of the sails of the good ship monotheism. They clearly weren't pushing this line in Moses day, only that their god was mightier than everybody else's, as evidenced by his superior snake making skills.

Boro Nut
Boro Nut is offline  
Old 08-25-2007, 05:55 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: California
Posts: 748
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gullwind View Post
I'd say so. The destruction of an entire year's food crop plus the loss of the logistical infrastructure in the form of the domesticated animals would have seriously weakened Egypt as a power.

And one would think a neighboring nation would have noticed the Egyptians scrambling around to replace the food and animals.
Ah, but you forget that all the "dead" domesticated animals seem to be miraculously resurrected (so they can be killed again) all throughout the story. Maybe the last resurrection actually "took."

:Cheeky:
Roland is offline  
Old 08-25-2007, 06:13 PM   #6
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 147
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boro Nut View Post
But they can't avoid the embarrassment that their very own magic book states quite categorically that Osiris was perfectly capable of miraculously bringing real live snakes into existence when called upon to do so by a trained priest. It rather takes the wind out of the sails of the good ship monotheism. They clearly weren't pushing this line in Moses day, only that their god was mightier than everybody else's, as evidenced by his superior snake making skills.

Boro Nut
Clearly, the plagues were aimed at showing that the LORD was more powerful than the Egyptian gods, as this comment for the tenth plague so identifies:
Ex 12:12
12 For I will pass through the land of Egypt that night, and I will strike down every firstborn in the land of Egypt, both human beings and animals; on all the gods of Egypt I will execute judgments: I am the LORD.
NRSV

I know of no identification of the snake trick with Osiris. There is also a debate as to whether the magicians did this per slight-of-hand or through real magic. In either case, the Christian holds to supernatural being possible and not only from the true God.

Thanks,
Timetospend is offline  
Old 08-25-2007, 06:19 PM   #7
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 147
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roland View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gullwind View Post
I'd say so. The destruction of an entire year's food crop plus the loss of the logistical infrastructure in the form of the domesticated animals would have seriously weakened Egypt as a power.

And one would think a neighboring nation would have noticed the Egyptians scrambling around to replace the food and animals.
Ah, but you forget that all the "dead" domesticated animals seem to be miraculously resurrected (so they can be killed again) all throughout the story. Maybe the last resurrection actually "took."

:Cheeky:
This one actually through me for about 10 years until the obvious dawned on me. "All" does not always mean "all," as in everything. Not to make this a Clintonesque statement, "all" can also mean (and not limited to):
-All kinds of cattle.
-Cattle located in all parts of the country.
-Cattle belonging to all classes of people.

Thanks,
Timetospend is offline  
Old 08-25-2007, 07:10 PM   #8
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default

Message to Timetospend: Let's get something straight: How destructive do you believe the Ten Plagues were to Egypt? In your opinion, would they have been the biggest news story in the world by far at that time?
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 08-25-2007, 07:20 PM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,808
Default

All kinds of cattle.
-Cattle located in all parts of the country.
-Cattle belonging to all classes of people



Once again we are treated to the spectacle of the bible being the fucking inerrant word of god until it doesn't make any sense.

Then it has to be "interpreted" for us.
Minimalist is offline  
Old 08-25-2007, 07:28 PM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,037
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Timetospend View Post
This one actually through me for about 10 years until the obvious dawned on me. "All" does not always mean "all," as in everything. Not to make this a Clintonesque statement, "all" can also mean (and not limited to):
-All kinds of cattle.
-Cattle located in all parts of the country.
-Cattle belonging to all classes of people.

Thanks,
Well, the bible says "all the cattle of Egypt died." Which interpretation do you think is the right one?
Gullwind is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:35 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.