FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-03-2008, 04:11 AM   #101
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 2,366
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhutchin View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by makerowner View Post

The Qur'aan says that it was written directly by God, so I guess it's more valuable than Peter or Paul, who were just inspired by God. Right?
I did not know that. Do you have the exact language from the Koran stating this?
Judging from this, I take it you have never questioned your beliefs or considered the claims of others?
Dogfish is offline  
Old 01-03-2008, 04:39 AM   #102
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 9,059
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by punk77 View Post
No - he is saying that they can never be forgiven: '...whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, neither in the world to come.'
This is where we disagree.

You take '......it shall not be forgiven him,...' to mean it not only shall not be forgiven but cannot be forgiven under no circumstances whatsoever.

I take '......it shall not be forgiven him,...' to mean it shall not be forgiven if nothing changes but that it can be forgiven if those circumstances change.

We might use Saul/Paul as an example. Saul went around persecuting the church. We can say that he "spoke against the Son of man" according to Matthew 12:32. On the road to Damascus, Saul was confronted by the Holy Spirit. Had Saul rejected the Holy Spirit at that point and continued to persecute the church, we could conclude that he had blasphemed the Holy Spirit and would never receive salvation. That would be true. However, I do not see that a rejection by Saul on the road to Damascus would prevent God from providing a second Damascus Road experience if He chose to do so.

The conclusion is that the Holy Spirit witnesses that Christ is God. This was done in the form of miracles before the Pharisees. The Pharisees attributed the miracles to Satan thus blaspheming the witness of the Holy Spirit. Because of that, those Pharisees could not be saved unless something happened to change their situation. Saul, who claimed that according to the strictest sect of the Jewish religion he lived a Pharisee, might well have attributed the miracles of Jesus to Satan. However, his circumstances changed on the road to Damascus. He later claimed that he was forgiven because all that he did was done in ignorance. So it is for all of us.

Similarly, Joan of Bark can reject the testimony of the Scriptures through which the Holy Spirit witnesses that Christ is God and by doing so, she can be said to blaspheme the Holy Spirit. However, that would not prevent her having a Damascus Road experience at some later date that would turn her situation around and she would then look back on her life and marvel at her earlier ignorance. For the present, a person's rejection of the witness of the Holy Spirit by rejecting the Scriptures that tell us that Christ is God means that the person can be certain that such blasphemy shall not be forgiven. So long as the person continues in this blasphemy, they will not enter into heaven.
rhutchin is offline  
Old 01-03-2008, 04:48 AM   #103
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 9,059
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dogfish View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhutchin View Post
I did not know that. Do you have the exact language from the Koran stating this?
Judging from this, I take it you have never questioned your beliefs or considered the claims of others?
The claims of other religions seem to fall into two categories. The first is that there is nothing you can do about your situation so don't try. The other is to be as good as you can and hope for the best. What claims do you think about when you consider the claims of others.

What should I question about my beliefs? Should I question the idea that a person is accountable for what he does and will receive the reward for his sin? If it is true, what good does it do to question it? If it is false, how would I know?
rhutchin is offline  
Old 01-03-2008, 04:54 AM   #104
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 9,059
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dogfish View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhutchin View Post
A few examples (I hit the submit button before I was ready, but you can basically read the introductions to most books to establish the source of the account).

Luke 1
1 Inasmuch as many have taken in hand to set in order a narrative of those things which have been fulfilled among us,
2 just as those who from the beginning were eyewitnesses and ministers of the word delivered them to us,
3 it seemed good to me also, having had perfect understanding of all things from the very first, to write to you an orderly account, most excellent Theophilus,
4 that you may know the certainty of those things in which you were instructed.

Romans 1
1 Paul, a bondservant of Jesus Christ, called to be an apostle, separated to the gospel of God...
7 To all who are in Rome, beloved of God, called to be saints: Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ.

1 Corinthians
1 Paul, called to be an apostle of Jesus Christ through the will of God, and Sosthenes our brother,
2 To the church of God which is at Corinth,...

Philemon
1 Paul, a prisoner of Christ Jesus, and Timothy our brother, To Philemon our beloved friend and fellow laborer,
2 to the beloved Apphia, Archippus our fellow soldier, and to the church in your house:...

Revelation
9 I, John, both your brother and companion in the tribulation and kingdom and patience of Jesus Christ, was on the island that is called Patmos for the word of God and for the testimony of Jesus Christ.
10 I was in the Spirit on the Lord’s Day, and I heard behind me a loud voice, as of a trumpet,...
So, it's an eyewitness account because is SAYS it's an eyewitness account. You'll have to do better than that.
Judge for yourself whether Paul and John were telling the truth. You choose whether to believe because of that which they say and not because of anything I might say about them.
rhutchin is offline  
Old 01-03-2008, 05:00 AM   #105
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 2,366
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhutchin View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dogfish View Post
Judging from this, I take it you have never questioned your beliefs or considered the claims of others?
The claims of other religions seem to fall into two categories. The first is that there is nothing you can do about your situation so don't try. The other is to be as good as you can and hope for the best. What claims do you think about when you consider the claims of others.

What should I question about my beliefs? Should I question the idea that a person is accountable for what he does and will receive the reward for his sin? If it is true, what good does it do to question it? If it is false, how would I know?
How can you say it's "true" if you've never questioned it? Apparantly you don't know a basic tenet of Islam - that Allah wrote the Koran - so I guess you define "true" as what you prefer. And if you were born in the ME, you'd no doubt use the same argument about being Muslim.

I think about what there is proof for, the consistancy of the claims and the actions as they pertain to the teachings - to do any less is to throw common sense and logic out the window and be at the mercy of emotion-diven fears.
And, IMO, be a hypocrite.
Dogfish is offline  
Old 01-03-2008, 05:03 AM   #106
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 2,366
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhutchin View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dogfish View Post

So, it's an eyewitness account because is SAYS it's an eyewitness account. You'll have to do better than that.
Judge for yourself whether Paul and John were telling the truth. You choose whether to believe because of that which they say and not because of anything I might say about them.
Why does "I believe it to be true: you judge for yourself" only seem to apply to christians?
Dogfish is offline  
Old 01-03-2008, 05:05 AM   #107
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 9,059
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by makerowner View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhutchin View Post

I did not know that. Do you have the exact language from the Koran stating this?
Here's a few. There are probably hundreds.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Surah 2:185
The month of Ramadan, in which was revealed the Qur'aan[...]
So I guess you'll be converting to Islam now, right? After all, the book said it was inspired by God, so it must be true.
OK. I got off on a tangent thinking that you were saying that God actually wrote the Koran sota like the angel Moroni providing gold plates to Joseph Smith (or whoever). I get the inspiration part.

So now we have the Bible which God is claimed to have inspired men to write and the Koran which Allah is claimed to have inspired Mohammed to write. I guess we get to choose between the two which one to believe, God or Allah. I will go with God as he has provided a means for my sins to be forgiven. From what the Muslims tell me, Allah has not done this.

Quote:
Originally Posted by makerowner View Post
Also, where exactly in the Bible do you find a listing of canonical books and an explanation that they are all the word of God? And don't use that one about 'all scripture is from God', because there was no defined canon at the time.
Let's limit the canon to those books written be recognized prophets of God, the apostles of Christ who were taught by Christ and those who were closely associated with the apostles of Christ and recorded the apostles' activities.
rhutchin is offline  
Old 01-03-2008, 05:07 AM   #108
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 9,059
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dogfish View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhutchin View Post

Judge for yourself whether Paul and John were telling the truth. You choose whether to believe because of that which they say and not because of anything I might say about them.
Why does "I believe it to be true: you judge for yourself" only seem to apply to christians?
Why would you think it only applies to Christians? It applies to everyone. You have a brain; you can judge; do it.
rhutchin is offline  
Old 01-03-2008, 06:17 AM   #109
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 5,815
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhutchin
OK. I got off on a tangent thinking that you were saying that God actually wrote the Koran sota like the angel Moroni providing gold plates to Joseph Smith (or whoever). I get the inspiration part.

So now we have the Bible which God is claimed to have inspired men to write and the Koran which Allah is claimed to have inspired Mohammed to write. I guess we get to choose between the two which one to believe, God or Allah. I will go with God as he has provided a means for my sins to be forgiven. From what the Muslims tell me, Allah has not done this.
There is a difference: Mohammed was supposedly "taking dictation", The Koran is supposed to be the actual words of Allah transcribed by Mohammed.

So you'd rather take the accounts of human "eyewitnesses" over the actual words of God himself. An odd choice. And, AFAIK, you get to go to Heaven just for being a Muslim, unless you've really screwed up bigtime. What sort of "sins" are we talking about here, rhutchin?
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhutchin
Let's limit the canon to those books written be recognized prophets of God, the apostles of Christ who were taught by Christ and those who were closely associated with the apostles of Christ and recorded the apostles' activities.
...Ah. So your canon includes the Gospel of Thomas, the Gospel of Mary Magdalene, the Gospel of Judas, the Book of Enoch, and so on.
Jack the Bodiless is offline  
Old 01-03-2008, 10:58 AM   #110
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: California
Posts: 748
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhutchin View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roland View Post

According to John, Jesus appeared to ten of his disciples in a locked room on Easter night (Thomas being absent). He convinced the disciples that it was indeed he who stood before them. Thus, this incident has to be the same one referred to by Mark where it is said eleven were together eating and he rebuked them for their unbelief. It can't be Jesus' 2nd appearance to them some time later (as recorded by John) since in that incident Thomas is the only one still doubting and thus the only one receiving Jesus' rebuke for unbelief.

My point is that Mark and Luke clearly state that eleven discples were present at that scene (even though you have Thomas leaving to go to the bathroom or something in Luke's version), while John alone states Thomas was absent (thereby making it ten). I'm not sure how I can make my case any more plainly than that.

Appearance #1 (Easter night):

Mark 16:14 eleven disciples present (Jesus rebukes them for their unbelief)

Luke 24: 36-43 eleven disciples present (verse 33) (Jesus convinces them he is real)

John 20: 19-25 ten disciples present (minus Thomas) (Jesus convinces them he is real)

Appearance #2 (a week after Easter):

John 20: 26-29 Jesus appears again, this time convincing Thomas as well that he is real
Jesus appears to two disciples on the road to Emaus.

- After that, [Jesus] appeared in another form to two of them as they walked and went into the country. (Mark 16:12)

- Now behold, two of them were traveling that same day [when Christ was risen] to a village called Emmaus, which was seven miles from Jerusalem. (Luke 24:13)

The two go back to the “eleven” and tell them what happened.
- So they rose up that very hour and returned to Jerusalem, and found the eleven and those who were with them gathered together,
- saying, “The Lord is risen indeed, and has appeared to Simon!”
- And they told about the things that had happened on the road, and how He was known to them in the breaking of bread. (Luke 24:33-35)

- And they went and told it to the rest, but they did not believe them either [as they did not believe the women earlier]. (Mark 16:13)

Jesus appears to the”ten” as Thomas is not present.
- Then, the same day at evening, being the first day of the week, when the doors were shut where the disciples were assembled, for fear of the Jews, Jesus came and stood in the midst, and said to them, “Peace be with you.” (John 20:19)

- Now as [the two from Emaus] said these things, Jesus Himself stood in the midst of them, and said to them, “Peace to you.”
- But they were terrified and frightened, and supposed they had seen a spirit.
- And He said to them, “Why are you troubled? And why do doubts arise in your hearts? (Luke 24:36-38)

- When He had said this, He showed them His hands and His side. Then the disciples were glad when they saw the Lord. (John 20:20)

- “Behold My hands and My feet, that it is I Myself. Handle Me and see, for a spirit does not have flesh and bones as you see I have.”
- When He had said this, He showed them His hands and His feet. (Luke 24:39-40)

- So Jesus said to them again, “Peace to you! As the Father has sent Me, I also send you.”
- And when He had said this, He breathed on them, and said to them, “Receive the Holy Spirit.
- “If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven them; if you retain the sins of any, they are retained.” (John 20:21-23)

Thomas’ absence noted.
- Now Thomas, called the Twin, one of the twelve, was not with them when Jesus came. (John 20:24)

Jesus eats with the “ten.”
- But while they still did not believe for joy, and marveled, He said to them, “Have you any food here?”
- So they gave Him a piece of a broiled fish and some honeycomb.
- And He took it and ate in their presence. (Luke 24:41-43)

The “ten” tell Thomas what has happened.
- [Later,] The other disciples therefore said to [Thomas], “We have seen the Lord.” So he said to them, “Unless I see in His hands the print of the nails, and put my finger into the print of the nails, and put my hand into His side, I will not believe.” (John 20:25)

Jesus appears to the “eleven" at a later date (eight days?).
- Later He appeared to the eleven as they sat at the table; and He rebuked their unbelief and hardness of heart, because they did not believe those who had seen Him after He had risen. (Mark 16:14)

- And after eight days His disciples were again inside, and Thomas with them. Jesus came, the doors being shut, and stood in the midst, and said, “Peace to you!”
- Then He said to Thomas, “Reach your finger here, and look at My hands; and reach your hand here, and put it into My side. Do not be unbelieving, but believing.”
- And Thomas answered and said to Him, “My Lord and my God!”
- Jesus said to him, “Thomas, because you have seen Me, you have believed. Blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed.”
- And truly Jesus did many other signs in the presence of His disciples, which are not written in this book;
- but these are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that believing you may have life in His name. (John 20:26-31)

Jesus meets the “eleven” at Galilee.
- And [Later in Galilee] He said to them, “Go into all the world and preach the gospel to every creature….(Mark 16:15)

- Then the eleven disciples went away into Galilee, to the mountain which Jesus had appointed for them.
- When they saw Him, they worshiped Him; but some doubted.
- And Jesus came and spoke to them, saying, “All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth.
- “Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations,… (Matthew 28:16-19)

Your claim is, "It can't be Jesus' 2nd appearance to them some time later (as recorded by John) since in that incident Thomas is the only one still doubting and thus the only one receiving Jesus' rebuke for unbelief. "

The issue is what Mark means in v16 when he writes, "Later,..." How much time elapses between v15 and v16. The context in Mark does not tell us. From John we learn that Thomas was absent when Jesus first appeared and that Jesus did not confront him until eight days had passed. Given the information that John provides us, Mark would have to mean eight days later when he writes, "Later,..." John is an eyewitness to the events since he is one of the "eleven" and there is no reason for us not to believe him. Given the specificity in John's account and the ambiguity in Mark's account, we should understand the ambiguous Mark in light of the specific John.
I'm sorry, but your conflated scenario, though elaborate, is patently unworkable. How could Mark be referring to the SECOND appearance of Jesus when Mark says Jesus rebuked THEM (the eleven) for their hardness of heart in not believing others when they said they had seen Jesus? That could ONLY be referring to Jesus' FIRST appearance, since only Thomas is still a doubter by the second one.

And why do you say that Jesus ate with the "ten" in Luke when Luke tells us quite specifically and unequivocally that "eleven" disciples were present? You may want to send Thomas out for a bathroom break, but there is not a thing in Luke's own account to suggest that anything fewer than the eleven were there. In fact, he goes out of his way to cite the exact number of disciples present.

What you are doing is, quite simply, a travesty to the original authors.
Roland is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:57 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.