Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
01-03-2008, 04:11 AM | #101 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 2,366
|
Judging from this, I take it you have never questioned your beliefs or considered the claims of others?
|
01-03-2008, 04:39 AM | #102 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 9,059
|
Quote:
You take '......it shall not be forgiven him,...' to mean it not only shall not be forgiven but cannot be forgiven under no circumstances whatsoever. I take '......it shall not be forgiven him,...' to mean it shall not be forgiven if nothing changes but that it can be forgiven if those circumstances change. We might use Saul/Paul as an example. Saul went around persecuting the church. We can say that he "spoke against the Son of man" according to Matthew 12:32. On the road to Damascus, Saul was confronted by the Holy Spirit. Had Saul rejected the Holy Spirit at that point and continued to persecute the church, we could conclude that he had blasphemed the Holy Spirit and would never receive salvation. That would be true. However, I do not see that a rejection by Saul on the road to Damascus would prevent God from providing a second Damascus Road experience if He chose to do so. The conclusion is that the Holy Spirit witnesses that Christ is God. This was done in the form of miracles before the Pharisees. The Pharisees attributed the miracles to Satan thus blaspheming the witness of the Holy Spirit. Because of that, those Pharisees could not be saved unless something happened to change their situation. Saul, who claimed that according to the strictest sect of the Jewish religion he lived a Pharisee, might well have attributed the miracles of Jesus to Satan. However, his circumstances changed on the road to Damascus. He later claimed that he was forgiven because all that he did was done in ignorance. So it is for all of us. Similarly, Joan of Bark can reject the testimony of the Scriptures through which the Holy Spirit witnesses that Christ is God and by doing so, she can be said to blaspheme the Holy Spirit. However, that would not prevent her having a Damascus Road experience at some later date that would turn her situation around and she would then look back on her life and marvel at her earlier ignorance. For the present, a person's rejection of the witness of the Holy Spirit by rejecting the Scriptures that tell us that Christ is God means that the person can be certain that such blasphemy shall not be forgiven. So long as the person continues in this blasphemy, they will not enter into heaven. |
|
01-03-2008, 04:48 AM | #103 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 9,059
|
Quote:
What should I question about my beliefs? Should I question the idea that a person is accountable for what he does and will receive the reward for his sin? If it is true, what good does it do to question it? If it is false, how would I know? |
|
01-03-2008, 04:54 AM | #104 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 9,059
|
Quote:
|
||
01-03-2008, 05:00 AM | #105 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 2,366
|
Quote:
I think about what there is proof for, the consistancy of the claims and the actions as they pertain to the teachings - to do any less is to throw common sense and logic out the window and be at the mercy of emotion-diven fears. And, IMO, be a hypocrite. |
||
01-03-2008, 05:03 AM | #106 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 2,366
|
Quote:
|
|
01-03-2008, 05:05 AM | #107 | |||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 9,059
|
Quote:
So now we have the Bible which God is claimed to have inspired men to write and the Koran which Allah is claimed to have inspired Mohammed to write. I guess we get to choose between the two which one to believe, God or Allah. I will go with God as he has provided a means for my sins to be forgiven. From what the Muslims tell me, Allah has not done this. Let's limit the canon to those books written be recognized prophets of God, the apostles of Christ who were taught by Christ and those who were closely associated with the apostles of Christ and recorded the apostles' activities. |
|||
01-03-2008, 05:07 AM | #108 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 9,059
|
Quote:
|
|
01-03-2008, 06:17 AM | #109 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 5,815
|
Quote:
So you'd rather take the accounts of human "eyewitnesses" over the actual words of God himself. An odd choice. And, AFAIK, you get to go to Heaven just for being a Muslim, unless you've really screwed up bigtime. What sort of "sins" are we talking about here, rhutchin? Quote:
|
||
01-03-2008, 10:58 AM | #110 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: California
Posts: 748
|
Quote:
And why do you say that Jesus ate with the "ten" in Luke when Luke tells us quite specifically and unequivocally that "eleven" disciples were present? You may want to send Thomas out for a bathroom break, but there is not a thing in Luke's own account to suggest that anything fewer than the eleven were there. In fact, he goes out of his way to cite the exact number of disciples present. What you are doing is, quite simply, a travesty to the original authors. |
||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|