![]()  | 
	
		Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#11 | 
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jan 2005 
				Location: U.S. 
				
				
					Posts: 1,398
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Moses was directed by God  to kill all the first born non-Jewish male babies... 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Abraham was directed by God ready and willing to kill his first born son. So Moses and his God were baby killers...I wonder what the Bible thumping anti-abortionists would say to this-- I guess God says it's all right to kill babies and children AFTER they are born, just not before. :Cheeky:  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#12 | |
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Feb 2005 
				Location: Hawaii 
				
				
					Posts: 6,629
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 Fair's fair.  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#13 | |
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jul 2004 
				Location: Santa Rosa, CA 
				
				
					Posts: 2,817
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 ARE YOU KIDDING ME?  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#14 | |
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Feb 2005 
				Location: Hawaii 
				
				
					Posts: 6,629
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 Quit blaming god. You don't have to do what he tells you to do. Nor did Moses. It's a poor defense for a hit man to claim he was just following orders.  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#15 | 
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				Location: home 
				
				
					Posts: 3,715
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I don't think Moses would have blamed God. He would have taken pride for being able to follow God's instructions so accurately, regardless of his personal feelings towards his victims.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#16 | |
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Feb 2005 
				Location: Hawaii 
				
				
					Posts: 6,629
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#17 | 
| 
			
			 Banned 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Aug 2004 
				Location: Jupiter Station 
				
				
					Posts: 658
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			hard to reconcile the morality of past civilizations with our own.  when tried by this light, most records of years past find themselves wanting in many respects, great and small.   even the societal standards of no more than one or two generations past seem horrific when measured by our own ever-evolving sensibilities.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#18 | 
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Nov 2004 
				Location: North Carolina 
				
				
					Posts: 3,074
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			The first question I would ask in reply is "Does God have the prerogative to determine the time and manner of a person's death?" The question here seems to essentially involve the question of whether God ever has a right to decree this. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	2 Kings 5:7 As soon as the king of Israel read the letter, he tore his robes and said, "Am I God? Can I kill and bring back to life?" Then a second question can be asked, "Does God involve people in carrying out his decisions?" We do see this in the Bible, with Abraham, and with the Israelites, now carrying out Hitler's orders was a war crime, but we must ask and answer the first question, before we can conclude that carrying out a judgment of death prescribed by God must be similar. Regards, Lee  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#19 | |
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				Location: home 
				
				
					Posts: 3,715
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 Beauty and a Beast? How to Treat a Woman Right! I don't know if these laws were ever in practice, as Deuteronomy was composed at the earliest in the late days of the kingdom of Judah, when it was declining, and the next Jewish battleground victories were under the Hasmoneans, but centuries later men who considered themselves to be civilised were debating under what conditions rape could be acceptable, because a book they considered holy dealt with the issue. For me this is a demonstration of the dangers of ascribing divine origin to words.  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#20 | |
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Nov 2004 
				Location: North Carolina 
				
				
					Posts: 3,074
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 But the limits of the laws were not always set at the actual boundary between sinning and not sinning, just as in some properties, there are fences outside the fences. And the real boundary is not so much between actions, but between motives. If the motive is love, that keeps the law, if it is not, that breaks it, says Paul the Jewish rabbi: Romans 13:10 Love does no harm to its neighbor. Therefore love is the fulfillment of the law. So yes, the law forbids rape, and forcing a woman to be married to you just to suit you... Regards, Lee  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
		
  |