FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.

Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Reload this Page squbble over burden of proof split from Prophecy Vague?
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM
Search

 
Page 1 of 2 1 2
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-05-2008, 10:45 AM   #1
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: georgia
Posts: 2,726
Default squbble over burden of proof split from Prophecy Vague?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshonq View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman View Post
"At its peak in the 12th century, the empire comprised blah blah blah
All of which is irrelevant, since the HRE is not the successor to the Roman Empire. If there was a "successor", it was the Byzantine Empire.

Care to try again?
Source please.
sugarhitman is offline  
Old 04-05-2008, 10:47 AM   #2
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: georgia
Posts: 2,726
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshonq View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman View Post
Sheshong is going to far now, by saying that Israel was not a nation during the times of Rome.
That is what the historical record says. Don't like it? Tough shit.
Source please.
sugarhitman is offline  
Old 04-05-2008, 11:06 AM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The temple of Isis at Memphis
Posts: 1,484
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshonq View Post
All of which is irrelevant, since the HRE is not the successor to the Roman Empire. If there was a "successor", it was the Byzantine Empire.

Care to try again?
Source please.
You were the first one with the claim. Burden of proof falls on your back, not mine.
Sheshonq is offline  
Old 04-05-2008, 11:07 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The temple of Isis at Memphis
Posts: 1,484
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshonq View Post
That is what the historical record says. Don't like it? Tough shit.
Source please.
Same answer.

You were the first one with the claim. Burden of proof falls on your back, not mine.
Sheshonq is offline  
Old 04-05-2008, 11:17 AM   #5
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: georgia
Posts: 2,726
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshonq View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman View Post

Source please.
Same answer.

You were the first one with the claim. Burden of proof falls on your back, not mine.
This tactic will not help you...you say that Israel was not a nation during Rome...prove it....or confess that you are wrong.
sugarhitman is offline  
Old 04-05-2008, 11:50 AM   #6
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: georgia
Posts: 2,726
Default
Sheshong has exit the building folks.
sugarhitman is offline  
Old 04-05-2008, 12:00 PM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The temple of Isis at Memphis
Posts: 1,484
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshonq View Post

You were the first one with the claim. Burden of proof falls on your back, not mine.
ha,ha!, what historical sources says that the Western portions of the Roman empire (West Rome, and Holy Rome) are not connected to the Roman Empire? And that the Europeans are distinct from the Romans....the burden is on you to disprove my sources....with your present comment I guess you cant find none....excepting yourself ofcourse.
You're the one who is claiming that the HRE is the successor to the Roman Empire. That's your claim, and your burden of proof.

You have presented no sources to support that claim; probably because it's bullshit to begin with.
Sheshonq is offline  
Old 04-05-2008, 12:01 PM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The temple of Isis at Memphis
Posts: 1,484
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshonq View Post

Same answer.

You were the first one with the claim. Burden of proof falls on your back, not mine.
This tactic will not help you...you say that Israel was not a nation during Rome...prove it....or confess that you are wrong.
Sorry; the rules of evidence don't change just because you're too lazy to do the homework. You made a claim for fulfilled prophecy and Israel being a nation during Roman times.

Your claim, your burden of proof. So get off your ass and prove it.
Sheshonq is offline  
Old 04-05-2008, 12:14 PM   #9
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: georgia
Posts: 2,726
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshonq View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman View Post

ha,ha!, what historical sources says that the Western portions of the Roman empire (West Rome, and Holy Rome) are not connected to the Roman Empire? And that the Europeans are distinct from the Romans....the burden is on you to disprove my sources....with your present comment I guess you cant find none....excepting yourself ofcourse.
You're the one who is claiming that the HRE is the successor to the Roman Empire. That's your claim, and your burden of proof.

You have presented no sources to support that claim; probably because it's bullshit to begin with.


What source you have to disprove it? Show to us the readers, that you have it. And dont get mad at me because you have none that seperates the Europeans from Rome.
sugarhitman is offline  
Old 04-05-2008, 12:19 PM   #10
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: georgia
Posts: 2,726
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshonq View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman View Post

This tactic will not help you...you say that Israel was not a nation during Rome...prove it....or confess that you are wrong.
Sorry; the rules of evidence don't change just because you're too lazy to do the homework. You made a claim for fulfilled prophecy and Israel being a nation during Roman times.

Your claim, your burden of proof. So get off your ass and prove it.
HE, he, you have no source....which is why you have resorted to this. If anyone can prove that Israel was not a nation during Rome bring forth your source. (Most of you will not even try this one, because you are smarter than some like....) :wave:
sugarhitman is offline  
 
Page 1 of 2 1 2

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:20 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.