Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
09-22-2010, 12:44 PM | #1 | ||||
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Happy Birthday Jesus on Sept 23
Christmas in September
James Tabor Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
09-22-2010, 02:13 PM | #2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
Interesting but the bottom line for me at least is that the Marcionites didn't recognize those portions of Luke. As such they have little value in determining the age of an angelic hypostasis.
|
09-22-2010, 02:42 PM | #3 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Albuquerque. SW USA
Posts: 3,176
|
As a history book the Bible leaves a lot to be desired, Toto.
Do you celebrate Earth Creation Day on Oct. 23rd, as well (cf: Ussher chronology)? |
09-22-2010, 05:15 PM | #4 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
|
09-22-2010, 08:49 PM | #5 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11,525
|
So Jesus was born at the fall equinox, and died at the spring equinox.
|
09-22-2010, 08:57 PM | #6 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: land of the home, free of the brave
Posts: 9,729
|
|
09-22-2010, 09:09 PM | #7 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 79
|
Quote:
I do like the suggestion that Joseph and Mary may have been making the fall pilgrimage to the temple, and that Jesus may have been born in a booth rather than a manger. It's...well, it's pretty much infinitely more believable than either of our traditional birth narratives. It also dovetails nicely with Matthew's dramatic device of presenting Jesus as a Moses figure. Aside from that bit of insight, all of these hypotheses basically require Luke's birth narrative to be more or less historically accurate, and we have no reason to assume that (and some good reasons to doubt it). We also have no reason outside of Luke's account (which is most likely a literary device modeled on Samuel) to make a biological connection between John and Jesus. So, it's a fun bit of mostly baseless speculation. And on that note, everyone just missed it but 9/22 is the birthday of both Bilbo and Frodo Baggins! |
|
09-26-2010, 12:31 PM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 425
|
The birth of John the Baptist is detailed in Luke 1:24-38 and it does say that John and Jesus were conceived 6 months apart. John the baptists birthday known as St. John's Day is celebrated on June 24th - 3 days after the summer solstice. So, that would put Jesus' birth day at Christmas.
However, it says in the Gospel of John at 3:30 "He must increase, but I must decrease." We've heard that scripture before referring to John the baptist "decreasing" so that Jesus may "increase." Well, from the summer solstice heading towards the winter solstice the sun could be said to "decrease" in strength while from the winter solstice to the summer solstice, it would be increasing in strength. Is this a subtle clue of Jesus' solar attributes? The Origins of Christianity and the Quest for the Historical Jesus Christ |
09-27-2010, 06:54 AM | #9 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11,525
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|