Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
05-27-2005, 12:48 PM | #11 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,629
|
Quote:
What choice would you make for the operation? |
|
05-27-2005, 01:23 PM | #12 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 2,293
|
Quote:
However, afaik, my non-vestigial appendix is doing very well, thanks. Shalom, Praxeas http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Messianic_Apologetic/ |
|
05-27-2005, 01:27 PM | #13 |
Moderator -
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 4,639
|
Praxeus, Wyatt claimed that he had found the Ark of the Covenant and was keeping it in his basement. Do you believe him?
Getting back to the OP, it's an interesting article that doesn't seem to be associated with any of Wyatt's dog and pony show or even to be arguing that the mountain in question is the "Mount Sinai" of Exodus in any literal, historical sense but that it was a site of cultic worship for a number of different tribes in the 3rd millenium BCE, and that this fact, along with some geographical features which are similar to what is dscribed in Exodus, may indicate that the mountain was used as a model for part of the Moses myth. If there was already a legendary "Mountain of God" known to ancient tribal memory, I suppose it's not a strech for the myth-making process to assign it as the place where Moses received the law. |
05-27-2005, 06:17 PM | #14 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,190
|
Yes, that's what I think to.
But according to the article in "Illustrerad Vetenskap", Anati wants to place the exodus about 1000 years earlier than what most (right?) of today's archaeologists do. It also seems like he's asserting that the Egyptian story of Sinuhe is inspired by Moses's adventures, and not vice versa. |
05-27-2005, 07:07 PM | #15 | |
Moderator -
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 4,639
|
Quote:
|
|
05-27-2005, 11:55 PM | #16 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,629
|
Quote:
Want to try again? Thanks. |
|
05-28-2005, 05:01 AM | #17 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,190
|
Do the genealogies in the OT allow the exodus to be placed 1000 years earlier without any "shoehorning" (or even with)?
|
05-28-2005, 05:17 AM | #18 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
|
ROFL. As numerous Christian groups have pointed out, Wyatt is 100% fraud. Here are some links:
http://www.tentmaker.org/WAR/ A really in-depth site here: http://www.isitso.org/guide/wyatt.html This one is not even worth debating. |
05-28-2005, 09:07 AM | #19 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Western Sweden
Posts: 3,684
|
A couple of years ago, if I found no error in an article in the Illustrerad vetenskap, I re-read it to find what I overlooked. They're mostly better now, and I still subscribe. Much of the stuff is sufficiently interesting to make me look for facts.
In the Mt. Sinai story, they mention that several claims from "Biblical archeologists" are seen as forgeries by others, citing the James ossuary and the Tell Dan stela, and they hint at the political aspects motivating searches for indications of early Israelites. |
05-28-2005, 10:03 AM | #20 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: home
Posts: 3,715
|
My impression is that Anati is on the boundary between solid academics (a mountain that had been revered since pre-historical times as an inspiration for a later story) and wishful thinking to validate personal beliefs.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|