FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-20-2006, 06:28 PM   #1
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default Elaine Pagels to speak in LA Jan 17 2007 on the Gospel of Judas

Gnostic Gospels: The Newly Discovered Gospel of Judas
Date: Wednesday January 17, 2007, at 7 pm
Location: Harold M. Williams Auditorium, Getty Center
Admission: Free. Reservation required

reserve tickets here
Toto is offline  
Old 01-20-2007, 01:50 PM   #2
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

The LA Times has an interview with Pagels: Continued discovery within 'secret gospels'

Quote:
Pagels argues that the truth, like everything else about these papyrus manuscripts, is complicated.

"We're learning new things about them all the time," said Pagels, 53, who lectured at the Getty Center on Wednesday about the newly discovered Gospel of Judas. "In fact, if I was writing it today, I wouldn't use the term 'Gnostic' in the title of my first book.

"I'd use something else, like 'the other Christian gospels,' because what was found in that jar in Egypt was a miscellaneous collection of early Christian gospels and other texts. We can't generalize about them."
The story goes on to note that Pagels is mentioned on the first sentence of the first chapter of The Complete Idiot's Guide to the Gnostic Gospels (The Complete Idiot's Guide) (or via: amazon.co.uk).

Pagel thinks that these other gospels were for the advanced students of early Christianity - after they learned the basic stories in Mark etc., they were given the "higher truth" of these "other gospels."
Toto is offline  
Old 01-20-2007, 02:57 PM   #3
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

Quote:
Where do they rank in comparison with the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John?

I think of them now as the other texts that were not included in the canon. Much of what was in the canon was to be used in public church. But, as in Judaism, there were certain secret teachings — or advanced teachings — that were not to be taught publicly or even written down.

They were only to be shared with certain disciples when they were ready. In other words, the New Testament Gospels were the texts students of Christianity began with. Some moved on to the secret teachings.
Would that be a killer discovery to the historicity of Jesus - that MMLJ are introductory primers for students?
Clivedurdle is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:33 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.