Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
10-25-2009, 01:54 AM | #1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: England
Posts: 5,629
|
Paul, Jesus and the miracle of the resurrection
1 Corinthians 1
For since in the wisdom of God the world through its wisdom did not know him, God was pleased through the foolishness of what was preached to save those who believe. Jews demand miraculous signs and Greeks look for wisdom, but we preach Christ crucified: a stumbling block to Jews and foolishness to Gentiles, but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God. Paul claims that when he preaches , he preaches Christ crucified. He does not respond to Jewish demands that Christianity be accompanied by miraculous signs. So did Paul just bite his tongue when he was taunted to explain what sort of miracles proved that this Jesus really was the Christ? If there had been a resurrection, how could Paul have reacted to Jewish demands for miraculous signs by claiming he was not in the business of preaching about them, he was in the business of preaching the crucifixion? Surely all that stuff in Acts 17 is nonsense. Paul himself says why some people were scoffing at Christianity. It was because of the crucifixion. He didn't even preach the resurrection, which would have been one of those 'miraculous signs' that Jews demanded, and which Christianity was not in the business of supplying. |
10-25-2009, 03:21 AM | #2 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
|
|
10-25-2009, 09:18 PM | #3 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
Quote:
See 1 Corinthians 15.17 Quote:
|
||
10-26-2009, 12:27 AM | #4 | |||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: England
Posts: 5,629
|
Quote:
Perhaps I should have been more clear. Paul did not preach the resurrection as a miraculous sign, something that could have been seen. Jews demanded miraculous signs, but he preached Christ crucified. If there had been a resurrection of a corpse leaving an earthly tomb, that would have been a stumbling block to Jews , not a crucifixion. |
|||
10-26-2009, 09:45 AM | #5 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
Quote:
Thousands of Jews were crucified but only one was claimed to have resurrected after the third day. The resurrection is the proof that Jesus was God and not just a man. Now, the crucifixion of a God must be a stumbling block to the Jews who followed the Laws of the God of Moses. |
||
10-26-2009, 12:15 PM | #6 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
|
Quote:
He responds by appealing to the crucified Christ as showing God's plan being worked out in seeming weakness. Andrew Criddle |
||
10-26-2009, 02:01 PM | #7 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 3,397
|
Quote:
|
||
10-26-2009, 07:46 PM | #8 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
|
Quote:
Some on this forum have interpreted it as referring to some sort of visual depiction of the crucifixion but I doubt whether prographw can really mean this. The verb could certainly refer to the display of an official document but this doesn't seem relevant here. Andrew Criddle |
|
10-26-2009, 09:21 PM | #9 | |||
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11,525
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
10-26-2009, 09:30 PM | #10 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11,525
|
Quote:
The messianic dream itself is the childish idea that Paul put aside (aka, crucified), not some wandering carpenter-made-cult-leader from the po-dunk town of Nazareth. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|