FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-21-2007, 01:44 AM   #1
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: denver
Posts: 11,319
Default Gen 10:20 and then 11:1

I have a question for the experts out there.

Gen 10:20 and before that describes the spreading out of Noah's families after the flood and 10:20 says these are Ham's nations and languages. But yet you turn to 11 and it's the story of the Tower of Babel and it says the world had one language. So how can the family of Noah spread throughout the world with their languages but turn around in the next paragraph and say there was only one language?

I know the rabbis have come up with some explanation but the simple solution is two well known myths had to be included in the story and the combiner didn't proofread.

Mike
coloradoatheist is offline  
Old 06-21-2007, 06:30 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 932
Default

From which comes the Documentary Hypothesis.
gregor is offline  
Old 06-21-2007, 06:37 AM   #3
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Allen, Tx
Posts: 604
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gregor View Post
From which comes the Documentary Hypothesis.
Really? Care to elaborate on what you think the 'documentary hypothesis' is and why it applies here?
Riverwind is offline  
Old 06-21-2007, 06:37 PM   #4
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: denver
Posts: 11,319
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverwind View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregor View Post
From which comes the Documentary Hypothesis.
Really? Care to elaborate on what you think the 'documentary hypothesis' is and why it applies here?

Because look at the two stories. Gen 10 ends with saying thatthat all the sons of Noah spread out creating nations and languages. Then Gen 11 says that all the people were one language and they came together to build a tower. One author wouldn't make that mistake and would either have finished Gen 10 by saying hey all these people got off the boat, decided to get together and build a temple, etc. Or starting off Gen 11 the one author would have said instead of "they" coming from the east they would have been either Noah's kids or one group of Noah's family. There's two different stories here from history that had to be woven together somehow and the author just stuck Babel there.

Mike
coloradoatheist is offline  
Old 06-21-2007, 06:44 PM   #5
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: denver
Posts: 11,319
Default

Also Gen 11:1-9 make no sense because 10 finished with discussing Shem and then 11:10 starts with Shem again. It's a story out of place.


Mike
coloradoatheist is offline  
Old 06-22-2007, 12:01 PM   #6
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

Strange how god has difficulty getting competent editors...
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 06-30-2007, 09:54 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: 36078
Posts: 849
Default

What are the rabbi apologies/explanations?

I'll take a guess that the apology offered is that the information given in Gen 10 and 11 isn't in chronological order.

How'd I do?
Cege is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:16 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.