Ted Hoffman

I really wouldn't presume that someone who has falsely implied that an unnamed Professor said something, while that Professor in fact did not, would report truthfully on what Doherty's opinion is on an issue that same individual is seeking support on.

You really believe Doherty "joined" Jeffrey in such a superficial issue?

jgibson000

Sorry, Ted, but you have your head up your keester on both points.

Search the archives and you'll see.

Now, where are the citations and the texts you owe the list?

Jeffrey Gibson

Ted Hoffman

I wont search the archives. Doherty may have agreed in passing about the issue but only because his experience with fundies is that when they get thoroughly stumped, they withdraw and after some hiatus they register and resurface under an different name and masquerade as new challengers. Only to be trounced again.
Plus, his issue is mainly with difficult names, not nick-names.
But Doherty definitely doesn't dwell interminably on names and get hysterical when he is called by his second name Doherty, which, by the way, is not - what was that again? - "abrupt" like Gibson.
Plus, doherty doesn't add three silly zeroes to his name. Do you aspire to become three binary digits when you grow up or is it that you mean to indicate that you are to be associated with null and void points?
This is not a list. I do not owe the forum a damn thing.
I thought you and Rick had an agreement? Need I refresh your memory?

Toto

Ted: Doherty has made a few comments about screen names that are unpronounceable or don't give a clue as to their nature.

Jeffrey claims to have provided proof of the statements by the anonymous Professor that you allude to above, to Chris Weimer, who is not a moderator of this forum. The moderators in BCH have no personal knowledge of the issue.

Since this dispute is entirely too personal for this board, I am locking this.