FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-28-2004, 01:50 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: AZ, u.s.a.
Posts: 1,202
Default Deut. 29:29...'Obey forever'?

Deuteronomy 29
29 The secret things belong to the LORD our God, but the things revealed belong to us and to our children forever, that we may follow all the words of this law.


Arguing about the kashrut on another board, I referenced the above verse but reproduced it (from a post by a member on these boards) using different wording..."Deut 29:29 ...he has revealed his law and we and our descendants are to obey it forever."

Searching through Bible-gateway.com, I could not find the verse as worded by the II poster and, after looking at the 'actual' passage, I am not quite convinced that it is saying what that poster (and I) have purported it to say.

So: does the verse mean (to say) that Israel and her children (to whom the Law was revealed and belongs) are to follow the Law forever? Or no?
Sensei Meela is offline  
Old 01-28-2004, 02:18 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Land of Make Believe
Posts: 781
Cool

There's several verses in the Hebrew Scriptures (Old Testament) that state in one way or another that the Jewish Law should be followed forever. No, I'm not going to dig up the verses here. If someone else feels like it, you'll find them.
motorhead is offline  
Old 01-31-2004, 08:27 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: AZ, u.s.a.
Posts: 1,202
Default

To be fair, I think it's more or less only inferred from the passages, and not stated as a direct command (as in 'thou shalt obey forever' or whatnot). Unregardless...

...supposing, then, that the Law is to be obeyed forever, would it not constitute a 'change' to the Law -- directly contrary to what Jesus allegedly said in Matt 5:17-18 -- to declare all foods clean (as he did in Mark 7:19)?

Wouldn't it be a change (not to mention a series of tenuous intrepretations) to make the Law 'not binding' to anyone but Christ (and, presumably those 'children of Israel' who didn't accept him)?

And, as a child of Israel (through two conflicting genealogies!), wouldn't Jesus himself be 'bound' to them (if he is to 'fulfill them for us', as is commonly preached)?
Sensei Meela is offline  
Old 02-01-2004, 04:19 AM   #4
New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 4
Default

I believe it's stated somewhere in the text not to change any law "to the right or the left". However, I don't have a bible handy..
Freethinker2004 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:05 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.