Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
10-13-2008, 11:54 PM | #1 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Beast Coast
Posts: 217
|
"You have to read it in context!"
How often do you hear someone defend a sordid statement, act, or command in the Bible by telling you to read the context? At what point does the apologist go full meta - the way a rationalist usually does - and say "Well if you consider it in the context of the culture of the people who wrote the Bible, then it makes perfect sense that they would stone homosexuals"?
For example, Acts 3:23 declares that all who do not accept Jesus "shall be destroyed from among the people." I can kind of see this being read to mean "cut off" or "exiled," but still, I'm sure it has been interpreted more often to mean that non-believers should be killed. |
10-14-2008, 03:11 AM | #2 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Myjava, Slovakia
Posts: 384
|
First of all, I don't think early Christians by time of composition of Acts (late 1st/early 2nd century) were in position to kill anybody for belief.
|
10-14-2008, 08:35 PM | #3 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Beast Coast
Posts: 217
|
Quote:
Also worth bringing up: 2 Corinthians 6:14-17 says non-believers should be shunned. Deuteronomy 17:6-10 says they should be killed. Matthew and Luke say love your enemy. Even discounting Deuteronomy for the traditional "The Old Testament doesn't count!" bit, I'm told to read 2 Corinthians "in context" to avoid a contradiction. Huh? |
|
10-15-2008, 04:33 AM | #4 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: vienna
Posts: 74
|
I'd just kindly ask them in what context, and how they think that would change the meaning?
|
10-15-2008, 05:01 AM | #5 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
|
Quote:
|
|
10-15-2008, 07:47 AM | #6 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,305
|
Quote:
The bias against homosexuality could be seen as the flip of encouraging families and numerical security. One theory I've heard is that the Hebrews brought an essentially Bedouin desert morality into a more urbanized context (Canaan). |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|