FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.

Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Reload this Page discussion of creationist insults split from why do mainstream scholars...
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM
Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-27-2011, 09:13 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bli Bli
Posts: 3,135
Default discussion of creationist insults split from why do mainstream scholars...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
[
In fact, the historical Jesus so called experts have more in common with creationists than with scientists who study evolution.
Toto yesterday you censored me for suggesting a commet of earls sounded like creationism Now you are doing the same thing.
Can we have some consistency please?
judge is offline  
Old 06-27-2011, 09:16 PM   #2
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: MT
Posts: 10,656
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by judge View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
[
In fact, the historical Jesus so called experts have more in common with creationists than with scientists who study evolution.
Toto yesterday you censored me for suggesting earl was like a creationist.
Now you are doing the same thing.
Can we have some consistency please?
It is against forum rules to insult forum members directly.
ApostateAbe is offline  
Old 06-27-2011, 09:18 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bli Bli
Posts: 3,135
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by ApostateAbe View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by judge View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
[
In fact, the historical Jesus so called experts have more in common with creationists than with scientists who study evolution.
Toto yesterday you censored me for suggesting earl was like a creationist.
Now you are doing the same thing.
Can we have some consistency please?
It is against forum rules to insult forum members directly.
What i actually said was that his comment "sounded like creationism". Not that he was a creationist.

Not only that I received some kind of warning for just mentioning creationism (as it was "off topic), not for insulting anyone
judge is offline  
Old 06-27-2011, 09:25 PM   #4
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: MT
Posts: 10,656
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by judge View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by ApostateAbe View Post
It is against forum rules to insult forum members directly.
What i actually said was that his comment "sounded like creationism". Not that he was a creationist.

Not only that I received some kind of warning for just mentioning creationism (as it was "off topic), not for insulting anyone
Talking about moderator actions is also against the rules, so I hope you will take your complaint to the admins instead of discussing it here further.
ApostateAbe is offline  
Old 06-27-2011, 09:29 PM   #5
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by judge View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
[
In fact, the historical Jesus so called experts have more in common with creationists than with scientists who study evolution.
Toto yesterday you censored me for suggesting a commet of earls sounded like creationism Now you are doing the same thing.
Can we have some consistency please?
Under the rules you may not insult anyone who is posting in the thread. But you may insult public figures who are not part of the conversation.

And you may not discuss moderator actions in thread. This will be split off.
Toto is offline  
 

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:51 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.