FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-09-2008, 12:17 PM   #1
vid
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Myjava, Slovakia
Posts: 384
Default Hell in aramaic

Regarding Aramaic primacy: is there any word in aramaic for "hell"? One that could be translated to Gehenna, or Hades, used in NT...
vid is offline  
Old 10-09-2008, 03:16 PM   #2
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

A quick check reveals mostly gehenna and the rest sheol -- working from the Syriac of the Peshitta.


spin
spin is offline  
Old 10-09-2008, 08:33 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bli Bli
Posts: 3,135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vid View Post
Regarding Aramaic primacy: is there any word in aramaic for "hell"? One that could be translated to Gehenna, or Hades, used in NT...
Gehenna is an Aramaic word. It occurs for example in an Aramaic targum of Isaiah 66 which reads " . . . will not die and their fire shall not be quenched, and the wicked shall be judged in Gehenna. . . ."

It occurs here in the peshitta of Luke 12:5

Sheol, also Aramaic (..and Hebrew ) occurs in the peshitta of Luke 16:23
judge is offline  
Old 10-10-2008, 03:21 AM   #4
vid
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Myjava, Slovakia
Posts: 384
Red face

Thanks, I didn't realize Gehenna is aramic. How did they use it in greek, just letter-for-letter translation?

Also, does this mean Jews had concept of hell (similar to hell as we know it now, Hades) of their own, even before helenization in last BCE centuries? Or was it just "you will go into that stinking southern valley and burn there inside junk"?
vid is offline  
Old 10-10-2008, 04:27 AM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bli Bli
Posts: 3,135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vid View Post
Thanks, I didn't realize Gehenna is aramic. How did they use it in greek, just letter-for-letter translation?
GEHENNA - ga-hen'-a (geenna (see Grimm-Thayer, under the word)): Gehenna is a transliteration from the Aramaic form of the Hebrew ge-hinnom, "valley of Hinnom."
From net.bible-gehenna

Quote:
Originally Posted by vid View Post
Also, does this mean Jews had concept of hell (similar to hell as we know it now, Hades) of their own, even before helenization in last BCE centuries? Or was it just "you will go into that stinking southern valley and burn there inside junk"?
You will find arguments for the jews having and not having a concept similar to hades prior to Helenisation.
Which true I don't know.
Luke uses sheol in a way similar to the greek hades. Luke (or perhaps the gospels in general )uses Gehenna in a different sense.
In the gospels Gehenna seems to refer to the Valley outside Jerusalem but has also taken on eschatological signifigance IMHO.
judge is offline  
Old 10-10-2008, 04:32 AM   #6
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vid View Post
Thanks, I didn't realize Gehenna is aramic. How did they use it in greek, just letter-for-letter translation?
The word "gehenna" comes from the name of a valley in Jerusalem, the Valley of Hinnom [GY) HNM -> Gehenna], where sacrifices were made to the god Moloch. You can imagine that the valley developed a bad reputation in the consciousness of all those god-fearing Yahwists. Horrid abominations in Gehenna.

Quote:
Originally Posted by vid View Post
Also, does this mean Jews had concept of hell (similar to hell as we know it now, Hades) of their own, even before helenization in last BCE centuries?
Basically, in the Hebrew bible, no. Sheol was mostly used to parallel "death". There is of course the problem of Saul's getting the witch of Endor to call forth of Samuel after the latter's death. Although it was done through witchcraft, it complicates the interpretation of the act.

Things got further complicated when the notion of resurrection was introduced during the Hellenistic crisis in 167-164 BCE -- see Daniel, 2 Maccabees and 1 Enoch. People had to wait somewhere after death -- though the Sadducees may not have been in to the idea of resurrection.

Quote:
Originally Posted by vid View Post
Or was it just "you will go into that stinking southern valley and burn there inside junk"?
The classic Jewish notion was that a person lived on through their children. And when you is dead, you is dead. And that's it. However, it didn't stay that way.


spin
spin is offline  
Old 10-10-2008, 05:31 AM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Western Sweden
Posts: 3,684
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin View Post
The classic Jewish notion was that a person lived on through their children. And when you is dead, you is dead. And that's it.
spin
Yes, and specifically, the important thing was to propagate your "name". That's the basis for the rules on having your "name" continued, like in the laws that condemned poor Onan (Gen. 38) for not producing a child for his brother('s name) through his SIL that wouldn't have been counted as one of his own.
Lugubert is offline  
Old 10-10-2008, 06:14 AM   #8
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by anders View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by spin View Post
The classic Jewish notion was that a person lived on through their children. And when you is dead, you is dead. And that's it.
spin
Yes, and specifically, the important thing was to propagate your "name". That's the basis for the rules on having your "name" continued, like in the laws that condemned poor Onan (Gen. 38) for not producing a child for his brother('s name) through his SIL that wouldn't have been counted as one of his own.
Probably to have continuity in the reign of God that was also in their midst. This proposition is based on the inspired lineage as given in Luke after the dove descended upon him and of which the wedding in Cana is John's equivalent after Nathanael came tumbling out of the fig tree.
Chili is offline  
Old 10-10-2008, 06:14 AM   #9
vid
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Myjava, Slovakia
Posts: 384
Default

So Luke (and others) use aramaic words "Gehenna" and "Sheol" in otherwise Greek gospels? How are they transliterated, letter-for-letter? Would non-jewish helenistic readers understand meaning of these words?
vid is offline  
Old 10-10-2008, 12:34 PM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bli Bli
Posts: 3,135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vid View Post
So Luke (and others) use aramaic words "Gehenna" and "Sheol" in otherwise Greek gospels? How are they transliterated, letter-for-letter? Would non-jewish helenistic readers understand meaning of these words?
Gehenna yes, sheol no .

I had meant that the peshitta (which I linked to) uses both these words.

Maybe some greeks would have needed an explanation when they read gehenna I guess.

Gehenna may have been transliterated in order to differentiate if from hades (sheol).
judge is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:44 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.