FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-29-2006, 07:51 AM   #461
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 9,059
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JPD View Post
rhutchin
OK. Then who does it? Would you favor enforcing standards if you were excluded from setting those standards?

JPD
A group made up from all walks of life - a full range of beliefs and non-beliefs.
So, if such a group established standards, you would be willing to enforce the standards if they reflected beliefs with which you did not agree?

Suppose such a group included two people with conflicting beliefs so that following one would necessitate not following the other. What compromise would be agreeable to you -- following one belief or the other, or not following either belief?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JPD View Post
rhutchin
Then you must have another system for establishing standards. Can you divulge any details about it?

JPD
Growth and development for all. No religious indoctrination of children. Non-biased exposure to as wide a range of ideas as possible. More equal distribution of resources. People on benefits must do some form of work for their money unless their illness or other disability makes this impossible. Accountability for one's actions. Punishment has to have something in it that the criminal can engage with to break out of the cycle of harm to self and to others.

The problem is that any course of action, whatever its foundations, exhibits a degree of shooting itself in the foot and being hypocritical. What I am keen not to see, however, is the implementation of a system that meted out punishment in an entirely different society from today's under the cloud of belief in, or negative reaction to, the potential of an all-powerful entity that, through time, has been able to hide in fewer and fewer places. In other words, a dwindling justification.
In other words, it's your way or the highway.
rhutchin is offline  
Old 11-29-2006, 07:52 AM   #462
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: u.k, back of beyond, we have scones and cream teas
Posts: 2,534
Default

rhutchin: As far as I can acertain, when I die either A: something will happen AFTERWARDS or B: Nothing will happen afterwards. The evidence tends to point to A as we have inanimate corpses and no proof of supernatural goings on whatsoever. B is imaginary, I could also claim equally viably that C: (everyone else will get a pimple when I die) is true. in fact, I could claim C, and argue C far more successfully than B, as many people do get pimples, therefore, who is to say that they don't all get one because of my death?

There is a viable position contrary to the Bible, and that could be one of any number of other holy books held by other faiths, or the "proof" clause. IE: A and C are more viable than B.

I personally believe in the Lord of the Rings, Saraman exists and causes us to sin, the White Wizard will lead us to salvation if we only believe in him. Of course this book was only supposed to be taken in the sense that it is a long parable and only an idiot would think otherwise.
djrafikie is offline  
Old 11-29-2006, 07:57 AM   #463
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Orlando, Fl
Posts: 5,310
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhutchin View Post
So, if such a group established standards, you would be willing to enforce the standards if they reflected beliefs with which you did not agree?
Well, that is the result of democracy, isn't it? But I guess you want a dictatorship instead?
EarlOfLade is offline  
Old 11-29-2006, 08:47 AM   #464
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: England
Posts: 2,561
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhutchin View Post
You are a man of faith (that death results in annihilation). On what do you base your great faith?
It doesn't take faith to believe that death is the end. It takes a pair of eyes. We can see a human's physical body and we can see that after death that physical body no longer functions and will quickly decay.

On the other hand, to believe that the human being survives death you must believe that there is an invisible, intangible "extra" portion of a human being which is central to the human being's identity but which cannot be detected in any way, and that this "extra" portion carries on when detached from the body, not in this world but in another plane or dimension which is also, conveniently, invisible, intangible, and undetectable by any means. Of course, there's no evidence for any of this. Now that takes faith.
The Evil One is offline  
Old 11-29-2006, 09:00 AM   #465
JPD
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: London, UK
Posts: 5,322
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhutchin View Post
In other words, it's your way or the highway.
I would hope that intelligent people might see that what I consider to be worthy propositions have some foundation in common sense and not applying justice on the basis of what someone in a book says must be done to ensure eternal salvation.
JPD is offline  
Old 11-29-2006, 09:11 AM   #466
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 9,059
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JPD View Post
rhutchin
In other words, it's your way or the highway.

JPD
I would hope that intelligent people might see that what I consider to be worthy propositions have some foundation in common sense and not applying justice on the basis of what someone in a book says must be done to ensure eternal salvation.
Kinda what I think regarding the Bible. I guess an intelligent person is someone who agrees with us.
rhutchin is offline  
Old 11-29-2006, 09:17 AM   #467
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 9,059
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Evil One View Post
rhutchin
You are a man of faith (that death results in annihilation). On what do you base your great faith?

The Evil One
It doesn't take faith to believe that death is the end. It takes a pair of eyes. We can see a human's physical body and we can see that after death that physical body no longer functions and will quickly decay.

On the other hand, to believe that the human being survives death you must believe that there is an invisible, intangible "extra" portion of a human being which is central to the human being's identity but which cannot be detected in any way, and that this "extra" portion carries on when detached from the body, not in this world but in another plane or dimension which is also, conveniently, invisible, intangible, and undetectable by any means. Of course, there's no evidence for any of this. Now that takes faith.
It does not take faith to believe that which one can see. It takes faith to believe that which one cannot see. You certainly have faith in that which one cannot see.
rhutchin is offline  
Old 11-29-2006, 09:20 AM   #468
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 9,059
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EarlOfLade View Post
rhutchin
So, if such a group established standards, you would be willing to enforce the standards if they reflected beliefs with which you did not agree?

EarlOfLade
Well, that is the result of democracy, isn't it? But I guess you want a dictatorship instead?
I like democracies. They have their faults. A democracy can elect to follow the Bible in setting standards (which, to some extent, the US society does).
rhutchin is offline  
Old 11-29-2006, 09:22 AM   #469
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 9,059
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by djrafikie View Post
rhutchin: As far as I can acertain, when I die either A: something will happen AFTERWARDS or B: Nothing will happen afterwards. The evidence tends to point to A as we have inanimate corpses and no proof of supernatural goings on whatsoever. B is imaginary, I could also claim equally viably that C: (everyone else will get a pimple when I die) is true. in fact, I could claim C, and argue C far more successfully than B, as many people do get pimples, therefore, who is to say that they don't all get one because of my death?

There is a viable position contrary to the Bible, and that could be one of any number of other holy books held by other faiths, or the "proof" clause. IE: A and C are more viable than B.

I personally believe in the Lord of the Rings, Saraman exists and causes us to sin, the White Wizard will lead us to salvation if we only believe in him. Of course this book was only supposed to be taken in the sense that it is a long parable and only an idiot would think otherwise.
All people believe something about that which happens after death. You are entitled to your beliefs.
rhutchin is offline  
Old 11-29-2006, 09:55 AM   #470
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: u.k, back of beyond, we have scones and cream teas
Posts: 2,534
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhutchin View Post
All people believe something about that which happens after death. You are entitled to your beliefs.

Don't be obtuse, you are avoiding the point.

Anyhow, lets get to the meat of this. In your ideal world homos would be put to death, how about if YOU were accused unjustly and stoned to death? what would you be? A matyr? TO CHRISTIANITY?

what exactly do you think you are?
djrafikie is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:35 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.