Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
10-20-2005, 03:42 PM | #1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: USA, Missouri
Posts: 3,070
|
My Response/Review of Earl Doherty's Top 20 Silences
Mr. Doheryt's arguments against a historical Jesus are found here: http://www.jesuspuzzle.com/ I think his views that get the most attention are those with regard to the silences in the early Christian writings which he would not expect given an assumption of a historical Jesus as found in the gospels.
I have just completed a response to each of his top 20 silences, and welcome any feedback. My response can be found here: http://mypeoplepc.com/members/tedrika/dohertystop20/ ted |
10-21-2005, 07:21 AM | #2 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: USA, Missouri
Posts: 3,070
|
Quote:
ted |
|
10-21-2005, 07:42 AM | #3 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,307
|
Quote:
Fortunately, Firefox has an option to strip all formatting from web pages when viewing. I haven't read your whole set of pages, but I must say that I particularly liked your decision to summarize the various historical Jesuses according to Paul, 1 Peter, 1 John, Hebrews, the Didache, and 1 Clement in your conclusion. Regardless of the merits concerning particular details in your summations (which, in my admittedly cursory glance, I did not see anything noticeably out of whack), your decision to treat each of these potential sources independently on their own terms is refreshing. (By the way, which letters attributed to Paul did you use for your Pauline HJ?) Stephen |
|
10-21-2005, 07:59 AM | #4 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: USA, Missouri
Posts: 3,070
|
Quote:
For Pauls' HJ I used Rom, 1&2 Cor, Gal, Phil, 1 Thess, and Colossians. ted |
|
10-21-2005, 09:28 AM | #5 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,307
|
The font is still a little small, but Firefox helps me out.
Thanks for listing the letters supporting the Pauline HJ reconstruction. I'm curious to see what it would like without Colossians, whose Paulinity is more controversial than the others in the list. Perhaps, the items supported only by Colossians could be put into parentheses or brackets. |
10-21-2005, 11:36 AM | #6 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: USA, Missouri
Posts: 3,070
|
Quote:
Here's what I got from Colossians: Colossians, 4 chapters * His blood associated with the cross 1:20 * His body of flesh died 1:21 * In his body dwells deity 2:9 * Nailing associated with the cross 2:14 Only the last two have no other corroberation. ted |
|
10-23-2005, 11:56 AM | #7 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: USA, Missouri
Posts: 3,070
|
Quote:
|
|
10-24-2005, 08:53 AM | #8 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: USA, Missouri
Posts: 3,070
|
Quote:
I'm finished making revisions to the site. |
|
10-28-2005, 08:14 AM | #9 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: USA, Missouri
Posts: 3,070
|
Quote:
I must admit to being surprised at the lack of response. Should I have cussed Doherty out or something? ted |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|