Freethought & Rationalism Archive

Doug Shaver · 04-05-2007, 04:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by praxeus

I really am amazed that multiple skeptics/atheists actually see a problem here.

So, an error attributable to ignorance is not really an error, if the ignorance is easily enough excusable?

JCS · 04-05-2007, 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by praxeus

I really am amazed that multiple skeptics/atheists actually see a problem here. That is the amazing thing about this discussion.

Perhaps there is a type of skeptic box-locking involved ?

If the all powerful OZ/god was responsible for the bibles content, then mistakes seem rather important. But since it was written by men long on superstition and short on science it isn't suprising now is it.

RAFH · 04-05-2007, 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoodLittleAtheist

Strange, my bible doesn't have illustrations.

Really?! Man you missed it, I got the Hustler version, va-va-vavoom! Talk about biblical knowledge, this bugger is XXXtra-graphic.

RAFH · 04-05-2007, 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Weiss

And who needs that kind of god anyway?

Masochists?

RAFH · 04-05-2007, 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Agemegos

Yes, but they don't chew cud.

Yes, but they aren't birds.

Yes, but locusts don't have four legs, they have six.

Those other two are arms, not legs. So there, HaH!

Red Expendable · 04-05-2007, 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Visionary7

What do atheists believe about the Bible?

. . .

I believe the bible makes for some harsh toilet paper.

RedEx

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.