FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-25-2012, 10:45 PM   #21
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
aa5874: the argument in the OP is that the Essenes were really early Christians, or perhaps that Jesus was tied into the Essenes. If you are not going to post about the Essenes, stop posting in this thread.

We all know that Philo did not mention any Christians by name, and the only mention in Josephus is a likely interpolation.

Going on about differences between later Christian theology and pseudohistory does not show anything about what Christians might have been in the first century, if there were in fact any Christians.
Please, I am addressing the OP.

I am making COUNTER-ARGUMENTS AGAINST Pinkvoy that Philo did NOT write about Christians and Jesus when he mentioned the Essenes.

Please, examine what Pinkvoy posted.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinkvoy
..Philo, Josepheus, Pliny the Elder did write about the early Christians and Jesus, only they did not call them by that name...
My argument is that Pinkvoy's proposition is completely erroneous.

In order to understand what Christians BELIEVED in antiquity and how Jesus was described we MUST at least examine Apologetic sources and the NT and then COMPARE what Christians believed to the Beliefs of the Essenes.

In "Hypothetica" and "On the Comtemplative Life" we have description of the Beliefs and ritual of the Essenes.

See http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/yonge/book34.html

See http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/yonge/book37.html

The Pauline writer is claimed to be a SUPPOSED contemporary of Philo.

We have Pauline letters which state the supposed TEACHINGS of Paul during the TIME OF PHILO.

Now, let us go through LINE by LINE and COMPARE the Beliefs of the Essenes and the Teachings of the supposed Paul.

1. First of all there is NOTHING about any BELIEF of the Essenes in a resurrected character in the writings of Philo in "Hypothetica" or "On the Comtemplative Life".

2. There is NOTHING about Salvation by Sacrifice or the resurrection of a character in the "Hypothetica" or "On the Comteplative Life".

3. There is Nothing about the worship of a resurrected character as the Son of God in "Hypothetica" or "On the Contemplative Life".

4. There is NOTHING about a character who was called the Messiah by the Essenes in "Hypothetica" and "On the Contemplative Life".

But, this is MOST significant.

The Essenes REPUDIATE MARRIAGE

Hypothetica
Quote:
.....they repudiate marriage; and at the same time they practise continence in an eminent degree; for no one of the Essenes ever marries a wife...
Surely based on the supposed Pauline letters Christians were being Married.

1 Corinthians 7:9 KJV
Quote:
But if they cannot contain , let them marry : for it is better to marry than to burn
It is clear that the Essenes were NOT Jesus cult Christians based on the abundance of evidence.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 07-26-2012, 01:17 PM   #22
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
Default

By that type of reasoning the Shakers could not have been any part of the Christian religion.
It presumes all Christian sects must have accepted identical teachings and practices. There is certainly is no evidence that can establish that as being a fact.
And Corinthians was written who knows how long after Christian communities had became established. It was a reactionary document penned -after the fact- in an attempt to control and to standardize the previously varying sectarian 'Christian' beliefs and practices.



.
Sheshbazzar is offline  
Old 07-26-2012, 06:18 PM   #23
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
Default

What are Essenes anyway?? According to Philo the term was a generic description or even a nickname, and the writer under the name of Josephus got all confused in his creative writing class to then describe the "Essenes" as an identifiable sect of Jews, as a MAJOR phenomenon or "Philosophy." How ridiculous.

Almost as ridiculous as the novel called history of Massada, or even as the non-existent sect living and writing in Qumran.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
aa5874: the argument in the OP is that the Essenes were really early Christians, or perhaps that Jesus was tied into the Essenes. If you are not going to post about the Essenes, stop posting in this thread.

We all know that Philo did not mention any Christians by name, and the only mention in Josephus is a likely interpolation.

Going on about differences between later Christian theology and pseudohistory does not show anything about what Christians might have been in the first century, if there were in fact any Christians.
Duvduv is offline  
Old 07-26-2012, 07:02 PM   #24
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv View Post
What are Essenes anyway?? According to Philo the term was a generic description or even a nickname, and the writer under the name of Josephus got all confused in his creative writing class to then describe the "Essenes" as an identifiable sect of Jews, as a MAJOR phenomenon or "Philosophy." How ridiculous.

Almost as ridiculous as the novel called history of Massada, or even as the non-existent sect living and writing in Qumran....
What a load of BS.

Did Pliny the Elder also INVENT the Essenes??

Please, let us do history and forget about Imagination.

Pliny the Elder in Natural History

Quote:
"To the west (of the Dead Sea) the Essenes have put the necessary distance between themselves and the insalubrious shore. They are a people unique of its kind and admirable beyond all others in the whole world; without women and renouncing love entirely, without money and having for company only palm trees....
aa5874 is offline  
Old 07-27-2012, 06:41 AM   #26
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
Default

I think it's hardly necessary to build a sand castle based on a writing ascribed to Pliny the Elder that gets geography wrong. Besides, maybe this author was written LONG after Philo or Josephus anyway.

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv View Post
What are Essenes anyway?? According to Philo the term was a generic description or even a nickname, and the writer under the name of Josephus got all confused in his creative writing class to then describe the "Essenes" as an identifiable sect of Jews, as a MAJOR phenomenon or "Philosophy." How ridiculous.

Almost as ridiculous as the novel called history of Massada, or even as the non-existent sect living and writing in Qumran....
What a load of BS.

Did Pliny the Elder also INVENT the Essenes??

Please, let us do history and forget about Imagination.

Pliny the Elder in Natural History

Quote:
"To the west (of the Dead Sea) the Essenes have put the necessary distance between themselves and the insalubrious shore. They are a people unique of its kind and admirable beyond all others in the whole world; without women and renouncing love entirely, without money and having for company only palm trees....
Duvduv is offline  
Old 07-27-2012, 08:28 AM   #27
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv View Post
I think it's hardly necessary to build a sand castle based on a writing ascribed to Pliny the Elder that gets geography wrong. Besides, maybe this author was written LONG after Philo or Josephus anyway...
All you have is Hot air. You are being consumed by the evidence from antiquity. You are fighting against history with your imagination.

Now, Hippolytus wrote ELEVEN chapters on the Essenes in "Refutation of All Heresies".

http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/050109.htm
aa5874 is offline  
Old 07-27-2012, 08:47 AM   #28
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

I am making COUNTER arguments against Pinkvoy's proposition.

My argument is that the Essenes were NOT part of the Jesus cult of Christians and did NOT worship a character called the LORD Jesus as a God

Paul was supposedly a Contemporary of Philo, Josephus and the Essenes.

In a supposed Pauline letter, Paul claimed Jesus was LORD and that Every person should Bow TO THE NAME of Jesus.

The Essenes did NOT call anyone LORD except God ALONE based on Hippolytus. In effect, Essenes would rather be KILLED than to be a Pauline Christian.

Refutation of All Heresies 9
Quote:
And the adherents of another party call no one Lord except the Deity, even though one should put them to the torture, or even kill them.

Philippians 2
Quote:
10That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow , of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth;11And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 07-27-2012, 10:07 AM   #29
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
Default

He sounds like recycled Josephus or vice versa. He classifies the Essenes as the "third great group" after the Pharisees and Saduccees. And yet there is not a single reference to such a group alongside the Saduccees as heretics/sectarians in any Jewish religious source from antinquity. None. And of course it was said that there were various types of Pharisees as well. So let's not build sand castles from Hippolytus or anyone else.

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv View Post
I think it's hardly necessary to build a sand castle based on a writing ascribed to Pliny the Elder that gets geography wrong. Besides, maybe this author was written LONG after Philo or Josephus anyway...
All you have is Hot air. You are being consumed by the evidence from antiquity. You are fighting against history with your imagination.

Now, Hippolytus wrote ELEVEN chapters on the Essenes in "Refutation of All Heresies".

http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/050109.htm
Duvduv is offline  
Old 07-27-2012, 10:36 AM   #30
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvduv View Post
He sounds like recycled Josephus or vice versa. He classifies the Essenes as the "third great group" after the Pharisees and Saduccees. And yet there is not a single reference to such a group alongside the Saduccees as heretics/sectarians in any Jewish religious source from antinquity. None. And of course it was said that there were various types of Pharisees as well. So let's not build sand castles from Hippolytus or anyone else...
You are FIGHTING history with your Imagination. Hippolytus wrote information about the Essenes that is NOT found in Josephus. You are just blowing Hot AIR and have NOTHING but ad hoc inventions.
aa5874 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:34 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.