FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-06-2007, 04:24 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: usa
Posts: 3,103
Default Ive not read Philo or Josepheus still, Jesus & Paul don't seem very Torah-observant

Ive not read Philo or Josepheus nor Talmud,

I have taken a cursory glance at Rabbinic writings, and I am aware of the centrality of the Torah in Jewish religious and rabbinic life. the Torah is central in the Talmud if wiki is right on this.

I do not know how central the Torah is in Philo and Josepheus writings, but

Jesus & Paul don't seem very Torah-obsessed, in the way that characterizes modern Orthodox Judaism. Jesus and Paul don't seem to spend much time commenting on the Torah. Jesus seemed to prefer to introduce his own parables rather than comment on Torah, and he doesn't seem to connect his own teachings, to Torah. Paul seems to write mostly of Christ's resurrection, rather than Torah interpretation. Is this typical of religious Jews of first century CE?

I aware that there are MJ who say Jesus never existed. Still it strikes me as puzzling that the figure depicted in the Gospels seems to lack much interest in Torah, given it was written by Jews, and Paul, who was a Pharisee, which would become Orthodox Judaism.

I don't want to turn this into a MJ thread, but it does surprise me that the Gospels do not depict a messiah who doesn't make every other verse about the Torah. Other messiahs whose historicity are not questioned, like that Hasidic Jew who in New York, who when I google i get some guy named Schneerson, stressed Torah observance.
gnosis92 is offline  
Old 03-06-2007, 04:28 PM   #2
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

If you find a copy of Hyam Maccoby's The Myth-Maker, Paul and the Invention of Christianity, you will find some discussion of these issues.
Toto is offline  
Old 03-06-2007, 04:35 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,674
Default

Paul said that Jesus made the law obsolete.

There is conflicting information in the Gospels about the law, but the writer of Mark, who of course set the tone for all of them, clearly had no love for the law, and had Jesus say that the laws were not important, just doing good to one another, etc.
Malachi151 is offline  
Old 03-06-2007, 04:57 PM   #4
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Palm Springs, California
Posts: 10,955
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gnosis92 View Post
Ive not read Philo or Josepheus nor Talmud,

I have taken a cursory glance at Rabbinic writings, and I am aware of the centrality of the Torah in Jewish religious and rabbinic life. the Torah is central in the Talmud if wiki is right on this.

I do not know how central the Torah is in Philo and Josepheus writings, but

Jesus & Paul don't seem very Torah-obsessed, in the way that characterizes modern Orthodox Judaism. Jesus and Paul don't seem to spend much time commenting on the Torah. Jesus seemed to prefer to introduce his own parables rather than comment on Torah, and he doesn't seem to connect his own teachings, to Torah. Paul seems to write mostly of Christ's resurrection, rather than Torah interpretation. Is this typical of religious Jews of first century CE?

I aware that there are MJ who say Jesus never existed. Still it strikes me as puzzling that the figure depicted in the Gospels seems to lack much interest in Torah, given it was written by Jews, and Paul, who was a Pharisee, which would become Orthodox Judaism.

I don't want to turn this into a MJ thread, but it does surprise me that the Gospels do not depict a messiah who doesn't make every other verse about the Torah. Other messiahs whose historicity are not questioned, like that Hasidic Jew who in New York, who when I google i get some guy named Schneerson, stressed Torah observance.
I think you're retrojecting. Judaism in the 1st century was in flux and not like the modern Judaism that arose after the destruction of the Temple.

Indeed much of what we know of 1st century Judaism comes from the Christian scriptures, which were apparently written entirely by Jewish authors about Jewish persons about Jewish matters, such as the meaning of the Law.

Finally an argument can be made that Paul, in setting the tone for Christianity, played a large part in the formation of modern Judaism, which after the destruction of the Temple in many ways developed in conflict with Christianity, defining itself in relationship to a majority Christian culture.
Gamera is offline  
Old 03-06-2007, 07:54 PM   #5
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 293
Default

Gnosis,

Flavius Josephus, in Wars tells us about the 3 main sects of Judaism and a summary of their philosophies. Antiquities also has some sections about the 3 sects.(2.2.117 I believe) There is a lot of information in Josephus, especially about the Essenes, but also about the Pharisees and Saduccees as well as the rebel sects, the Zealots and the Sciarii. I have put a section from his Jewish Wars below, but there is much more to be found in Antiquities describing the various Jewish sects and their various approaches to the law.


Gamera ,

Quote:
Indeed much of what we know of 1st century Judaism comes from the Christian scriptures, which were apparently written entirely by Jewish authors about Jewish persons about Jewish matters, such as the meaning of the Law.
I take issue with this and would further say that such info from the Xtian scriptures is incomplete and that they are a biased source about the various sects of Judaism, customs and Torah. Even worse, some aspects they get or make implications that are completely wrong. For example, Jesus is completely out of line driving the "money-changers" out of the temple. That was sanctioned by the law and the temple administration and was necessary for the constant influx of pilgrims to the temple. And technically, how could a [unmarried] prostitute ever commit adultery ?
Using only Xtian scriptures you would know nothing about the Essenes, very little about the Saduccees, and a very skewed view of the Pharisees.

There is considerably more information about the various sects and customs in Josephus. For Torah interpretation the Talmud(s) are far more comprehensive and there you will find stories and many commentaries refering back to and from this period.


Here is the section from The Jewish War, at Book 2, chap 8, starting at paragraph 2. Here Josephus is describing the 3 main sects of Judaism of the first century, the Essenes, Saduccees and Pharisees.

Essenes
Quote:
For there are three philosophical sects among the Jews. The followers of the first of which are the Pharisees; of the second, the Sadducees; and the third sect, which pretends to a severer discipline, are called Essens. These last are Jews by birth, and seem to have a greater affection for one another than the other sects have. These Essens reject pleasures as an evil, but esteem continence, and the conquest over our passions, to be virtue. They neglect wedlock, but choose out other persons children, while they are pliable, and fit for learning, and esteem them to be of their kindred, and form them according to their own manners. They do not absolutely deny the fitness of marriage, and the succession of mankind thereby continued; but they guard against the lascivious behavior of women, and are persuaded that none of them preserve their fidelity to one man.
<snip - he goes on about the essenes>
11. For their doctrine is this: That bodies are corruptible, and that the matter they are made of is not permanent; but that the souls are immortal, and continue for ever; and that they come out of the most subtile air, and are united to their bodies as to prisons, into which they are drawn by a certain natural enticement; but that when they are set free from the bonds of the flesh, they then, as released from a long bondage, rejoice and mount upward. And this is like the opinions of the Greeks, that good souls have their habitations beyond the ocean, in a region that is neither oppressed with storms of rain or snow, or with intense heat, but that this place is such as is refreshed by the gentle breathing of a west wind, that is perpetually blowing from the ocean; while they allot to bad souls a dark and tempestuous den, full of never-ceasing punishments.
<it goes on>

Pharisees

Quote:
the Pharisees are those who are esteemed most skillful in the exact explication of their laws, and introduce the first sect. These ascribe all to fate [or providence], and to God, and yet allow, that to act what is right, or the contrary, is principally in the power of men, although fate does co-operate in every action. They say that all souls are incorruptible, but that the souls of good men only are removed into other bodies, - but that the souls of bad men are subject to eternal punishment.

Sadducees

Quote:
But the Sadducees are those that compose the second order, and take away fate entirely, and suppose that God is not concerned in our doing or not doing what is evil; and they say, that to act what is good, or what is evil, is at men's own choice, and that the one or the other belongs so to every one, that they may act as they please. They also take away the belief of the immortal duration of the soul, and the punishments and rewards in Hades. Moreover, the Pharisees are friendly to one another, and are for the exercise of concord, and regard for the public; but the behavior of the Sadducees one towards another is in some degree wild, and their conversation with those that are of their own party is as barbarous as if they were strangers to them. And this is what I had to say concerning the philosophic sects among the Jews.
Fortuna is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:27 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.