Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
11-25-2008, 11:16 PM | #41 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
Quote:
And the flood story as written conveys no other meaning than the entire world was flooded. Trying to now claim that there is some other meaning to the flood is simply making stuff up. The church writers did not claim the flood was figurative. |
|
11-26-2008, 11:44 AM | #42 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: home
Posts: 3,715
|
Quote:
|
|
11-26-2008, 01:05 PM | #43 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,305
|
Quote:
[3] First of all you must understand this, that scoffers will come in the last days with scoffing, following their own passions [4] and saying, "Where is the promise of his coming? For ever since the fathers fell asleep, all things have continued as they were from the beginning of creation." [5] They deliberately ignore this fact, that by the word of God heavens existed long ago, and an earth formed out of water and by means of water, [6] through which the world that then existed was deluged with water and perished. [7] But by the same word the heavens and earth that now exist have been stored up for fire, being kept until the day of judgment and destruction of ungodly men. [2 Peter 3] |
||
11-26-2008, 02:43 PM | #44 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: home
Posts: 3,715
|
At the time the author of 2 Peter wrote that the story of the flood has been around for a few centuries. The question is what the author and hir audience thought when the story originated (who knows when) and when it was written down in its various editions.
|
11-26-2008, 04:38 PM | #45 | ||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 6,471
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
d |
||||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|