![]()  | 
	
		Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#1 | 
| 
			
			 Regular Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Mar 2005 
				Location: Houston, TX 
				
				
					Posts: 389
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I'm no bibical scholar, so I am looking for somebody who can cite a reference. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	On another site I frequent, the argument was made that the Koran orders its followers to kill infidels, and that the bible does not. This argument was made to support the thesis that it is NOT poverty and desperation driving islamic fundamentalists to kill -- it is their religion, and if they were christians, they wouldn't be doing it. I argued that if the middle east were as wealthy as the west, you wouldn't be seeing terrorism as the problem it is today. Can anybody answer this question for me, with references to relevant portions of holy texts? Thanks!  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#2 | 
| 
			
			 Regular Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: May 2004 
				Location: USA 
				
				
					Posts: 171
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			In the old testament God orders israelites to do extremely violent actions.  However, the message of the new testament is much more pacifistic (Is that a word????  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	  ) i.e. turn the other cheek etc...
		 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#3 | 
| 
			
			 Contributor 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jun 2000 
				Location: Los Angeles area 
				
				
					Posts: 40,549
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Luke 19:27 But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	ETA just a comment on the OP: Christianity was at least as violent as modern Islam is certain phases of its development. But I don't think you can blame this on poverty or scripture. The middle east today is the seat of vast wealth from oil. But what is done with that? The Saudi's have taken their oil money and financed fundamentalist obscurantist madrassas who have promoted one particular reading of Islam.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#4 | 
| 
			
			 Junior Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Apr 2005 
				Location: The united States 
				
				
					Posts: 8
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			No where in the New Testament are Christians ordered to kill.   
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	The whole of the New Testament can be summed up in the phrase "love one another as I have loved you" As far as the argument you are involved in obviously many heinous things have been done by so called Christians through out the ages. But Jesus never killed anyone or whished anyone killed. Mohamed on the other hand did kill and advocated killing under certain circumstances. But that is not to say that there are not good and decent Muslims in the world.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#5 | |
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Nov 2003 
				Location: Eagle River, Alaska 
				
				
					Posts: 7,816
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#6 | 
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Dec 2003 
				Location: Northern California 
				
				
					Posts: 7,558
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Luke 19 is a parable. It's not Jesus ordering his followers around. Yes, the character who says the line in the parable represents God, but it looks more like an end-times metaphor than an order for humans to kill each other.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#7 | ||
| 
			
			 Contributor 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jun 2000 
				Location: Los Angeles area 
				
				
					Posts: 40,549
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I don't see this. Luke 19 contains a parable, told in the 3rd person (he said. . .) Jesus finishes with the parable and reveals the moral, taking the point of the parable and turning it into a universal generalization:  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Quote: 
	
 That's I say unto you. Then Jesus says: Quote: 
	
  | 
||
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#8 | |
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Dec 2003 
				Location: Northern California 
				
				
					Posts: 7,558
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			It was still the nobleman from the parable talking to his servants who said those things. The characters in the parable speak in the first person. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Here's the beginning of the parable: Quote: 
	
  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#9 | 
| 
			
			 Junior Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Apr 2005 
				Location: The united States 
				
				
					Posts: 8
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Jesus was speaking in a parable that has to do with the final judgment of mankind.  You will be happy to know that what the parable means is that those who have knowledge of God and misuse it or waste it on their own selfish wants are going to be judge the harshest in the End. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	The final reference at the end of the parable the part that says “ But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me.�? Means this He was speaking of His place in the final Judgment where he will judge the quick and the dead. This Parable that Jesus spoke about His final Judgement of mankind is not a command for Christians to kill although I am sure that some evil people over the years have interpreted it that way and used it for there own justification.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#10 | 
| 
			
			 Contributor 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jun 2000 
				Location: Los Angeles area 
				
				
					Posts: 40,549
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Sp who says "For I say unto you, That unto every one which hath shall be given; and from him that hath not, even that he hath shall be taken away from him?" That sounds like someone standing outside the parable, who has finished the story and is drawing a lesson. Why would you think that the next sentence steps back inside the parable? 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	And if this is part of the parable, then slaying those who rejected the rule applies both to the Lord and to Jesus. Saying that it will happen in the next world scarcely makes it nicer.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
		
  |