FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-06-2012, 08:45 PM   #21
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diogenes the Cynic View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
So are Roman Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy not Christian?
I'm not sure I understand your question. You said that "the story" (the Gospels) "forced the Roman Empire to adopt it as Gospel truth."

I'm pointing that it was Constantine who forced it on the Roman Empire, not the content of the story.
Actually, it was Theodosius, but Constantine set the process in motion. Ok. Roman Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy are the religions (most of them) that resulted from the imperial edict. So are Roman Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy not Christian?
No and they never were Christian.

Please note that they have the Church Militant as Catholic, the Church Suffering as Purgatorian, and the Church Triumphant as the Saints in Heaven and neither the Church Suffering nor the Church Triumphant are Catholic in practice.
Chili is offline  
Old 01-06-2012, 09:14 PM   #22
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
If Obama said that you are a Christian, would you agree? Presumably not. However, if a soldier came round and put a bayonet to your neck, you might well say that, erm, maybe you were mistaken, after all. But would you think you were a Christian?
Catholicism is a mystery religion much like Judaism and neither are Christian.

Both are cold and not lukewarm but if the mind of Christ means to be Christian you better not be lukewarm like saved-sinners are, and so to be hot means to be saved and not a sinner and for this religion must be left behind . . . and thus all saved-sinner churches are lukewarm oxymorons at best.
Chili is offline  
Old 01-07-2012, 02:45 AM   #23
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Alternatively, they could just 'disappear'. However they were dealt with, the outcome would be 100% conformism.
This 100% conformism was never achieved.
That's quite true. The above is a hypothetical discussion. In practice, the 'catholic' tag was never fully appropriate. The 'church' was never the monolith that many suppose, for a variety of reasons, the chief of them being that the Vatican simply did not have the resources to impose itself far from Rome. History is a partial record, in both senses of the word, and there may have been even more dissent than we know about, and that the Vatican knew about.
sotto voce is offline  
Old 01-07-2012, 04:53 AM   #24
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
History is a partial record, in both senses of the word, and there may have been even more dissent than we know about, and that the Vatican knew about.
Should read:

History is a partial record, in both senses of the word, and there may have been even more dissent than we know about, and more than the Vatican knew about.

Apologies.
sotto voce is offline  
Old 01-07-2012, 08:52 AM   #25
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Alternatively, they could just 'disappear'. However they were dealt with, the outcome would be 100% conformism.
This 100% conformism was never achieved.
That's quite true. The above is a hypothetical discussion. In practice, the 'catholic' tag was never fully appropriate. The 'church' was never the monolith that many suppose, for a variety of reasons, the chief of them being that the Vatican simply did not have the resources to impose itself far from Rome. History is a partial record, in both senses of the word, and there may have been even more dissent than we know about, and that the Vatican knew about.
Catholics have the freedom to believe or not believe and I think they said the Creed in Latin so they would not know what they believed. So how can you be a dissenter if you do not know what you believe? At least I never did, and always thought it is a sinners paradise where freedom reigns and 3 hail Mary's will get you permission to sin some more and 5 might get you a phone number on the way out. Not me, of course, as I was not old enough for that and still remember the priest pounding his fist on the fancy pulpit rail shouting that pennies was not good enough and wanted to see nickles instead. I then also figured our why they had 3 collection rounds and 4 during high Mass so they would get as close to that nickle as they could (and I think my dad figured that they sang 'high masss' so thy could get the fourth round in).

My first attendance was Holy Cummuion mass in grade 2, was it?, and my Catholic school ended in grade 6 and from there we were free to go as we pleased except that mother made us go to church or else we could not go to the bar, etc. and that is just the way it was.

And did I not see a picture once in the Baltimore Cathechism of a stairway to heaven in the back of the church? so that no 'Christian' shall be seen coming through the doors? So then, if they do not know what they believe does it really matter what they believe? and is that maybe done so that 'iconic imprinting' can have the final word?
Chili is offline  
Old 01-08-2012, 08:01 PM   #26
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: The only Carribean port not in the Tropics.
Posts: 359
Default

Chili, I used to be in the Boston Church of Christ, and when they passed the collection plate around everyone would sing "Seek Ye First The Kingdom Of God" (gMatt 6:33) to get everyone else into the mentality of coughing up the dough for the Church and To God Be The Glory!

Of course, the real glory went to the church leaders and eventually the rank-and-file figured them out for the greedy bastards that they were (but that was long after I left).
la70119 is offline  
Old 01-08-2012, 09:46 PM   #27
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by la70119 View Post
Chili, I used to be in the Boston Church of Christ, and when they passed the collection plate around everyone would sing "Seek Ye First The Kingdom Of God" (gMatt 6:33) to get everyone else into the mentality of coughing up the dough for the Church and To God Be The Glory!

Of course, the real glory went to the church leaders and eventually the rank-and-file figured them out for the greedy bastards that they were (but that was long after I left).
It is the snake who taught them to do that, don't you think? and I doubt that they will ever learn to walk upright.
Chili is offline  
Old 01-10-2012, 03:52 AM   #28
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Alternatively, they could just 'disappear'. However they were dealt with, the outcome would be 100% conformism.
This 100% conformism was never achieved.
That's quite true. The above is a hypothetical discussion. In practice, the 'catholic' tag was never fully appropriate. The 'church' was never the monolith that many suppose, for a variety of reasons, the chief of them being that the Vatican simply did not have the resources to impose itself far from Rome. History is a partial record, in both senses of the word, and there may have been even more dissent than we know about, and that the Vatican knew about.
I think the dissent at Nicaea was dealt with by the legions. If they could use the most ancient and highly revered architecture in the empire (the Asclepian temples and libraries and gymnasia) for ballista practice, and publically execute chief pagan priests, those who were not the tall poppies may have thought twice about dissent.

The Vatican certainly knew how to preserve an index of prohibited books from the time of Eusebius and Constantine from the 4th to the 15th century when the "Index Librorum Prohibitorum" was first printed. The problem for the Vatican is that some of these heretical books which were on the index of prohibited books cited by Eusebius in the 4th century are now turning up in manuscript discoveries, and being read by an educated public opinion.

I would like to read Ammianus Marcellinus's obituary to Bullneck, but it seems that this didn't survive the passage of time. The years between 324/325 and the the mid 4th century (where Ammianus starts) are quite "Black Holish". That is there is very little evidence for what happened and what didn't happen. It's almost like this ground has been swept clean of any evidence. What happened in those years is anyone's guess. Charles Freeman's guess is that the Greek intellectual tradition was suppressed under the rules of the Christian emperors.


mountainman is offline  
Old 01-10-2012, 04:14 AM   #29
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Alternatively, they could just 'disappear'. However they were dealt with, the outcome would be 100% conformism.
This 100% conformism was never achieved.
That's quite true. The above is a hypothetical discussion. In practice, the 'catholic' tag was never fully appropriate. The 'church' was never the monolith that many suppose, for a variety of reasons, the chief of them being that the Vatican simply did not have the resources to impose itself far from Rome. History is a partial record, in both senses of the word, and there may have been even more dissent than we know about, and that the Vatican knew about.
Quote:
I think the dissent at Nicaea was dealt with by the legions.
Ultimately, yes. I'm sure that's right. The mere threat of legions was sufficient.

Quote:
If they could use the most ancient and highly revered architecture in the empire (the Asclepian temples and libraries and gymnasia) for ballista practice, and publically execute chief pagan priests, those who were not the tall poppies may have thought twice about dissent.
The message of the new religion, far from being 'Turn the other cheek' was 'Might is right'.

Quote:
The Vatican certainly knew how to preserve an index of prohibited books from the time of Eusebius and Constantine from the 4th to the 15th century when the "Index Librorum Prohibitorum" was first printed. The problem for the Vatican is that some of these heretical books which were on the index of prohibited books cited by Eusebius in the 4th century are now turning up in manuscript discoveries, and being read by an educated public opinion.
Oh dear.

Perhaps a condition of the continuation of Vatican City State could be that it allows free access by historians to its library. That seems reasonable enough.

Quote:
I would like to read Ammianus Marcellinus's obituary to Bullneck, but it seems that this didn't survive the passage of time. The years between 324/325 and the the mid 4th century (where Ammianus starts) are quite "Black Holish". That is there is very little evidence for what happened and what didn't happen. It's almost like this ground has been swept clean of any evidence. What happened in those years is anyone's guess. Charles Freeman's guess is that the Greek intellectual tradition was suppressed under the rules of the Christian emperors.
The most significant fact about history is that, when it most matters, there isn't any.




Theodosius' bottom line.

Thank you, mountainman, that is informative.
sotto voce is offline  
Old 01-12-2012, 02:48 PM   #30
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
The most significant fact about history is that, when it most matters, there isn't any.
Hey Sotto Voce,

You may be interested to know that your nom de plume is mentioned in the Syriac "Acts of Philip". Here is the context:

Quote:

Phillip: Let us pray for a fair wind.

Turning to the west
he commanded the angel of peace
who has charm of fair winds
to send a wind to take him
to Carthage in a single day

On board was a Jew, Ananias,
who blasphemed (sotto voice, it seems)
and said:
May Adonai
recompense thee,
and the Christ
on whom thou callest,
who is become dust
and lies in Jerusalem,
while thou livest and leadest
ignorant men astray
by his name.
A wind came and filled the sail.


The Jew rose to help
to hoist the sail,
and an angel bound him
by the great toes
and hung him head down
on the top of the sail.

The ship flew onward
and the Jew cried out.

Philip said:

You shall not come down
till you confess
.

Quite an amusing account of Phillip the Apostle. I happen to think this is just clear example of another satire, but for some reason very few people agree, because it is not customary to entertain the possibility that the "Christian Story" could have been satirized and/or parodied in the 4th century .... Sometimes the most significant fact about history is that, when it most matters, it is not at first openly recognized ....
mountainman is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:28 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.