FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-08-2007, 05:28 PM   #1
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,918
Default Clouseau's anti-Catholic rant split from Pontifex Maximus

Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
Can we have a brief discussion on the dialogue of these
early proto-christians with respect to this prexistent
framework of religious toleration?
Late pseudo-Christians, rather, who imported existing Roman ideas into their caricature of Christianity. So instead of using private houses, elaborate temples- 'churches'- were built. Instead of a democratic ekklesia, a hierarchy of priests was devised. Instead of informal 'love-feasts', formal, elaborate sacrificial rituals were performed. Instead of a temporary historic virgin, a perpetual, eternal one was devised and adulated. Instead of just one God, several were worshipped.

So today we have an inheritance of a Trinity that no-one understands or can understand; a cult of Mary that boggles the minds of Westerners; a Mass with transubstantiation that even priests do not believe in; a hierarchy that is incapable of maintaining the moral standards it sets for the common folk; vast cathedrals built at equally vast expense, the expense of the common folk, now mostly useful as tourist attractions.

And a strange little man in Italy, living on stolen property, who still calls himself by the name that Julius Caesar, killer of many thousands, called himself.
Clouseau is offline  
Old 07-08-2007, 05:55 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the dark places of the world
Posts: 8,093
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouseau View Post
Late pseudo-Christians, rather, blah blah
Yawn.

Do you ever plan to support your claim that Islam is just oriental Christianity, Clouseau?
Sauron is offline  
Old 07-09-2007, 03:30 AM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Pua, in northern Thailand
Posts: 2,823
Default

Hey, a Clouseau post I actually agree with!
Joan of Bark is offline  
Old 07-09-2007, 05:44 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,088
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouseau View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
Can we have a brief discussion on the dialogue of these
early proto-christians with respect to this prexistent
framework of religious toleration?
Late pseudo-Christians, rather, who imported existing Roman ideas into their caricature of Christianity. So instead of using private houses, elaborate temples- 'churches'- were built. Instead of a democratic ekklesia, a hierarchy of priests was devised. Instead of informal 'love-feasts', formal, elaborate sacrificial rituals were performed. Instead of a temporary historic virgin, a perpetual, eternal one was devised and adulated. Instead of just one God, several were worshipped.

So today we have an inheritance of a Trinity that no-one understands or can understand; a cult of Mary that boggles the minds of Westerners; a Mass with transubstantiation that even priests do not believe in; a hierarchy that is incapable of maintaining the moral standards it sets for the common folk; vast cathedrals built at equally vast expense, the expense of the common folk, now mostly useful as tourist attractions.
Some people have beliefs that are different from others. I'm shocked AND amazed!

Quote:
And a strange little man in Italy, living on stolen property, who still calls himself by the name that Julius Caesar, killer of many thousands, called himself.
??
Paul2 is offline  
Old 07-10-2007, 02:57 PM   #5
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,918
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul2 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouseau View Post
Late pseudo-Christians, rather, who imported existing Roman ideas into their caricature of Christianity. So instead of using private houses, elaborate temples- 'churches'- were built. Instead of a democratic ekklesia, a hierarchy of priests was devised. Instead of informal 'love-feasts', formal, elaborate sacrificial rituals were performed. Instead of a temporary historic virgin, a perpetual, eternal one was devised and adulated. Instead of just one God, several were worshipped.

So today we have an inheritance of a Trinity that no-one understands or can understand; a cult of Mary that boggles the minds of Westerners; a Mass with transubstantiation that even priests do not believe in; a hierarchy that is incapable of maintaining the moral standards it sets for the common folk; vast cathedrals built at equally vast expense, the expense of the common folk, now mostly useful as tourist attractions.
Quote:
Some people have beliefs that are different from others.
I have not begun to deal with the long history of threat and compulsion that established this astonishing gobbledegook and inanity, a remarkable 'tribute' to the capacity of human beings to agree to 'believe' and act as if insane.
Clouseau is offline  
Old 07-10-2007, 03:01 PM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the dark places of the world
Posts: 8,093
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouseau View Post
I have not begun to deal with
Yes, that's the point.

Lots of claims. No posts with supporting documentation, however.
Sauron is offline  
Old 07-13-2007, 04:58 AM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,088
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouseau View Post
I have not begun to deal with the long history of threat and compulsion that established this astonishing gobbledegook and inanity, a remarkable 'tribute' to the capacity of human beings to agree to 'believe' and act as if insane.
What about the long history of feeding the poor, helping the sick, and getting people into heaven?

But seriously though, you will find corruption and abuse of power in any organization, not just the catholic church.
Paul2 is offline  
Old 07-13-2007, 05:36 AM   #8
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,918
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul2 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouseau View Post
I have not begun to deal with the long history of threat and compulsion that established this astonishing gobbledegook and inanity, a remarkable 'tribute' to the capacity of human beings to agree to 'believe' and act as if insane.
Quote:
What about the long history of feeding the poor, helping the sick,
Yeah, I know. The typical medieval city was a huddle of hovels, along with a colossal cathedral, built at colossal expense, the expense of the inmates of the hovels. The poor were fed on pure aesthetic values, spiritual bread only.

Quote:
But seriously though, you will find corruption and abuse of power in any organization, not just the catholic church.
Read Paul's instructions for appointing bishops (elders).
Clouseau is offline  
Old 07-13-2007, 08:01 AM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,088
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouseau View Post
Yeah, I know. The typical medieval city was a huddle of hovels, along with a colossal cathedral, built at colossal expense, the expense of the inmates of the hovels. The poor were fed on pure aesthetic values, spiritual bread only.
Yes, and no one else is guilty of that? My point is you've obviously got a chip on your shoulder against the catholic church and you seem to be ignoring the others guilty of the same deeds.

Quote:
Quote:
But seriously though, you will find corruption and abuse of power in any organization, not just the catholic church.
Read Paul's instructions for appointing bishops (elders).
I read a brief bit in Titus, and I don't see what you're getting at.
Paul2 is offline  
Old 07-13-2007, 08:37 AM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,719
Default

As Joan said, a Clouseau post with which I agree, maybe I should buy a pair of skates.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul2 View Post
Yes, and no one else is guilty of that? My point is you've obviously got a chip on your shoulder against the catholic church and you seem to be ignoring the others guilty of the same deeds.
But are they? In spirit, certainly, as Protestants are also well known for damning people to hell. The big difference, though, is in the level of organization. Catholicism is a centrally organized monolith, and hence massively dangerous. Protestantism did away with the hierarchy and conveniently split apart into many factions. This "divide yourself and you can't conquer" strategy has been beneficial for the world in general. There are no doubt as many Protestants who would torture someone for the good of their soul as there are Catholics who would do that. The Protestants just don't have the organization to make it work.

Gerard Stafleu
gstafleu is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:55 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.