Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
07-08-2007, 02:55 PM | #1 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
|
Pontifex Maximus and the Apostic Succession
From WIKI: Pontifex Maximus
Quote:
Notably, Constantine was one of the last of the long line of Pontifex Maximi, and that Damasus was the first bishop to occupy the position. As far as I am aware, the prenicene christian dialogue avoids mention of this dominating cultural and indigenous high ranking role in the Roman empire, with few exceptions. Can we have a brief discussion on the dialogue of these early proto-christians with respect to this prexistent framework of religious toleration? Was it Tertullian? Best wishes, Pete |
|
07-08-2007, 03:51 PM | #2 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
The role of Pontifex Maximus combined political and religious authority. For the period in question, the head of the Roman Empire was also the head of the Roman religion, sort of like the King or Queen of England is the head of the Anglican Church. I'm not sure what you think there is to discuss about this.
|
07-08-2007, 05:44 PM | #3 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: England
Posts: 2,561
|
Is there any office currently occupied by anyone in the world which has been continuously occupied as long as the office of Pontifex Maximus?
I mean, when the office of the head of a religion is eight hundred years older than the religion itself, that's what you call tradition. |
07-09-2007, 07:34 AM | #4 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,918
|
Quote:
|
|
07-10-2007, 09:29 PM | #5 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
|
Which non pagan prenicene author makes
reference to "Pontifex Maximus", and what did the text say? Why do you think there are no extant epistles to the "Pontifex Maximus", the long-standing state-level coordinator of empire wide and beyond religious practices? |
07-11-2007, 01:04 AM | #6 | ||||
Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,918
|
Quote:
www.iidb.org/vbb/showthread.php?p=4599119#post4599119 |
||||
07-11-2007, 04:38 PM | #7 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
|
WIKI
Quote:
Tertullian is just a Eusebian stooge getting some mileage up in the prenice pseudo-historical pageantry the planet has swallowed since it was force-fed to the attendees summoned by Constantine to Nicaea. |
|
07-12-2007, 12:57 AM | #8 | ||
Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,918
|
Quote:
|
||
07-13-2007, 07:01 AM | #9 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
|
There is also another article which claims
there are "numerous mentions" by the prenicene "christian fathers" to the title "Pontifex Maximus" : One of the most amazing aspects about the ascendancy of the papacy is that the church of Rome promotes the pope as the "Pontifex Maximus" or, Supreme Pontiff. The title Pontifex Maximus is mentioned numerous times by the early church fathers (particularly by Tertullian), but it was not applied to a Christian bishop. The early church fathers say that the Pontifex Maximus was the "King of Heathendom", the evil high priest of the pagan mystery religion of Rome. It is certainly not likely that Christ appointed Peter "Pontifex Maximus" of Rome.Who were these others apart from Tertullian? Does anyone know? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|