Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
04-16-2008, 07:37 AM | #811 | |||
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,787
|
Emphasis added for the confused.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
04-16-2008, 08:06 AM | #812 | |||
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
[QUOTE=Ben C Smith;5276909]Emphasis added for the confused.
Quote:
Quote:
And again, Gamera never mentioned the source for his information about "the house churches of Paul that were roughly at Philo's time". |
|||
04-16-2008, 09:36 AM | #813 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
|
The source is explicitly given as "by Paul" which, of course, means the letters attributed to Paul. If you meant to ask which letters and how the dating was established, you did a poor job of it because your actual (repeated) request makes it seem as though you either did not read or did not understand the post.
|
04-16-2008, 09:47 AM | #814 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
Quote:
What source explicitly makes a reference to churches by Paul and Christian Churches in Philo's time? And please note that Philo never mentioned any Christian churches during his own time in all his extant writings. |
|
04-16-2008, 09:57 AM | #815 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
04-16-2008, 10:42 AM | #816 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,058
|
Quote:
So on your own grounds for determining whether something mentioned in other sources existed -- namely, that Philo has to have mentioned it -- these things didn't exist either. Jeffrey |
||
04-16-2008, 11:00 AM | #817 | |||||
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Eusebius in Church History 2.16 Quote:
|
|||||
04-16-2008, 11:41 AM | #818 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,787
|
Quote:
What Eusebius does is to call Philo a man very much celebrated by many of our own, that is, Christians. Note that our own pronoun, whose scope has to include Eusebius himself, by definition, since it is a first person pronoun. Lurkers can read for themselves how many records remain from early Christians up to the time of Eusebius who refer to Philo. Keep in mind that these references are only those that remain out of all the Christian literature written during those first three centuries: Clement of Alexandria, about 5 mentions of Philo.There are many, many more mentions of Philo from century IV, and Eusebius undoubtedly had his finger on the pulse of the eastern church, at least, so far as the popularity of Philo was concerned in his own day. Eusebius was right; Philo was famous among many early Christians. Ben. |
|
04-16-2008, 01:23 PM | #819 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
04-17-2008, 08:30 AM | #820 |
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
The reason I call Eusebius a blatant liar is because I have isolated several cases of mis-leading and false information provided by Eusebius with respect to Philo and Josephus. Some of these cases I have already posted.
For example, Eusebius gave false and mis-leading information about the following:
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|